rs370173269
Variant summary
Our verdict is Uncertain significance. Variant got 2 ACMG points: 3P and 1B. PM2PP2BP4
The NM_000081.4(LYST):c.11354G>A(p.Arg3785His) variant causes a missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000341 in 1,613,642 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★★). Synonymous variant affecting the same amino acid position (i.e. R3785R) has been classified as Likely benign.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_000081.4 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Uncertain_significance. Variant got 2 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LYST | NM_000081.4 | c.11354G>A | p.Arg3785His | missense_variant | 53/53 | ENST00000389793.7 | NP_000072.2 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LYST | ENST00000389793.7 | c.11354G>A | p.Arg3785His | missense_variant | 53/53 | 5 | NM_000081.4 | ENSP00000374443 | P1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0000329 AC: 5AN: 152136Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.0000517 AC: 13AN: 251446Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.0000515 AC XY: 7AN XY: 135892
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0000342 AC: 50AN: 1461506Hom.: 0 Cov.: 30 AF XY: 0.0000316 AC XY: 23AN XY: 727100
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0000329 AC: 5AN: 152136Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0000269 AC XY: 2AN XY: 74308
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Chédiak-Higashi syndrome Uncertain:2
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Apr 28, 2017 | This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases did not allow this variant to be ruled in or out of causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as a variant of unknown significance. - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Aug 30, 2021 | This sequence change replaces arginine with histidine at codon 3785 of the LYST protein (p.Arg3785His). The arginine residue is moderately conserved and there is a small physicochemical difference between arginine and histidine. This variant is present in population databases (rs370173269, ExAC 0.01%). This variant has not been reported in the literature in individuals affected with LYST-related conditions. ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 451194). Algorithms developed to predict the effect of missense changes on protein structure and function are either unavailable or do not agree on the potential impact of this missense change (SIFT: "Tolerated"; PolyPhen-2: "Probably Damaging"; Align-GVGD: "Class C0"). In summary, the available evidence is currently insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease. Therefore, it has been classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. - |
not provided Uncertain:2
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Mayo Clinic Laboratories, Mayo Clinic | Apr 13, 2022 | - - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Dec 18, 2019 | Not observed at a significant frequency in large population cohorts (Lek et al., 2016); In silico analysis, which includes protein predictors and evolutionary conservation, supports that this variant does not alter protein structure/function - |
Autoinflammatory syndrome Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, The Hospital for Sick Children | Aug 01, 2018 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at