Menu
GeneBe

rs370345996

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -8 ACMG points: 0P and 8B. BP6_Very_Strong

The NM_004360.5(CDH1):c.2399G>A(p.Arg800His) variant causes a missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000143 in 1,613,610 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. R800C) has been classified as Uncertain significance.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.000020 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.000014 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

CDH1
NM_004360.5 missense

Scores

8
10
1

Clinical Significance

Benign reviewed by expert panel U:4B:5

Conservation

PhyloP100: 6.65
Variant links:
Genes affected
CDH1 (HGNC:1748): (cadherin 1) This gene encodes a classical cadherin of the cadherin superfamily. Alternative splicing results in multiple transcript variants, at least one of which encodes a preproprotein that is proteolytically processed to generate the mature glycoprotein. This calcium-dependent cell-cell adhesion protein is comprised of five extracellular cadherin repeats, a transmembrane region and a highly conserved cytoplasmic tail. Mutations in this gene are correlated with gastric, breast, colorectal, thyroid and ovarian cancer. Loss of function of this gene is thought to contribute to cancer progression by increasing proliferation, invasion, and/or metastasis. The ectodomain of this protein mediates bacterial adhesion to mammalian cells and the cytoplasmic domain is required for internalization. This gene is present in a gene cluster with other members of the cadherin family on chromosome 16. [provided by RefSeq, Nov 2015]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -8 ACMG points.

BP6
Variant 16-68829757-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr16-68829757-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 142363.Status of the report is reviewed_by_expert_panel, 3 stars.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE UniProt
CDH1NM_004360.5 linkuse as main transcriptc.2399G>A p.Arg800His missense_variant 15/16 ENST00000261769.10
CDH1NM_001317184.2 linkuse as main transcriptc.2216G>A p.Arg739His missense_variant 14/15
CDH1NM_001317185.2 linkuse as main transcriptc.851G>A p.Arg284His missense_variant 15/16
CDH1NM_001317186.2 linkuse as main transcriptc.434G>A p.Arg145His missense_variant 14/15

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Appris UniProt
CDH1ENST00000261769.10 linkuse as main transcriptc.2399G>A p.Arg800His missense_variant 15/161 NM_004360.5 P1P12830-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.0000198
AC:
3
AN:
151740
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.000131
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.0000147
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.0000159
AC:
4
AN:
251258
Hom.:
0
AF XY:
0.00000736
AC XY:
1
AN XY:
135830
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.0000289
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.0000327
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.0000176
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.0000137
AC:
20
AN:
1461870
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.0000138
AC XY:
10
AN XY:
727240
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.0000224
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.0000116
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.0000144
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.0000331
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.0000198
AC:
3
AN:
151740
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.0000270
AC XY:
2
AN XY:
74036
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.000131
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.0000147
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00
Alfa
AF:
0.0000843
Hom.:
0
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.000116
AC:
1
ExAC
AF:
0.0000165
AC:
2
EpiCase
AF:
0.0000545
EpiControl
AF:
0.00

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Uncertain:4Benign:5
Revision: reviewed by expert panel
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Hereditary diffuse gastric adenocarcinoma Uncertain:2Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingEuropean Reference Network on Genetic Tumour Risk Syndromes (ERN-GENTURIS), i3s - Instituto de Investigação e Inovação em Saúde, University of PortoAug 01, 2022BS2; BP2_Strong (PMID: 30311375) -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingInvitaeDec 25, 2023- -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingMyriad Genetics, Inc.Mar 06, 2023This variant is classified as a variant of uncertain significance as there is insufficient evidence to determine its impact on protein function and/or cancer risk. -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCounsylJan 04, 2018- -
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Uncertain:1Benign:2
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingColor Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color HealthFeb 17, 2023This missense variant replaces arginine with histidine at codon 800 of the CDH1 protein. To our knowledge, functional studies have not been reported for this variant. This variant has been reported in an individual affected with intestinal-type gastric cancer (PMID: 26072394). This variant has been identified in 4/251258 chromosomes in the general population by the Genome Aggregation Database (gnomAD). The available evidence is insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease conclusively. Therefore, this variant is classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submittercurationSema4, Sema4Apr 15, 2021- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAmbry GeneticsFeb 02, 2021This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -
not provided Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxFeb 23, 2017This variant is denoted CDH1 c.2399G>A at the cDNA level, p.Arg800His (R800H) at the protein level, and results in the change of an Arginine to a Histidine (CGC>CAC). This variant has been observed in at least one individual with gastric cancer (van der Post 2015). CDH1 Arg800His was not observed at a significant allele frequency in the NHLBI Exome Sequencing Project. Since Arginine and Histidine share similar properties, this is considered a conservative amino acid substitution. CDH1 Arg800His occurs at a position that is conserved across species and is located in the cytoplasmic domain (Brooks-Wilson 2004, Figueiredo 2013). In silico analyses predict that this variant is probably damaging to protein structure and function. Based on currently available information, it is unclear whether CDH1 Arg800His is pathogenic or benign. We consider it to be a variant of uncertain significance. -
CDH1-related diffuse gastric and lobular breast cancer syndrome Benign:1
Benign, reviewed by expert panelcurationClinGen CDH1 Variant Curation Expert PanelAug 10, 2023The c.2399G>A (p.Arg800His) variant has an allele frequency of 0.00003 (0.003%, 1/30,614 alleles) in the South Asian gnomAD subpopulation (http://gnomad.broadinstitute.org). The variant has been seen in >10 individuals without DCG, SRC tumors, or LBC and whose families do not suggest HDGC (BS2; PMID: 26072394, SCV000186429.5, SCV000210876.13, SCV000254822.4). The variant has been identified in the homozygous state in an individual without personal and family history of DGC, LBC, or SRC tumors (BP2_Strong; SCV000186429.5). In summary, this variant meets criteria to be classified as benign based on the ACMG/AMP criteria applied as specified by the CDH1 Variant Curation Expert Panel (Variant Interpretation Guidelines Version 3.1): BS2, BP2_Strong. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Pathogenic
0.83
BayesDel_addAF
Pathogenic
0.21
D
BayesDel_noAF
Uncertain
0.070
Cadd
Pathogenic
32
Dann
Pathogenic
1.0
DEOGEN2
Uncertain
0.47
T;T;.
Eigen
Pathogenic
0.90
Eigen_PC
Pathogenic
0.89
FATHMM_MKL
Pathogenic
0.99
D
LIST_S2
Pathogenic
0.98
D;D;D
M_CAP
Uncertain
0.12
D
MetaRNN
Uncertain
0.57
D;D;D
MetaSVM
Uncertain
0.38
D
MutationAssessor
Uncertain
2.9
M;.;.
MutationTaster
Benign
1.0
D;D
PrimateAI
Uncertain
0.62
T
PROVEAN
Uncertain
-4.2
D;.;D
REVEL
Uncertain
0.57
Sift
Pathogenic
0.0
D;.;D
Sift4G
Uncertain
0.0060
D;D;D
Polyphen
1.0
D;.;.
Vest4
0.70
MVP
0.96
MPC
1.0
ClinPred
0.98
D
GERP RS
6.0
Varity_R
0.57
gMVP
0.67

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs370345996; hg19: chr16-68863660; API