rs370608239

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -14 ACMG points: 0P and 14B. BP4_StrongBP6BP7BS1BS2

The NM_002047.4(GARS1):​c.1716G>A​(p.Pro572Pro) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000211 in 1,610,862 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 2 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00011 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00022 ( 2 hom. )

Consequence

GARS1
NM_002047.4 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:1B:8

Conservation

PhyloP100: -0.514
Variant links:
Genes affected
GARS1 (HGNC:4162): (glycyl-tRNA synthetase 1) This gene encodes glycyl-tRNA synthetase, one of the aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases that charge tRNAs with their cognate amino acids. The encoded enzyme is an (alpha)2 dimer which belongs to the class II family of tRNA synthetases. It has been shown to be a target of autoantibodies in the human autoimmune diseases, polymyositis or dermatomyositis. Two transcript variants encoding different isoforms have been found for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Oct 2015]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -14 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.55).
BP6
Variant 7-30628576-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr7-30628576-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 194367.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Uncertain_significance=1, Likely_benign=6, Benign=2}. Variant chr7-30628576-G-A is described in Lovd as [Benign].
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-0.514 with no splicing effect.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population eas. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.000112 (17/152194) while in subpopulation EAS AF= 0.000961 (5/5202). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.000379. There are 0 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 13 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High AC in GnomAd4 at 17 AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE Protein UniProt
GARS1NM_002047.4 linkc.1716G>A p.Pro572Pro synonymous_variant 14/17 ENST00000389266.8 NP_002038.2 P41250-1
GARS1NM_001316772.1 linkc.1554G>A p.Pro518Pro synonymous_variant 14/17 NP_001303701.1 P41250-2

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
GARS1ENST00000389266.8 linkc.1716G>A p.Pro572Pro synonymous_variant 14/171 NM_002047.4 ENSP00000373918.3 P41250-1
GARS1ENST00000675651.1 linkc.1716G>A p.Pro572Pro synonymous_variant 14/17 ENSP00000502513.1 A0A6Q8PGZ8
GARS1ENST00000675810.1 linkc.1614G>A p.Pro538Pro synonymous_variant 13/16 ENSP00000502743.1 A0A6Q8PHH9
GARS1ENST00000675693.1 linkc.1548G>A p.Pro516Pro synonymous_variant 15/18 ENSP00000502174.1 A0A6Q8PGA8
GARS1ENST00000675051.1 linkc.1515G>A p.Pro505Pro synonymous_variant 14/17 ENSP00000502296.1 A0A6Q8PGI6
GARS1ENST00000674815.1 linkc.1347G>A p.Pro449Pro synonymous_variant 14/17 ENSP00000502799.1 A0A6Q8PGW4
GARS1ENST00000674851.1 linkc.1347G>A p.Pro449Pro synonymous_variant 15/18 ENSP00000502451.1 A0A6Q8PGW4
GARS1ENST00000444666.6 linkn.*137G>A non_coding_transcript_exon_variant 15/183 ENSP00000415447.2 H7C443
GARS1ENST00000674616.1 linkn.*1430G>A non_coding_transcript_exon_variant 15/18 ENSP00000502408.1 A0A6Q8PGT3
GARS1ENST00000674643.1 linkn.*816G>A non_coding_transcript_exon_variant 15/17 ENSP00000501636.1 A0A6Q8PF45
GARS1ENST00000674737.1 linkn.*1054G>A non_coding_transcript_exon_variant 15/18 ENSP00000502464.1 A0A6Q8PGZ9
GARS1ENST00000674807.1 linkn.1630G>A non_coding_transcript_exon_variant 13/16 ENSP00000502814.1 A0A6Q8PFZ6
GARS1ENST00000675529.1 linkn.*1586G>A non_coding_transcript_exon_variant 15/18 ENSP00000501655.1 A0A6Q8PFN0
GARS1ENST00000675859.1 linkn.1630G>A non_coding_transcript_exon_variant 13/15 ENSP00000502033.1 A0A6Q8PFZ6
GARS1ENST00000676088.1 linkn.*1658G>A non_coding_transcript_exon_variant 16/19 ENSP00000501884.1 A0A6Q8PFN0
GARS1ENST00000676140.1 linkn.*661G>A non_coding_transcript_exon_variant 14/17 ENSP00000502571.1 A0A6Q8PH49
GARS1ENST00000676164.1 linkn.*1167G>A non_coding_transcript_exon_variant 14/17 ENSP00000501986.1 A0A6Q8PFV5
GARS1ENST00000676210.1 linkn.*1005G>A non_coding_transcript_exon_variant 15/18 ENSP00000502373.1 A0A6Q8PGN7
GARS1ENST00000676259.1 linkn.*1148G>A non_coding_transcript_exon_variant 14/17 ENSP00000501980.1 A0A6Q8PFU7
GARS1ENST00000676403.1 linkn.1716G>A non_coding_transcript_exon_variant 14/16 ENSP00000502681.1 A0A6Q8PHI7
GARS1ENST00000444666.6 linkn.*137G>A 3_prime_UTR_variant 15/183 ENSP00000415447.2 H7C443
GARS1ENST00000674616.1 linkn.*1430G>A 3_prime_UTR_variant 15/18 ENSP00000502408.1 A0A6Q8PGT3
GARS1ENST00000674643.1 linkn.*816G>A 3_prime_UTR_variant 15/17 ENSP00000501636.1 A0A6Q8PF45
GARS1ENST00000674737.1 linkn.*1054G>A 3_prime_UTR_variant 15/18 ENSP00000502464.1 A0A6Q8PGZ9
GARS1ENST00000675529.1 linkn.*1586G>A 3_prime_UTR_variant 15/18 ENSP00000501655.1 A0A6Q8PFN0
GARS1ENST00000676088.1 linkn.*1658G>A 3_prime_UTR_variant 16/19 ENSP00000501884.1 A0A6Q8PFN0
GARS1ENST00000676140.1 linkn.*661G>A 3_prime_UTR_variant 14/17 ENSP00000502571.1 A0A6Q8PH49
GARS1ENST00000676164.1 linkn.*1167G>A 3_prime_UTR_variant 14/17 ENSP00000501986.1 A0A6Q8PFV5
GARS1ENST00000676210.1 linkn.*1005G>A 3_prime_UTR_variant 15/18 ENSP00000502373.1 A0A6Q8PGN7
GARS1ENST00000676259.1 linkn.*1148G>A 3_prime_UTR_variant 14/17 ENSP00000501980.1 A0A6Q8PFU7

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.000112
AC:
17
AN:
152194
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.0000241
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.0000655
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.000961
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.000207
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.000132
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.000216
AC:
54
AN:
249584
Hom.:
0
AF XY:
0.000207
AC XY:
28
AN XY:
135410
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.000129
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00222
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.0000654
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.0000794
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.000165
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.000221
AC:
323
AN:
1458668
Hom.:
2
Cov.:
29
AF XY:
0.000233
AC XY:
169
AN XY:
725802
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.0000898
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00452
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.0000812
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.000111
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.0000498
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.000112
AC:
17
AN:
152194
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.000175
AC XY:
13
AN XY:
74350
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.0000241
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.0000655
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.000961
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.000207
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.000132
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00
Alfa
AF:
0.0000564
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.0000680
Asia WGS
AF:
0.00144
AC:
5
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.0000545
EpiControl
AF:
0.0000593

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:8
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:3
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAthena DiagnosticsDec 06, 2024- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAmbry GeneticsJul 11, 2019This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxOct 06, 2017This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -
not provided Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingEurofins Ntd Llc (ga)Dec 02, 2014- -
Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingMolecular Genetics Laboratory, London Health Sciences Centre-- -
Distal spinal muscular atrophy Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaApr 27, 2017This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases allowed determination this variant is unlikely to cause disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as likely benign. -
Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease type 2 Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLabcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), LabcorpNov 01, 2022- -
Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease type 2D Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaApr 27, 2017This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases allowed determination this variant is unlikely to cause disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as likely benign. -
Neuronopathy, distal hereditary motor, type 5A Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaApr 27, 2017This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases allowed determination this variant is unlikely to cause disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as likely benign. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.55
CADD
Benign
4.7
DANN
Benign
0.71

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs370608239; hg19: chr7-30668192; API