rs370962887

Variant names:

Your query was ambiguous. Multiple possible variants found:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BS1BS2

The NM_000256.3(MYBPC3):c.558G>T(p.Pro186Pro) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000339 in 1,612,292 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 5 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00014 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.00036 ( 5 hom. )

Consequence

MYBPC3
NM_000256.3 synonymous

Scores

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:13

Conservation

PhyloP100: -4.82

Variant links:

Genes affected

MYBPC3 (HGNC:7551): (myosin binding protein C3) MYBPC3 encodes the cardiac isoform of myosin-binding protein C. Myosin-binding protein C is a myosin-associated protein found in the cross-bridge-bearing zone (C region) of A bands in striated muscle. MYBPC3 is expressed exclusively in heart muscle and is a key regulator of cardiac contraction. Mutations in this gene are a frequent cause of familial hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. [provided by RefSeq, May 2022]

MYBPC3 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.54).

BP6

Variant 11-47349870-C-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr11-47349870-C-A is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 42772.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr11-47349870-C-A is described in Lovd as [Benign]. Variant chr11-47349870-C-A is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].

BP7

Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-4.82 with no splicing effect.

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population sas. gnomad4_exome allele frequency = 0.00036 (526/1459932) while in subpopulation SAS AF= 0.00587 (504/85906). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00544. There are 5 homozygotes in gnomad4_exome. There are 374 alleles in male gnomad4_exome subpopulation. Median coverage is 31. This position pass quality control queck.

BS2

High Homozygotes in GnomAdExome4 at 5 AD,AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
MYBPC3	NM_000256.3 link	c.558G>T	p.Pro186Pro	synonymous_variant	Exon 5 of 35	ENST00000545968.6	NP_000247.2	Q14896-1A5YM48

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	UniProt
MYBPC3	ENST00000545968.6 link	c.558G>T	p.Pro186Pro	synonymous_variant	Exon 5 of 35	5	NM_000256.3	ENSP00000442795.1	Q14896-1
MYBPC3	ENST00000399249.6 link	c.558G>T	p.Pro186Pro	synonymous_variant	Exon 5 of 34	5		ENSP00000382193.2	A8MXZ9
MYBPC3	ENST00000544791.1 link	n.558G>T		non_coding_transcript_exon_variant	Exon 5 of 27	5		ENSP00000444259.1	F5GZR4

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.000131

AC:

AN:

152242

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00414

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.00

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00

GnomAD3 exomes

AF:

0.000782

AC:

191

AN:

244326

Hom.:

AF XY:

0.000985

AC XY:

131

AN XY:

133044

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS exome

AF:

0.00631

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.000168

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.000360

AC:

526

AN:

1459932

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000515

AC XY:

374

AN XY:

726150

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 AMR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS exome

AF:

0.00587

Gnomad4 FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE exome

AF:

9.00e-7

Gnomad4 OTH exome

AF:

0.000315

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.000138

AC:

AN:

152360

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000242

AC XY:

AN XY:

74502

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 AMR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS

AF:

0.00435

Gnomad4 FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 OTH

AF:

0.00

Alfa

AF:

0.0000434

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.0000264

Asia WGS

AF:

0.00115

AC:

AN:

3478

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign

Submissions summary: Benign:13

Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified

Benign:3

Jun 19, 2015

Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

p.Pro186Pro in exon 5 of MYBPC3: This variant is not expected to have clinical s ignificance because it does not alter an amino acid residue, is not located with in the splice consensus sequence, and has been identified in 0.7% (100/14728) of South Asian chromosomes by the Exome Aggregation Consortium (ExAC, http://exac. broadinstitute.org; dbSNP rs370962887). -

Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center

Significance: Benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Dec 06, 2024

Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy 4

Benign:3

Jun 28, 2017

Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Jan 13, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. -

Apr 25, 2017

Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy

Benign:2

Jan 26, 2025

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Jan 11, 2024

All of Us Research Program, National Institutes of Health

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Left ventricular noncompaction 10

Benign:1

Jan 13, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Cardiomyopathy

Benign:1

Apr 07, 2018

Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

not provided

Benign:1

Mar 03, 2015

GeneDx

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Cardiovascular phenotype

Benign:1

Jun 06, 2019

Ambry Genetics

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

MYBPC3-related disorder

Benign:1

Feb 27, 2024

PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.54

CADD

Benign

0.015

DANN

Benign

0.84

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over