rs371094769
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. The variant received -4 ACMG points: 0P and 4B. BP4_Strong
The NM_203468.3(ENTPD2):c.1175G>C(p.Arg392Pro) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000795 in 1,534,118 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 16/22 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. R392W) has been classified as Uncertain significance.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_203468.3 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Likely_benign. The variant received -4 ACMG points.
Variant Effect in Transcripts
ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_203468.3. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.
Ensembl Transcripts
| Sel. | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ENTPD2 | TSL:1 MANE Select | c.1175G>C | p.Arg392Pro | missense | Exon 8 of 9 | ENSP00000347213.2 | Q9Y5L3-1 | ||
| ENTPD2 | TSL:1 | c.1150-44G>C | intron | N/A | ENSP00000312494.5 | Q9Y5L3-2 | |||
| ENTPD2 | TSL:1 | n.564G>C | non_coding_transcript_exon | Exon 1 of 2 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.000112 AC: 17AN: 152210Hom.: 0 Cov.: 34 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.000360 AC: 47AN: 130424 AF XY: 0.000295 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0000760 AC: 105AN: 1381790Hom.: 0 Cov.: 68 AF XY: 0.0000748 AC XY: 51AN XY: 681706 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.000112 AC: 17AN: 152328Hom.: 0 Cov.: 34 AF XY: 0.000188 AC XY: 14AN XY: 74488 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
ClinVar
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at