rs371221714

Variant names:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -5 ACMG points: 4P and 9B. PM1PM2BP4_StrongBP6BS1

The NM_004560.4(ROR2):c.986G>A(p.Ser329Asn) variant causes a missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000793 in 1,614,142 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 1 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 14/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00016 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.000070 ( 1 hom. )

Consequence

ROR2
NM_004560.4 missense

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:1B:5

Conservation

PhyloP100: 3.84

Variant links:

Genes affected

ROR2 (HGNC:10257): (receptor tyrosine kinase like orphan receptor 2) The protein encoded by this gene is a receptor protein tyrosine kinase and type I transmembrane protein that belongs to the ROR subfamily of cell surface receptors. The protein may be involved in the early formation of the chondrocytes and may be required for cartilage and growth plate development. Mutations in this gene can cause brachydactyly type B, a skeletal disorder characterized by hypoplasia/aplasia of distal phalanges and nails. In addition, mutations in this gene can cause the autosomal recessive form of Robinow syndrome, which is characterized by skeletal dysplasia with generalized limb bone shortening, segmental defects of the spine, brachydactyly, and a dysmorphic facial appearance. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]

ROR2 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -5 ACMG points.

PM1

In a domain Kringle (size 78) in uniprot entity ROR2_HUMAN there are 4 pathogenic changes around while only 0 benign (100%) in NM_004560.4

PM2

Very rare variant in population databases, with high coverage;

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.011142552).

BP6

Variant 9-91731107-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr9-91731107-C-T is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 159824.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=3, Benign=1, Uncertain_significance=1}.

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population eas. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.000164 (25/152286) while in subpopulation EAS AF= 0.00445 (23/5168). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00304. There are 0 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 11 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
ROR2	NM_004560.4 link	c.986G>A	p.Ser329Asn	missense_variant	Exon 7 of 9	ENST00000375708.4	NP_004551.2	Q01974

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	UniProt
ROR2	ENST00000375708.4 link	c.986G>A	p.Ser329Asn	missense_variant	Exon 7 of 9	1	NM_004560.4	ENSP00000364860.3	Q01974
ROR2	ENST00000375715.5 link	c.566G>A	p.Ser189Asn	missense_variant	Exon 7 of 13	1		ENSP00000364867.1	B1APY4
ROR2	ENST00000550066.5 link	n.1454G>A		non_coding_transcript_exon_variant	Exon 9 of 11	2

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.000164

AC:

AN:

152168

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.0000654

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00444

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.00

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.000478

GnomAD3 exomes

AF:

0.000390

AC:

AN:

251308

Hom.:

AF XY:

0.000324

AC XY:

AN XY:

135858

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.0000289

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00527

Gnomad SAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.00

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.0000705

AC:

103

AN:

1461856

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.0000619

AC XY:

AN XY:

727234

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 AMR exome

AF:

0.0000224

Gnomad4 ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS exome

AF:

0.00217

Gnomad4 SAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 OTH exome

AF:

0.000265

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.000164

AC:

AN:

152286

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000148

AC XY:

AN XY:

74460

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 AMR

AF:

0.0000653

Gnomad4 ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS

AF:

0.00445

Gnomad4 SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 OTH

AF:

0.000473

Alfa

AF:

0.000125

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.000147

ExAC

AF:

0.000387

AC:

Asia WGS

AF:

0.00260

AC:

AN:

3478

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity

Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:5

Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Autosomal recessive Robinow syndrome

Uncertain:1Benign:1

Jan 08, 2014

Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Jan 13, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. -

not provided

Benign:2

Jan 20, 2025

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Apr 01, 2021

GeneDx

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Brachydactyly type B1

Benign:1

Jan 13, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

ROR2-related disorder

Benign:1

Dec 13, 2019

PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

AlphaMissense

Benign

0.22

BayesDel_addAF

Benign

-0.41

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.35

CADD

Benign

DANN

Benign

0.66

DEOGEN2

Benign

0.049

T;T

Eigen

Benign

-0.068

Eigen_PC

Benign

-0.017

FATHMM_MKL

Uncertain

0.92

LIST_S2

Uncertain

0.91

D;D

M_CAP

Benign

0.036

MetaRNN

Benign

0.011

T;T

MetaSVM

Benign

-0.79

MutationAssessor

Benign

1.4

.;L

PrimateAI

Uncertain

0.59

PROVEAN

Benign

-1.1

N;N

REVEL

Benign

0.084

Sift

Benign

0.50

T;T

Sift4G

Benign

0.74

T;T

Polyphen

0.095

B;D

Vest4

0.64

MutPred

0.53

.;Loss of catalytic residue at S329 (P = 0.0427);

MVP

0.77

MPC

0.23

ClinPred

0.066

GERP RS

3.0

Varity_R

0.22

gMVP

0.78

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over