rs371264852

Variant names:

Your query was ambiguous. Multiple possible variants found:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -11 ACMG points: 0P and 11B. BP4_ModerateBP6BS1BS2

The NM_000455.5(STK11):c.992G>A(p.Arg331Gln) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000455 in 1,604,078 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 15/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.000053 ( 0 hom., cov: 33)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.000045 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

STK11
NM_000455.5 missense

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:7B:6

Conservation

PhyloP100: 3.25

Variant links:

Genes affected

STK11 (HGNC:11389): (serine/threonine kinase 11) The protein encoded by this gene is a serine/threonine kinase that regulates cell polarity and energy metabolism and functions as a tumor suppressor. Mutations in this gene have been associated with the autosomal dominant Peutz-Jeghers syndrome, as well as with skin, pancreatic, and testicular cancers. [provided by RefSeq, May 2022]

STK11 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -11 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.22967112).

BP6

Variant 19-1223056-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr19-1223056-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 141962.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=5, Uncertain_significance=7}. Variant chr19-1223056-G-A is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.0000526 (8/152172) while in subpopulation AFR AF= 0.000145 (6/41444). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0000628. There are 0 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 3 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 33. This position pass quality control queck.

BS2

High AC in GnomAd4 at 8 AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
STK11	NM_000455.5 link	c.992G>A	p.Arg331Gln	missense_variant	Exon 8 of 10	ENST00000326873.12	NP_000446.1	Q15831-1A0A0S2Z4D1
STK11	NM_001407255.1 link	c.992G>A	p.Arg331Gln	missense_variant	Exon 8 of 9		NP_001394184.1
STK11	NR_176325.1 link	n.2259G>A		non_coding_transcript_exon_variant	Exon 9 of 11

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	UniProt
STK11	ENST00000326873.12 link	c.992G>A	p.Arg331Gln	missense_variant	Exon 8 of 10	1	NM_000455.5	ENSP00000324856.6	Q15831-1
STK11	ENST00000652231.1 link	c.992G>A	p.Arg331Gln	missense_variant	Exon 8 of 9			ENSP00000498804.1	Q15831-2
STK11	ENST00000585748.3 link	c.620G>A	p.Arg207Gln	missense_variant	Exon 10 of 12	3		ENSP00000477641.2	A0A087WT72

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.0000526

AC:

AN:

152172

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.000145

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.0000294

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00

GnomAD3 exomes

AF:

0.0000475

AC:

AN:

231544

Hom.:

AF XY:

0.0000476

AC XY:

AN XY:

126090

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.0000738

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.0000303

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.0000584

Gnomad SAS exome

AF:

0.0000350

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.0000670

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.00

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.0000448

AC:

AN:

1451906

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.0000457

AC XY:

AN XY:

721392

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR exome

AF:

0.000150

Gnomad4 AMR exome

AF:

0.0000229

Gnomad4 ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS exome

AF:

0.0000255

Gnomad4 SAS exome

AF:

0.0000118

Gnomad4 FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE exome

AF:

0.0000478

Gnomad4 OTH exome

AF:

0.0000666

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.0000526

AC:

AN:

152172

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.0000404

AC XY:

AN XY:

74344

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR

AF:

0.000145

Gnomad4 AMR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE

AF:

0.0000294

Gnomad4 OTH

AF:

0.00

Alfa

AF:

0.0000329

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.0000378

ESP6500AA

AF:

0.00

AC:

ESP6500EA

AF:

0.000118

AC:

ExAC

AF:

0.0000498

AC:

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity

Submissions summary: Uncertain:7Benign:6

Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Peutz-Jeghers syndrome

Uncertain:5Benign:2

Jul 15, 2021

Genome-Nilou Lab

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Dec 28, 2022

St. Jude Molecular Pathology, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

The STK11 c.992G>A (p.Arg331Gln) missense change has a maximum subpopulation frequency of 0.0075% in gnomAD v2.1.1 (https://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/). The in silico tool REVEL predicts a benign effect on protein function, but to our knowledge this prediction has not been confirmed by functional studies. This variant has been reported in individuals with breast cancer (PMID: 30287823). In addition, four individuals with this variant are reported in a database of women older than 70 years of age who have never had cancer (FLOSSIES, https://whi.color.com/). To our knowledge, this variant has not been reported in individuals with Peutz-Jeghers syndrome. In summary, the evidence currently available is insufficient to determine the clinical significance of this variant. It has therefore been classified as of uncertain significance. -

May 28, 2019

Mendelics

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Sep 05, 2023

Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Jan 28, 2025

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Apr 14, 2023

Myriad Genetics, Inc.

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant is classified as a variant of uncertain significance as there is insufficient evidence to determine its impact on protein function and/or cancer risk. -

Mar 15, 2016

Counsyl

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

not specified

Uncertain:1Benign:1

Jan 03, 2023

Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

Variant summary: STK11 c.992G>A (p.Arg331Gln) results in a conservative amino acid change in the encoded protein sequence. Four of five in-silico tools predict a benign effect of the variant on protein function. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 4.8e-05 in 231544 control chromosomes. The observed variant frequency is approximately 8 fold of the estimated maximal expected allele frequency for a pathogenic variant in STK11 causing Peutz-Jeghers Syndrome phenotype (6.3e-06), strongly suggesting that the variant is benign. c.992G>A has been reported in the literature in individuals affected with colorectal cancer (Yurgelun_2017) and breast and/or ovarian cancer (Krivokuca_2022, and Momozawa_2018); however, authors classified the variant as VUS. These report(s) do not provide unequivocal conclusions about association of the variant with Peutz-Jeghers Syndrome. Co-occurrences with other pathogenic variant(s) have been reported (MLH1 c.1852_1854del, p.K618del), providing supporting evidence for a benign role (Yurgelun_2017). To our knowledge, no experimental evidence demonstrating an impact on protein function has been reported. Ten clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar after 2014 and classified the variant as VUS (n=7) and likely benign (n=3). Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as likely benign. -

Mar 04, 2025

Center for Genomic Medicine, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

not provided

Uncertain:1Benign:1

Mar 19, 2021

GeneDx

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

In silico analysis supports that this missense variant does not alter protein structure/function; This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 30287823, 28135145, 29106415) -

Aug 26, 2020

Quest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan Capistrano

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome

Benign:2

Sep 19, 2024

Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Mar 02, 2023

Ambry Genetics

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

AlphaMissense

Benign

0.067

BayesDel_addAF

Benign

-0.13

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.24

CADD

Benign

DANN

Uncertain

1.0

DEOGEN2

Benign

0.23

T;T

Eigen

Benign

-0.36

Eigen_PC

Benign

-0.28

FATHMM_MKL

Benign

0.38

LIST_S2

Uncertain

0.93

D;D

M_CAP

Benign

0.085

MetaRNN

Benign

0.23

T;T

MetaSVM

Benign

-0.64

MutationAssessor

Benign

2.0

.;M

PrimateAI

Benign

0.48

PROVEAN

Benign

0.22

.;N

REVEL

Benign

0.22

Sift

Benign

0.21

.;T

Sift4G

Benign

0.33

T;T

Polyphen

0.084

.;B

Vest4

0.41

MVP

0.73

MPC

0.045

ClinPred

0.042

GERP RS

2.7

Varity_R

0.15

gMVP

0.28

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over