rs371491059
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely pathogenic. The variant received 6 ACMG points: 6P and 0B. PM2PP3_Strong
The NM_001142800.2(EYS):c.3454G>C(p.Gly1152Arg) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00000145 in 1,375,662 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a pathogenic outcome for this variant. No clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar. Another nucleotide change resulting in the same amino acid substitution has been previously reported as Uncertain significance in ClinVar.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_001142800.2 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- EYS-related retinopathyInheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: ClinGen
- retinitis pigmentosaInheritance: AR, AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: G2P, Orphanet
- retinitis pigmentosa 25Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: Ambry Genetics, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Laboratory for Molecular Medicine
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Likely_pathogenic. The variant received 6 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Ensembl
| Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EYS | ENST00000503581.6 | c.3454G>C | p.Gly1152Arg | missense_variant | Exon 23 of 43 | 5 | NM_001142800.2 | ENSP00000424243.1 | ||
| EYS | ENST00000370621.7 | c.3454G>C | p.Gly1152Arg | missense_variant | Exon 23 of 44 | 1 | ENSP00000359655.3 | |||
| EYS | ENST00000330816.5 | n.75G>C | non_coding_transcript_exon_variant | Exon 2 of 4 | 3 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes Cov.: 32
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00000145 AC: 2AN: 1375662Hom.: 0 Cov.: 28 AF XY: 0.00000148 AC XY: 1AN XY: 677648 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 genome Cov.: 32
ClinVar
Not reported inComputational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at