rs371831239

Positions:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -14 ACMG points: 0P and 14B. BP4_StrongBP6BP7BS1BS2

The NM_000719.7(CACNA1C):c.5529T>C(p.His1843=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000117 in 1,612,300 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.000079 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.00012 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

CACNA1C
NM_000719.7 synonymous

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:1B:4

Conservation

PhyloP100: -0.740

Variant links:

Genes affected

CACNA1C (HGNC:1390): (calcium voltage-gated channel subunit alpha1 C) This gene encodes an alpha-1 subunit of a voltage-dependent calcium channel. Calcium channels mediate the influx of calcium ions into the cell upon membrane polarization. The alpha-1 subunit consists of 24 transmembrane segments and forms the pore through which ions pass into the cell. The calcium channel consists of a complex of alpha-1, alpha-2/delta, beta, and gamma subunits in a 1:1:1:1 ratio. There are multiple isoforms of each of these proteins, either encoded by different genes or the result of alternative splicing of transcripts. The protein encoded by this gene binds to and is inhibited by dihydropyridine. Alternative splicing results in many transcript variants encoding different proteins. Some of the predicted proteins may not produce functional ion channel subunits. [provided by RefSeq, Oct 2012]

CACNA1C links:

CACNA1C-AS1 (HGNC:40119): (CACNA1C antisense RNA 1)

CACNA1C-AS1 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -14 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.82).

BP6

Variant 12-2682634-T-C is Benign according to our data. Variant chr12-2682634-T-C is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 136641.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=3, Benign=1, Uncertain_significance=1}. Variant chr12-2682634-T-C is described in Lovd as [Benign].

BP7

Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-0.74 with no splicing effect.

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population mid. gnomad4_exome allele frequency = 0.000121 (177/1460288) while in subpopulation MID AF= 0.00208 (12/5762). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0012. There are 0 homozygotes in gnomad4_exome. There are 81 alleles in male gnomad4_exome subpopulation. Median coverage is 31. This position pass quality control queck.

BS2

High AC in GnomAd4 at 12 AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	#exon/exons	MANE	Protein
CACNA1C	NM_000719.7 linkuse as main transcript	c.5529T>C	p.His1843=	synonymous_variant	43/47	ENST00000399655.6	NP_000710.5
CACNA1C	NM_001167623.2 linkuse as main transcript	c.5529T>C	p.His1843=	synonymous_variant	43/47	ENST00000399603.6	NP_001161095.1
CACNA1C-AS1	NR_045725.1 linkuse as main transcript	n.334-4737A>G		intron_variant, non_coding_transcript_variant

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	#exon/exons	TSL	MANE	Protein	UniProt
CACNA1C	ENST00000399603.6 linkuse as main transcript	c.5529T>C	p.His1843=	synonymous_variant	43/47	5	NM_001167623.2	ENSP00000382512	Q13936-37
CACNA1C	ENST00000399655.6 linkuse as main transcript	c.5529T>C	p.His1843=	synonymous_variant	43/47	1	NM_000719.7	ENSP00000382563	Q13936-12
CACNA1C-AS1	ENST00000501371.5 linkuse as main transcript	n.295-4737A>G		intron_variant, non_coding_transcript_variant		2

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.0000789

AC:

AN:

152012

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.0000242

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.000196

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00633

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.0000882

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00

GnomAD3 exomes

AF:

0.000105

AC:

AN:

247298

Hom.:

AF XY:

0.000104

AC XY:

AN XY:

134188

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.000175

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS exome

AF:

0.0000986

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.000151

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.00

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.000121

AC:

177

AN:

1460288

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000112

AC XY:

AN XY:

726344

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 AMR exome

AF:

0.000202

Gnomad4 ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS exome

AF:

0.000116

Gnomad4 FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE exome

AF:

0.000123

Gnomad4 OTH exome

AF:

0.000149

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.0000789

AC:

AN:

152012

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.0000404

AC XY:

AN XY:

74236

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR

AF:

0.0000242

Gnomad4 AMR

AF:

0.000196

Gnomad4 ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE

AF:

0.0000882

Gnomad4 OTH

AF:

0.00

Alfa

AF:

0.0000759

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.000121

EpiCase

AF:

0.000382

EpiControl

AF:

0.000416

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity

Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:4

Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided

Uncertain:1Benign:1

Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga)	Sep 22, 2015	- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories	Mar 22, 2023	- -

not specified

Benign:1

Benign, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

GeneDx

Nov 19, 2013

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

Long QT syndrome

Benign:1

Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Jan 17, 2024

- -

Cardiovascular phenotype

Benign:1

Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

Ambry Genetics

Aug 24, 2016

This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.82

CADD

Benign

0.098

DANN

Benign

0.51

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.020

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over