rs371988639

Positions:

chr17-41764916-T-A

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -9 ACMG points: 0P and 9B. BP4_StrongBP6BS1

The NM_002230.4(JUP):c.1054+7A>T variant causes a splice region, intron change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000694 in 1,614,016 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 3/3 splice prediction tools predict no significant impact on normal splicing. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00045 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.000030 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

JUP
NM_002230.4 splice_region, intron

Scores

Splicing: ADA: 0.0006316

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:2B:9

Conservation

PhyloP100: -0.768

Variant links:

Genes affected

JUP (HGNC:6207): (junction plakoglobin) This gene encodes a major cytoplasmic protein which is the only known constituent common to submembranous plaques of both desmosomes and intermediate junctions. This protein forms distinct complexes with cadherins and desmosomal cadherins and is a member of the catenin family since it contains a distinct repeating amino acid motif called the armadillo repeat. Mutation in this gene has been associated with Naxos disease. Alternative splicing occurs in this gene; however, not all transcripts have been fully described. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]

JUP links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -9 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.84).

BP6

Variant 17-41764916-T-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr17-41764916-T-A is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 227446.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=5, Uncertain_significance=2, Benign=1}. Variant chr17-41764916-T-A is described in Lovd as [Benign]. Variant chr17-41764916-T-A is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.000447 (68/152152) while in subpopulation AFR AF= 0.00142 (59/41432). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00113. There are 0 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 20 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	#exon/exons	MANE	UniProt
JUP	NM_002230.4 linkuse as main transcript	c.1054+7A>T		splice_region_variant, intron_variant		ENST00000393931.8

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	Effect	TSL	MANE	Appris
JUP	ENST00000393931.8 linkuse as main transcript	c.1054+7A>T	splice_region_variant, intron_variant	1	NM_002230.4	P1
JUP	ENST00000310706.9 linkuse as main transcript	c.1054+7A>T	splice_region_variant, intron_variant	1		P1
JUP	ENST00000393930.5 linkuse as main transcript	c.1054+7A>T	splice_region_variant, intron_variant	5		P1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.000447

AC:

AN:

152152

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.00142

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.000524

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.00

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.000478

GnomAD3 exomes

AF:

0.0000836

AC:

AN:

251234

Hom.:

AF XY:

0.0000958

AC XY:

AN XY:

135764

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.00105

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.000116

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.00

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.0000301

AC:

AN:

1461864

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.0000330

AC XY:

AN XY:

727232

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR exome

AF:

0.00105

Gnomad4 AMR exome

AF:

0.0000671

Gnomad4 ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 OTH exome

AF:

0.0000994

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.000447

AC:

AN:

152152

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000269

AC XY:

AN XY:

74330

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR

AF:

0.00142

Gnomad4 AMR

AF:

0.000524

Gnomad4 ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 OTH

AF:

0.000478

Alfa

AF:

0.000130

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.000608

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity

Submissions summary: Uncertain:2Benign:9

Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified

Benign:4

Benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp	Apr 15, 2021	Variant summary: JUP c.1054+7A>T alters a non-conserved nucleotide located close to a canonical splice site and therefore could affect mRNA splicing, leading to a significantly altered protein sequence. 4/4 computational tools predict no significant impact on normal splicing. However, these predictions have yet to be confirmed by functional studies. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00011 in 282628 control chromosomes, predominantly at a frequency of 0.0011 within the African or African-American subpopulation in the gnomAD database. The observed variant frequency within African or African-American control individuals in the gnomAD database is approximately 44 fold of the estimated maximal expected allele frequency for a pathogenic variant in JUP causing Cardiomyopathy phenotype (2.5e-05), strongly suggesting that the variant is a benign polymorphism found primarily in populations of African or African-American origin. To our knowledge, no occurrence of c.1054+7A>T in individuals affected with Cardiomyopathy and no experimental evidence demonstrating its impact on protein function have been reported. Five ClinVar submitters (evaluation after 2014) cite the variant as uncertain significance (n=1) and likely benign (n=4). Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as benign. -
Benign, no assertion criteria provided	clinical testing	Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center	-	- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine	Mar 11, 2015	c.1054+7A>T in intron 6 of JUP: This variant is not expected to have clinical si gnificance because it is not located within the splice consensus sequence. It ha s been identified in 5/10400 African chromosomes by the Exome Aggregation Consor tium (ExAC, http://exac.broadinstitute.org; dbSNP rs371988639). -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	GeneDx	Jan 15, 2018	This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

not provided

Benign:2

Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories	Jan 16, 2020	- -
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided	clinical testing	Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center	-	- -

Naxos disease

Uncertain:1

Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Jan 13, 2018

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -

Arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia 12

Uncertain:1

Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Jan 13, 2018

JUP-related disorder

Benign:1

Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided

clinical testing

PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences

Nov 22, 2021

This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). -

Cardiomyopathy

Benign:1

Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

CHEO Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario

Aug 10, 2021

- -

Naxos disease;C1969081:Arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia 12

Benign:1

Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Jan 24, 2024

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.84

CADD

Benign

0.29

DANN

Benign

0.70

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

dbscSNV1_ADA

Benign

0.00063

dbscSNV1_RF

Benign

0.0040

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over