rs372045362

Variant names:

Your query was ambiguous. Multiple possible variants found:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2

The NM_000548.5(TSC2):c.3611-10G>A variant causes a intron change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000477 in 1,612,858 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 13 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00028 ( 2 hom., cov: 33)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.00050 ( 11 hom. )

Consequence

TSC2
NM_000548.5 intron

Scores

Splicing: ADA: 0.0001532

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:12O:1

Conservation

PhyloP100: -1.65

Publications

0 publications found

Variant links:

Genes affected

TSC2 (HGNC:12363): (TSC complex subunit 2) This gene is a tumor suppressor gene that encodes the growth inhibitory protein tuberin. Tuberin interacts with hamartin to form the TSC protein complex which functions in the control of cell growth. This TSC protein complex negatively regulates mammalian target of rapamycin complex 1 (mTORC1) signaling which is a major regulator of anabolic cell growth. Mutations in this gene have been associated with tuberous sclerosis and lymphangioleiomyomatosis. [provided by RefSeq, May 2022]

TSC2 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):

tuberous sclerosis
Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: ClinGen
tuberous sclerosis 2
Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: PanelApp Australia, Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), G2P, Genomics England PanelApp, Ambry Genetics
lymphangioleiomyomatosis
Inheritance: AD Classification: STRONG Submitted by: Genomics England PanelApp
tuberous sclerosis complex
Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet

TSC2 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.83).

BP6

Variant 16-2081585-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr16-2081585-G-A is described in ClinVar as Benign/Likely_benign. ClinVar VariationId is 65244.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population sas. GnomAd4 allele frequency = 0.000276 (42/152340) while in subpopulation SAS AF = 0.00765 (37/4834). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00571. There are 2 homozygotes in GnomAd4. There are 27 alleles in the male GnomAd4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 33. This position passed quality control check.

BS2

High AC in GnomAd4 at 42 AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
TSC2	NM_000548.5 link	c.3611-10G>A		intron_variant	Intron 30 of 41	ENST00000219476.9	NP_000539.2

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
TSC2	ENST00000219476.9 link	c.3611-10G>A		intron_variant	Intron 30 of 41	5	NM_000548.5	ENSP00000219476.3

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.000289

AC:

AN:

152222

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00765

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00633

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.0000588

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.000478

GnomAD2 exomes

AF:

0.00107

AC:

268

AN:

249500

AF XY:

0.00156

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.0000545

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.00000891

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.000164

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.000498

AC:

727

AN:

1460518

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000774

AC XY:

562

AN XY:

726546

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

33480

American (AMR)

AF:

0.0000224

AC:

AN:

44720

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

26136

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.0000504

AC:

AN:

39700

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.00807

AC:

696

AN:

86252

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

52122

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.000173

AC:

AN:

5766

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.0000135

AC:

AN:

1111968

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.000199

AC:

AN:

60374

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.467

Heterozygous variant carriers

147

220

294

367

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het

Exome Hom

Variant carriers

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.000276

AC:

AN:

152340

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000362

AC XY:

AN XY:

74486

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

41586

American (AMR)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

15310

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

3470

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

5186

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.00765

AC:

AN:

4834

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

10626

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

294

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.0000588

AC:

AN:

68010

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.000473

AC:

AN:

2112

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.501

Heterozygous variant carriers

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het

Genome Hom

Variant carriers

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

Alfa

AF:

0.000108

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.0000491

Asia WGS

AF:

0.00202

AC:

AN:

3478

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign

Submissions summary: Benign:12Other:1

Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Tuberous sclerosis 2

Benign:4

Jan 29, 2025

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

Nov 07, 2021

Genome-Nilou Lab

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

Jul 07, 2023

KCCC/NGS Laboratory, Kuwait Cancer Control Center

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

Jul 06, 2023

Myriad Genetics, Inc.

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is considered benign. This variant is intronic and is not expected to impact mRNA splicing. Homozygosity has been confirmed in one or more individuals. As homozygosity for pathogenic variants in this gene is generally assumed to result in embryonic lethality, this variant is unlikely to be pathogenic.

Tuberous sclerosis syndrome

Benign:3Other:1

Jan 11, 2024

All of Us Research Program, National Institutes of Health

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

Tuberous sclerosis database (TSC2)

Significance:not provided

Review Status:no classification provided

Collection Method:curation

Jan 14, 2025

Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

Jan 12, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease.

not specified

Benign:2

Mar 16, 2021

Athena Diagnostics

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

May 02, 2014

GeneDx

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease.

not provided

Benign:2

Dec 01, 2024

CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

TSC2: BS2

Mar 16, 2021

Quest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan Capistrano

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome

Benign:1

Apr 21, 2021

Sema4, Sema4

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:curation

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.83

CADD

Benign

0.31

(source)

DANN

Benign

0.36

PhyloP100

-1.6

RBP_binding_hub_radar

0.97

RBP_regulation_power_radar

3.2

Mutation Taster

=100/0

polymorphism

(source)

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

dbscSNV1_ADA

Benign

0.00015

dbscSNV1_RF

Benign

0.014

SpliceAI score (max)

0.060

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

You must be logged in to view publications. This limit was set because tens of millions (!) of queries from AI bots are generated daily.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

Publications

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

Age Distribution

Age Distribution

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

Other links and lift over