rs372349042

Variant names:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Likely benign. The variant received -6 ACMG points: 0P and 6B. BP4_StrongBP6BP7

The NM_025114.4(CEP290):c.1716A>G(p.Leu572Leu) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0002 in 1,440,628 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00096 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.00011 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

CEP290
NM_025114.4 synonymous

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:2B:4

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.643

Publications

2 publications found

Variant links:

Genes affected

CEP290 (HGNC:29021): (centrosomal protein 290) This gene encodes a protein with 13 putative coiled-coil domains, a region with homology to SMC chromosome segregation ATPases, six KID motifs, three tropomyosin homology domains and an ATP/GTP binding site motif A. The protein is localized to the centrosome and cilia and has sites for N-glycosylation, tyrosine sulfation, phosphorylation, N-myristoylation, and amidation. Mutations in this gene have been associated with Joubert syndrome and nephronophthisis and the presence of antibodies against this protein is associated with several forms of cancer. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]

CEP290 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):

CEP290-related ciliopathy
Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: ClinGen
Joubert syndrome 5
Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), G2P
Bardet-Biedl syndrome 14
Inheritance: AR Classification: STRONG, MODERATE Submitted by: Genomics England PanelApp, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
Leber congenital amaurosis 10
Inheritance: AR Classification: STRONG Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
Leber congenital amaurosis
Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
Bardet-Biedl syndrome
Inheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
Joubert syndrome with oculorenal defect
Inheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
Meckel syndrome
Inheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
Senior-Loken syndrome
Inheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet

CEP290 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Likely_benign. The variant received -6 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.75).

BP6

Variant 12-88117141-T-C is Benign according to our data. Variant chr12-88117141-T-C is described in ClinVar as Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity. ClinVar VariationId is 194894.

BP7

Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=0.643 with no splicing effect.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
CEP290	NM_025114.4 link	c.1716A>G	p.Leu572Leu	synonymous_variant	Exon 18 of 54	ENST00000552810.6	NP_079390.3	O15078Q05BJ6

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
CEP290	ENST00000552810.6 link	c.1716A>G	p.Leu572Leu	synonymous_variant	Exon 18 of 54	1	NM_025114.4	ENSP00000448012.1		O15078

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.000946

AC:

144

AN:

152168

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.00340

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.000196

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.00

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00

GnomAD2 exomes

AF:

0.000221

AC:

AN:

162980

AF XY:

0.000140

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.00359

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.0000417

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.000220

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.000110

AC:

142

AN:

1288342

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.0000810

AC XY:

AN XY:

642296

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.00403

AC:

118

AN:

29310

American (AMR)

AF:

0.0000860

AC:

AN:

34894

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

24532

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

36516

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

75970

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

49994

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

5412

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.00000102

AC:

AN:

977422

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.000368

AC:

AN:

54292

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.489

Heterozygous variant carriers

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het

Variant carriers

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.000959

AC:

146

AN:

152286

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000900

AC XY:

AN XY:

74472

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.00344

AC:

143

AN:

41542

American (AMR)

AF:

0.000196

AC:

AN:

15296

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

3470

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

5188

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

4826

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

10614

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

294

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

68034

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

2110

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.497

Heterozygous variant carriers

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het

Variant carriers

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

Alfa

AF:

0.000625

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.00119

Asia WGS

AF:

0.000866

AC:

AN:

3478

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity

Submissions summary: Uncertain:2Benign:4

Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided

Uncertain:1Benign:2

May 01, 2025

CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

CEP290: BP4, BP7 -

Jun 11, 2021

GeneDx

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 28912962) -

Sep 29, 2016

Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga)

Significance:Uncertain significance

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Leber congenital amaurosis

Uncertain:1

Apr 17, 2020

Natera, Inc.

Significance:Uncertain significance

Review Status:no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

not specified

Benign:1

Feb 25, 2016

Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Meckel-Gruber syndrome;C0431399:Joubert syndrome;C0687120:Nephronophthisis

Benign:1

Feb 02, 2025

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.75

CADD

Benign

4.1

(source)

DANN

Benign

0.76

PhyloP100

0.64

Mutation Taster

=298/2

polymorphism

(source)

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

You must be logged in to view publications. This limit was set because tens of millions (!) of queries from AI bots are generated daily.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

Publications

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

Age Distribution

Age Distribution

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

Other links and lift over