rs372453886
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2
The NM_021098.3(CACNA1H):c.6371C>T(p.Pro2124Leu) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000122 in 1,564,200 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 1 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 13/20 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_021098.3 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CACNA1H | NM_021098.3 | c.6371C>T | p.Pro2124Leu | missense_variant | 35/35 | ENST00000348261.11 | NP_066921.2 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CACNA1H | ENST00000348261.11 | c.6371C>T | p.Pro2124Leu | missense_variant | 35/35 | 1 | NM_021098.3 | ENSP00000334198 | P4 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0000789 AC: 12AN: 152168Hom.: 0 Cov.: 35
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.000270 AC: 51AN: 188816Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.000299 AC XY: 32AN XY: 107182
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000127 AC: 179AN: 1411916Hom.: 1 Cov.: 72 AF XY: 0.000164 AC XY: 115AN XY: 700544
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0000788 AC: 12AN: 152284Hom.: 0 Cov.: 35 AF XY: 0.000134 AC XY: 10AN XY: 74452
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Idiopathic generalized epilepsy;C4310756:Hyperaldosteronism, familial, type IV Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 19, 2024 | - - |
not provided Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Athena Diagnostics | May 23, 2019 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at