rs372456536
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. The variant received -3 ACMG points: 1P and 4B. PP3BS2
The NM_004304.5(ALK):c.1625C>T(p.Pro542Leu) variant causes a missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00000496 in 1,613,474 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a pathogenic outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. P542S) has been classified as Uncertain significance.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_004304.5 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- neuroblastoma, susceptibility to, 3Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: Ambry Genetics, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), ClinGen, G2P
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Likely_benign. The variant received -3 ACMG points.
Variant Effect in Transcripts
ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_004304.5. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.
Ensembl Transcripts
| Sel. | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ALK | TSL:1 MANE Select | c.1625C>T | p.Pro542Leu | missense | Exon 8 of 29 | ENSP00000373700.3 | Q9UM73 | ||
| ALK | TSL:5 | c.494C>T | p.Pro165Leu | missense | Exon 7 of 28 | ENSP00000482733.1 | A0A087WZL3 | ||
| ALK | TSL:4 | n.180C>T | non_coding_transcript_exon | Exon 2 of 5 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0000131 AC: 2AN: 152174Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.0000239 AC: 6AN: 251468 AF XY: 0.0000221 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00000411 AC: 6AN: 1461300Hom.: 0 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.00000550 AC XY: 4AN XY: 726996 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0000131 AC: 2AN: 152174Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0000135 AC XY: 1AN XY: 74344 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
ClinVar
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at