Menu
GeneBe

rs372651860

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -8 ACMG points: 2P and 10B. PM2BP4_StrongBP6BP7BS1

The NM_182894.3(VSX2):c.939T>A(p.Ala313=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000609 in 1,583,762 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Synonymous variant affecting the same amino acid position (i.e. A313A) has been classified as Likely benign.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00050 ( 0 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00062 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

VSX2
NM_182894.3 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:2B:2

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.363
Variant links:
Genes affected
VSX2 (HGNC:1975): (visual system homeobox 2) This gene encodes a homeobox protein originally described as a retina-specific transcription factor. Mutations in this gene are associated with microphthalmia, cataracts and iris abnormalities. [provided by RefSeq, Oct 2009]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -8 ACMG points.

PM2
Very rare variant in population databases, with high coverage;
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.5).
BP6
Variant 14-74260772-T-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr14-74260772-T-A is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 314203.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Uncertain_significance=2, Likely_benign=1}.
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=0.363 with no splicing effect.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population nfe. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.0005 (76/152080) while in subpopulation NFE AF= 0.000633 (43/67958). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.000482. There are 0 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 40 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 33. This position pass quality control queck.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE UniProt
VSX2NM_182894.3 linkuse as main transcriptc.939T>A p.Ala313= synonymous_variant 5/5 ENST00000261980.3

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Appris UniProt
VSX2ENST00000261980.3 linkuse as main transcriptc.939T>A p.Ala313= synonymous_variant 5/51 NM_182894.3 P1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.000500
AC:
76
AN:
151962
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
33
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.000145
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.000131
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00634
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.000189
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.000633
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.000478
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.000600
AC:
118
AN:
196808
Hom.:
0
AF XY:
0.000491
AC XY:
52
AN XY:
105812
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.000172
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.000140
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00512
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.0000579
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.000730
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.000586
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.000620
AC:
888
AN:
1431682
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.000584
AC XY:
414
AN XY:
709174
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.000212
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.000126
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00451
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.0000980
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.000652
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.000675
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.000500
AC:
76
AN:
152080
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.000538
AC XY:
40
AN XY:
74328
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.000145
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.000131
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00634
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.000189
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.000633
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.000473
Alfa
AF:
0.00108
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.000389
Asia WGS
AF:
0.000289
AC:
1
AN:
3478

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:2Benign:2
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Isolated microphthalmia 2 Uncertain:1Benign:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 12, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingInvitaeJan 22, 2024- -
Microphthalmia, isolated, with coloboma 3 Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 12, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -
Microphthalmia Benign:1
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingNatera, Inc.Apr 17, 2020- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.50
Cadd
Benign
8.3
Dann
Benign
0.69

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs372651860; hg19: chr14-74727475; COSMIC: COSV56217340; API