rs372736227
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -17 ACMG points: 0P and 17B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BS2
The NM_002834.5(PTPN11):c.48A>G(p.Ala16=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00049 in 1,614,012 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★★).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.00030 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00051 ( 0 hom. )
Consequence
PTPN11
NM_002834.5 synonymous
NM_002834.5 synonymous
Scores
2
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: -0.0330
Genes affected
PTPN11 (HGNC:9644): (protein tyrosine phosphatase non-receptor type 11) The protein encoded by this gene is a member of the protein tyrosine phosphatase (PTP) family. PTPs are known to be signaling molecules that regulate a variety of cellular processes including cell growth, differentiation, mitotic cycle, and oncogenic transformation. This PTP contains two tandem Src homology-2 domains, which function as phospho-tyrosine binding domains and mediate the interaction of this PTP with its substrates. This PTP is widely expressed in most tissues and plays a regulatory role in various cell signaling events that are important for a diversity of cell functions, such as mitogenic activation, metabolic control, transcription regulation, and cell migration. Mutations in this gene are a cause of Noonan syndrome as well as acute myeloid leukemia. [provided by RefSeq, Aug 2016]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -17 ACMG points.
BP4
?
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.58).
BP6
?
Variant 12-112446309-A-G is Benign according to our data. Variant chr12-112446309-A-G is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 44608.Status of the report is reviewed_by_expert_panel, 3 stars. Variant chr12-112446309-A-G is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].
BP7
?
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-0.033 with no splicing effect.
BS2
?
High AC in GnomAd at 45 AD gene.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PTPN11 | NM_002834.5 | c.48A>G | p.Ala16= | synonymous_variant | 2/16 | ENST00000351677.7 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PTPN11 | ENST00000351677.7 | c.48A>G | p.Ala16= | synonymous_variant | 2/16 | 1 | NM_002834.5 | A1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes ? AF: 0.000296 AC: 45AN: 152220Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 genomes
?
AF:
AC:
45
AN:
152220
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.000278 AC: 70AN: 251442Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.000324 AC XY: 44AN XY: 135896
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
70
AN:
251442
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
44
AN XY:
135896
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000510 AC: 746AN: 1461792Hom.: 0 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.000535 AC XY: 389AN XY: 727206
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
746
AN:
1461792
Hom.:
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
AC XY:
389
AN XY:
727206
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome ? AF: 0.000296 AC: 45AN: 152220Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.000296 AC XY: 22AN XY: 74368
GnomAD4 genome
?
AF:
AC:
45
AN:
152220
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
AC XY:
22
AN XY:
74368
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
EpiCase
AF:
EpiControl
AF:
ClinVar
Significance: Likely benign
Submissions summary: Uncertain:2Benign:10
Revision: reviewed by expert panel
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Uncertain:1Benign:3
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Mar 03, 2015 | - - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga) | Dec 10, 2014 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp | Oct 17, 2016 | Variant summary: The PTPN11 c.48A>G (p.Ala16Ala) variant causes a synonymous change with 4/5 splice prediction tools predict no significant impact on normal splicing and no alterations to ESE binding, although these predictions have yet to be functionally assessed. The variant of interest was observed in the large, broad control population, ExAC, with an allele frequency of 34/121402 (1/3570), which exceeds the estimated maximal expected allele frequency for a pathogenic PTPN11 variant of 1/16000, therefore, suggesting this variant is likely a benign polymorphism. In addition, a reputable clinical diagnostic laboratory cites the variant as "likely benign." Therefore, the variant of interest has been classified as Benign. - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen | Dec 01, 2022 | PTPN11: BP4, BP7 - |
RASopathy Benign:2
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Invitae | Jan 28, 2024 | - - |
Likely benign, reviewed by expert panel | curation | ClinGen RASopathy Variant Curation Expert Panel | Apr 18, 2017 | The filtering allele frequency of the c.48A>G (p.Ala16=) variant in the PTPN11 gene is 0.0284% (9/16512) of South Asian chromosomes by the Exome Aggregation Consortium, which is a high enough frequency to be classified as likely benign based on thresholds defined by the ClinGen RASopathy Expert Panel (BS1; PMID:29493581) - |
Noonan syndrome 1 Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 13, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. - |
not specified Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine | Nov 10, 2014 | p.Ala16Ala in exon 2 of PTPN11: This variant is not expected to have clinical si gnificance because it does not alter an amino acid residue and is not located wi thin the splice consensus sequence. It has been identified in 22/66740 European chromosomes by the Exome Aggregation Consortium (ExAC, http://exac.broadinstitut e.org/; dbSNP rs372736227). - |
LEOPARD syndrome 1 Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 13, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
Metachondromatosis Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 13, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
Cardiovascular phenotype Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Sep 23, 2019 | This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
Noonan syndrome and Noonan-related syndrome Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, The Hospital for Sick Children | Jan 01, 2020 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
Cadd
Benign
Dann
Benign
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at