rs372859148

Variant names:

Your query was ambiguous. Multiple possible variants found:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Likely benign. The variant received -6 ACMG points: 0P and 6B. BP4_ModerateBS2

The NM_006206.6(PDGFRA):c.2957A>G(p.Asn986Ser) variant causes a missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00000868 in 1,613,600 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 16/22 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. N986K) has been classified as Uncertain significance.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.000059 ( 0 hom., cov: 33)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.0000034 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

PDGFRA
NM_006206.6 missense

Scores

Clinical Significance

Uncertain significance criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts U:3

Conservation

PhyloP100: 6.77

Publications

1 publications found

Variant links:

Genes affected

PDGFRA (HGNC:8803): (platelet derived growth factor receptor alpha) This gene encodes a cell surface tyrosine kinase receptor for members of the platelet-derived growth factor family. These growth factors are mitogens for cells of mesenchymal origin. The identity of the growth factor bound to a receptor monomer determines whether the functional receptor is a homodimer or a heterodimer, composed of both platelet-derived growth factor receptor alpha and beta polypeptides. Studies suggest that this gene plays a role in organ development, wound healing, and tumor progression. Mutations in this gene have been associated with idiopathic hypereosinophilic syndrome, somatic and familial gastrointestinal stromal tumors, and a variety of other cancers. [provided by RefSeq, Mar 2012]

PDGFRA Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):

gastrointestinal stromal tumor
Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: ClinGen, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
polyps, multiple and recurrent inflammatory fibroid, gastrointestinal
Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, MODERATE Submitted by: Genomics England PanelApp, Ambry Genetics, G2P
congenital heart disease
Inheritance: AD Classification: LIMITED Submitted by: ClinGen
isolated cleft palate
Inheritance: Unknown Classification: LIMITED Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)

PDGFRA links:

ENSG00000282278 (HGNC:):

ENSG00000282278 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Likely_benign. The variant received -6 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.08425379).

BS2

High AC in GnomAd4 at 9 Unknown,AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
PDGFRA	NM_006206.6 link	c.2957A>G	p.Asn986Ser	missense_variant	Exon 22 of 23	ENST00000257290.10	NP_006197.1	P16234-1

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
PDGFRA	ENST00000257290.10 link	c.2957A>G	p.Asn986Ser	missense_variant	Exon 22 of 23	1	NM_006206.6	ENSP00000257290.5		P16234-1
ENSG00000282278	ENST00000507166.5 link	c.2237A>G	p.Asn746Ser	missense_variant	Exon 23 of 24	2		ENSP00000423325.1		A0A0B4J203

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.0000591

AC:

AN:

152270

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.000217

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.00

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00

GnomAD2 exomes

AF:

0.00000796

AC:

AN:

251354

AF XY:

0.0000147

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.0000615

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.00000880

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.00

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.00000342

AC:

AN:

1461330

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.00000550

AC XY:

AN XY:

727054

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.000120

AC:

AN:

33468

American (AMR)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

44724

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

26134

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

39692

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

86238

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

53418

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

5766

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

9.00e-7

AC:

AN:

1111534

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

60356

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.505

Heterozygous variant carriers

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het

Variant carriers

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.0000591

AC:

AN:

152270

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.0000538

AC XY:

AN XY:

74390

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.000217

AC:

AN:

41480

American (AMR)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

15282

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

3472

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

5200

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

4836

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

10626

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

316

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

68054

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

2092

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.464

Heterozygous variant carriers

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het

Variant carriers

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

Alfa

AF:

0.0000986

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.0000642

ESP6500AA

AF:

0.000454

AC:

ESP6500EA

AF:

0.00

AC:

ExAC

AF:

0.00000824

AC:

ClinVar

Significance: Uncertain significance

Submissions summary: Uncertain:3

Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided

Uncertain:1

Mar 21, 2023

GeneDx

Significance:Uncertain significance

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

Not observed at significant frequency in large population cohorts (gnomAD); In silico analysis supports that this missense variant does not alter protein structure/function; Has not been previously published as pathogenic or benign to our knowledge; This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 31133068) -

Gastrointestinal stromal tumor

Uncertain:1

Feb 03, 2025

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance:Uncertain significance

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This sequence change replaces asparagine, which is neutral and polar, with serine, which is neutral and polar, at codon 986 of the PDGFRA protein (p.Asn986Ser). This variant is present in population databases (rs372859148, gnomAD 0.01%). This variant has not been reported in the literature in individuals affected with PDGFRA-related conditions. ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 407433). An algorithm developed to predict the effect of missense changes on protein structure and function (PolyPhen-2) suggests that this variant¬†is likely to be tolerated. In summary, the available evidence is currently insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease. Therefore, it has been classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. -

Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome

Uncertain:1

Oct 13, 2023

Ambry Genetics

Significance:Uncertain significance

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

The p.N986S variant (also known as c.2957A>G), located in coding exon 21 of the PDGFRA gene, results from an A to G substitution at nucleotide position 2957. The asparagine at codon 986 is replaced by serine, an amino acid with highly similar properties. This amino acid position is not well conserved in available vertebrate species. In addition, this alteration is predicted to be tolerated by in silico analysis. Since supporting evidence is limited at this time, the clinical significance of this alteration remains unclear. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

AlphaMissense

Benign

0.061

BayesDel_addAF

Benign

-0.37

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.53

CADD

Benign

(source)

DANN

Benign

0.16

DEOGEN2

Benign

0.034

.;T

Eigen

Benign

-0.86

Eigen_PC

Benign

-0.73

FATHMM_MKL

Uncertain

0.94

LIST_S2

Benign

0.82

T;T

M_CAP

Benign

0.021

MetaRNN

Benign

0.084

T;T

MetaSVM

Benign

-0.98

MutationAssessor

Benign

0.29

.;N

PhyloP100

6.8

PrimateAI

Benign

0.46

PROVEAN

Benign

0.040

N;N

REVEL

Benign

0.18

Sift

Benign

0.72

T;T

Sift4G

Benign

0.75

T;T

Polyphen

0.0080

.;B

Vest4

0.31

MVP

0.19

MPC

0.028

ClinPred

0.065

GERP RS

3.3

Varity_R

0.032

gMVP

0.33

Mutation Taster

=94/6

polymorphism

(source)

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

You must be logged in to view publications. This limit was set because tens of millions (!) of queries from AI bots are generated daily.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

Publications

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

Age Distribution

Age Distribution

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

Other links and lift over