rs373023392
Positions:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -4 ACMG points: 2P and 6B. PM2BP4_StrongBP6BP7
The NM_025099.6(CTC1):c.597G>A(p.Thr199=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000235 in 1,613,984 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 1 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.00016 ( 0 hom., cov: 31)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00024 ( 1 hom. )
Consequence
CTC1
NM_025099.6 synonymous
NM_025099.6 synonymous
Scores
2
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: -4.57
Genes affected
CTC1 (HGNC:26169): (CST telomere replication complex component 1) This gene encodes a component of the CST complex. This complex plays an essential role in protecting telomeres from degradation. This protein also forms a heterodimer with the CST complex subunit STN1 to form the enzyme alpha accessory factor. This enzyme regulates DNA replication. Mutations in this gene are the cause of cerebroretinal microangiopathy with calcifications and cysts. Alternate splicing results in both coding and non-coding variants. [provided by RefSeq, Mar 2012]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -4 ACMG points.
PM2
Very rare variant in population databases, with high coverage;
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.8).
BP6
Variant 17-8238081-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr17-8238081-C-T is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 459605.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=5, Uncertain_significance=1}.
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-4.57 with no splicing effect.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CTC1 | NM_025099.6 | c.597G>A | p.Thr199= | synonymous_variant | 4/23 | ENST00000651323.1 | NP_079375.3 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CTC1 | ENST00000651323.1 | c.597G>A | p.Thr199= | synonymous_variant | 4/23 | NM_025099.6 | ENSP00000498499 | P1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.000164 AC: 25AN: 152118Hom.: 0 Cov.: 31
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
25
AN:
152118
Hom.:
Cov.:
31
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.000188 AC: 47AN: 249354Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.000237 AC XY: 32AN XY: 135294
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
47
AN:
249354
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
32
AN XY:
135294
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000243 AC: 355AN: 1461866Hom.: 1 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.000253 AC XY: 184AN XY: 727230
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
355
AN:
1461866
Hom.:
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
AC XY:
184
AN XY:
727230
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.000164 AC: 25AN: 152118Hom.: 0 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.000108 AC XY: 8AN XY: 74302
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
25
AN:
152118
Hom.:
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
AC XY:
8
AN XY:
74302
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
Asia WGS
AF:
AC:
1
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
EpiControl
AF:
ClinVar
Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:5
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
Dyskeratosis congenita Uncertain:1Benign:2
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 12, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 14, 2024 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | curation | Sema4, Sema4 | Oct 19, 2021 | - - |
not specified Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago | Aug 04, 2021 | - - |
Cerebroretinal microangiopathy with calcifications and cysts 1 Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genome-Nilou Lab | Jul 15, 2021 | - - |
not provided Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen | Oct 01, 2022 | CTC1: BP4, BP7 - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
CADD
Benign
DANN
Benign
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at