rs373024059
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -12 ACMG points: 1P and 13B. PP2BP4_StrongBP6BS1BS2
The NM_001035.3(RYR2):c.4445G>A(p.Arg1482His) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000197 in 1,606,036 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. R1482C) has been classified as Uncertain significance.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_001035.3 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -12 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RYR2 | ENST00000366574.7 | c.4445G>A | p.Arg1482His | missense_variant | Exon 34 of 105 | 1 | NM_001035.3 | ENSP00000355533.2 | ||
RYR2 | ENST00000609119.2 | n.4445G>A | non_coding_transcript_exon_variant | Exon 34 of 104 | 5 | ENSP00000499659.2 | ||||
RYR2 | ENST00000660292.2 | c.4445G>A | p.Arg1482His | missense_variant | Exon 34 of 106 | ENSP00000499787.2 | ||||
RYR2 | ENST00000659194.3 | c.4445G>A | p.Arg1482His | missense_variant | Exon 34 of 105 | ENSP00000499653.3 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.000158 AC: 24AN: 152150Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.000237 AC: 57AN: 240782Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.000283 AC XY: 37AN XY: 130786
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000201 AC: 292AN: 1453768Hom.: 0 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.000205 AC XY: 148AN XY: 722800
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.000158 AC: 24AN: 152268Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.000121 AC XY: 9AN XY: 74458
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Benign:3
- -
Has not been previously published as pathogenic or benign to our knowledge; Reported with conflicting interpretations of pathogenicity by other clinical laboratories in ClinVar (ClinVar Variant ID# 191544; Landrum et al., 2016); In silico analysis supports that this missense variant has a deleterious effect on protein structure/function; Not located in one of the three hot-spot regions of the RYR2 gene, where the majority of pathogenic missense variants occur (Medeiros-Domingo et al., 2009) -
RYR2: BS1, BS2 -
not specified Benign:2
proposed classification - variant undergoing re-assessment, contact laboratory -
Variant summary: RYR2 c.4445G>A (p.Arg1482His) results in a non-conservative amino acid change located in the B30.2/SPRY domain (IPR001870) of the encoded protein sequence. Three of five in-silico tools predict a benign effect of the variant on protein function. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00024 in 240782 control chromosomes (gnomAD). The observed variant frequency is approximately 7-fold of the estimated maximal expected allele frequency for a pathogenic variant in RYR2 causing Catecholaminergic Polymorphic Ventricular Tachycardia phenotype (3.4e-05), strongly suggesting that the variant is benign. c.4445G>A has been reported in the literature in at least one individual affected with CPVT and at least one individual affected with Brugada syndrome, however without strong evidence for causality in both cases (e.g., Landstrom_2017, Seidelmann_2017). Additionally, c.4445G>A has been reported as a "likely not pathogenic" variant in the settings of exome sequencing in the ClinSeq cohort not selected for arrhythmia, cardiomyopathy, or a family history of sudden death (example, Ng_2013). These reports do not provide unequivocal conclusions about association of the variant with Catecholaminergic Polymorphic Ventricular Tachycardia. To our knowledge, no experimental evidence demonstrating an impact on protein function has been reported. The following publications have been ascertained in the context of this evaluation (PMID: 23861362, 28404607, 28087566). Seven ClinVar submitters (evaluation after 2014) have cited the variant; 6 submitters classified the variant as likely benign and one submitter classified the variant as VUS. Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as likely benign. -
Catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia 1 Benign:2
- -
This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. -
Arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia 2 Uncertain:1
This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -
Cardiomyopathy Benign:1
- -
Cardiovascular phenotype Benign:1
This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at