rs3730297

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -8 ACMG points: 0P and 8B. BA1

This summary comes from the ClinGen Evidence Repository: The filtering allele frequency of the c.1941C>T (p.Val647=) variant in the RAF1 gene is 1.04% (738/66732) of European chromosomes by the Exome Aggregation Consortium, which is a high enough frequency to be classified as benign based on thresholds defined by the ClinGen RASopathy Expert Panel (BA1; PMID:29493581) LINK:https://erepo.genome.network/evrepo/ui/classification/CA134718/MONDO:0021060/004

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0070 ( 3 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0098 ( 86 hom. )

Consequence

RAF1
NM_002880.4 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign reviewed by expert panel B:14O:1

Conservation

PhyloP100: 1.18
Variant links:
Genes affected
RAF1 (HGNC:9829): (Raf-1 proto-oncogene, serine/threonine kinase) This gene is the cellular homolog of viral raf gene (v-raf). The encoded protein is a MAP kinase kinase kinase (MAP3K), which functions downstream of the Ras family of membrane associated GTPases to which it binds directly. Once activated, the cellular RAF1 protein can phosphorylate to activate the dual specificity protein kinases MEK1 and MEK2, which in turn phosphorylate to activate the serine/threonine specific protein kinases, ERK1 and ERK2. Activated ERKs are pleiotropic effectors of cell physiology and play an important role in the control of gene expression involved in the cell division cycle, apoptosis, cell differentiation and cell migration. Mutations in this gene are associated with Noonan syndrome 5 and LEOPARD syndrome 2. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]
MKRN2 (HGNC:7113): (makorin ring finger protein 2) This gene encodes a probable E3 ubiquitin ligase containing several zinc finger domains, that is a member of the makorin RING zinc-finger protein family. This gene overlaps the v-raf-1 murine leukemia viral oncogene homolog 1 (RAF1) gene in an antisense orientation and may have a co-regulatory function with RAF1. Alternative splicing results in multiple transcript variants. [provided by RefSeq, Nov 2012]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -8 ACMG points.

BA1
For more information check the summary or visit ClinGen Evidence Repository.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
RAF1NM_002880.4 linkc.1941C>T p.Val647Val synonymous_variant Exon 17 of 17 ENST00000251849.9 NP_002871.1 P04049-1L7RRS6

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
RAF1ENST00000251849.9 linkc.1941C>T p.Val647Val synonymous_variant Exon 17 of 17 1 NM_002880.4 ENSP00000251849.4 P04049-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.00703
AC:
1070
AN:
152194
Hom.:
3
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.00179
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.0102
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00576
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00186
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00838
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.0103
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.0100
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.00679
AC:
1705
AN:
251226
AF XY:
0.00671
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00135
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00457
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00735
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.0000544
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00726
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.0105
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00946
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.00977
AC:
14286
AN:
1461886
Hom.:
86
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.00945
AC XY:
6873
AN XY:
727246
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.00102
AC:
34
AN:
33480
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.00445
AC:
199
AN:
44724
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00677
AC:
177
AN:
26136
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.0000252
AC:
1
AN:
39700
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.00180
AC:
155
AN:
86258
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00831
AC:
444
AN:
53420
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.0115
AC:
12783
AN:
1112004
Gnomad4 Remaining exome
AF:
0.00783
AC:
473
AN:
60396
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
809
1618
2428
3237
4046
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance
Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
488
976
1464
1952
2440
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.00703
AC:
1070
AN:
152312
Hom.:
3
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.00667
AC XY:
497
AN XY:
74490
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.00178
AC:
0.0017803
AN:
0.0017803
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.0101
AC:
0.0101373
AN:
0.0101373
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00576
AC:
0.00576369
AN:
0.00576369
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
0
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00186
AC:
0.00186335
AN:
0.00186335
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00838
AC:
0.00837884
AN:
0.00837884
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.0103
AC:
0.0103184
AN:
0.0103184
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00993
AC:
0.00993377
AN:
0.00993377
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
52
104
156
208
260
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance
Genome Het
Genome Hom
Variant carriers
0
20
40
60
80
100
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.00878
Hom.:
9
Bravo
AF:
0.00652
Asia WGS
AF:
0.000577
AC:
2
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.0100
EpiControl
AF:
0.00966

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:14Other:1
Revision: reviewed by expert panel
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:4
Apr 09, 2025
Molecular Diagnostic Laboratory for Inherited Cardiovascular Disease, Montreal Heart Institute
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

May 11, 2009
Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jan 12, 2012
GeneDx
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

-
PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

not provided Benign:3Other:1
-
Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:not provided

- -

Apr 01, 2025
CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

MKRN2: BS1, BS2; RAF1: BP4, BS1, BS2 -

-
GenomeConnect - CFC International
Significance:not provided
Review Status:no classification provided
Collection Method:phenotyping only

Variant interpreted as Benign and reported on 04-30-2009 by Lab or GTR ID 239772. GenomeConnect-CFC International assertions are reported exactly as they appear on the patient-provided report from the testing laboratory. Registry team members make no attempt to reinterpret the clinical significance of the variant. -

Nov 20, 2024
ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

RASopathy Benign:3
Feb 03, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Baylor Genetics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

Variant classified using ACMG guidelines -

Apr 18, 2017
ClinGen RASopathy Variant Curation Expert Panel
Significance:Benign
Review Status:reviewed by expert panel
Collection Method:curation

The filtering allele frequency of the c.1941C>T (p.Val647=) variant in the RAF1 gene is 1.04% (738/66732) of European chromosomes by the Exome Aggregation Consortium, which is a high enough frequency to be classified as benign based on thresholds defined by the ClinGen RASopathy Expert Panel (BA1; PMID:29493581) -

LEOPARD syndrome 2 Benign:1
Jan 12, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Cardiovascular phenotype Benign:1
Dec 08, 2014
Ambry Genetics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Noonan syndrome and Noonan-related syndrome Benign:1
Jul 08, 2021
Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, The Hospital for Sick Children
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Noonan syndrome 5 Benign:1
Jan 12, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.54
CADD
Benign
4.3
DANN
Benign
0.58
Mutation Taster
=100/0
polymorphism

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs3730297; hg19: chr3-12626019; API