Menu
GeneBe

rs373056282

Variant summary

Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -1 ACMG points: 0P and 1B. BP4

The NM_000256.3(MYBPC3):c.2882C>T(p.Pro961Leu) variant causes a missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000538 in 1,578,686 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (β˜…β˜…). Synonymous variant affecting the same amino acid position (i.e. P961P) has been classified as Likely benign.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.000092 ( 0 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.000050 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

MYBPC3
NM_000256.3 missense

Scores

3
10
7

Clinical Significance

Uncertain significance criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts U:12

Conservation

PhyloP100: 6.28
Variant links:
Genes affected
MYBPC3 (HGNC:7551): (myosin binding protein C3) MYBPC3 encodes the cardiac isoform of myosin-binding protein C. Myosin-binding protein C is a myosin-associated protein found in the cross-bridge-bearing zone (C region) of A bands in striated muscle. MYBPC3 is expressed exclusively in heart muscle and is a key regulator of cardiac contraction. Mutations in this gene are a frequent cause of familial hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. [provided by RefSeq, May 2022]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -1 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.31761366).

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE UniProt
MYBPC3NM_000256.3 linkuse as main transcriptc.2882C>T p.Pro961Leu missense_variant 27/35 ENST00000545968.6

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Appris UniProt
MYBPC3ENST00000545968.6 linkuse as main transcriptc.2882C>T p.Pro961Leu missense_variant 27/355 NM_000256.3 P4Q14896-1
MYBPC3ENST00000399249.6 linkuse as main transcriptc.2882C>T p.Pro961Leu missense_variant 26/345 A2

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.0000920
AC:
14
AN:
152206
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
33
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.000145
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.0000655
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.000621
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00316
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.0000441
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.0000530
AC:
12
AN:
226206
Hom.:
0
AF XY:
0.0000569
AC XY:
7
AN XY:
122932
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.000137
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.0000320
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.000224
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.0000292
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.0000498
AC:
71
AN:
1426362
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.0000496
AC XY:
35
AN XY:
705672
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.000185
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.0000239
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.000307
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.0000330
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.00
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.0000919
AC:
14
AN:
152324
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.000107
AC XY:
8
AN XY:
74484
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.000144
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.0000654
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.000621
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.0000441
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00
Alfa
AF:
0.000275
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.0000907
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.000254
AC:
1
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
ExAC
AF:
0.0000662
AC:
8

ClinVar

Significance: Uncertain significance
Submissions summary: Uncertain:12
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided Uncertain:3
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxJul 05, 2023In silico analysis supports that this missense variant has a deleterious effect on protein structure/function; This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 20800588, 23299917, 25637381, 27532257, 12403824, 19858127, 33297573, 20031618, 34486814, 26582918) -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP LaboratoriesJul 06, 2017The p.Pro961Leu variant (rs373056282) was reported by Kaski et al. (2009) in one individual with mild concentric LV hypertrophy in a cohort of patients with early onset HCM. Using a wide pool of participants from NHLBI Exome Sequencing Project many previously disease associated variants, including p.Pro961Leu, were classified as uncertain significance (Andreasen et al. 2013 and Amendola et al. 2015). This is further confirmed by Walsh et al. (2017) classification of p.Pro961Leu as uncertain significance, given the overall population frequency of 0.005 percent (identified on 5 out of 103876 chromosomes) from the Exome Aggregation Consortium. The proline at position 961 is highly conserved and computational analyses of the effects of the p.Pro961Leu variant on protein structure and function is conflicting (SIFT: damaging, MutationTaster: disease causing, PolyPhen-2: benign). Altogether, there is not enough evidence to classify the p.Pro961Leu variant with certainty. -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGreenwood Genetic Center Diagnostic Laboratories, Greenwood Genetic CenterAug 05, 2021PM2 -
Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy Uncertain:3
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLaboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized MedicineApr 04, 2019The p.Pro961Leu variant in MYBPC3 has been reported in 2 individuals with HCM (Kaski 2009, Millat 2010), and has been identified by our laboratory in two African American individuals with HCM, one of whom carried a pathogenic variant in MYH7. This variant has also been identified in 1/8550 African and 3/9792 South Asian chromosomes by the Exome Aggregation Consortium (ExAC, http://exac.broadinstitute.org; dbSNP rs373056282). Proline (Pro) at position 961 is not conserved in evolution and 3 mammals (chinchilla, brush-tailed rat, and platypus) carry a leucine (Leu), supporting that this change may be tolerated. In summary, due to the presence of conflicting data, the clinical significance of the p.Pro961Leu variant is uncertain. -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAll of Us Research Program, National Institutes of HealthJan 11, 2024This missense variant replaces proline with leucine at codon 961 of the MYBPC3 protein. Computational prediction suggests that this variant may not impact protein structure and function (internally defined REVEL score threshold <= 0.5, PMID: 27666373). To our knowledge, functional studies have not been reported for this variant. This variant has been reported in individuals affected with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (PMID: 20031618, 27532257, 33297573). This variant has been identified in 13/257588 chromosomes in the general population by the Genome Aggregation Database (gnomAD). The available evidence is insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease conclusively. Therefore, this variant is classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingInvitaeJan 03, 2024This sequence change replaces proline, which is neutral and non-polar, with leucine, which is neutral and non-polar, at codon 961 of the MYBPC3 protein (p.Pro961Leu). This variant is present in population databases (rs373056282, gnomAD 0.02%). This missense change has been observed in individual(s) with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (PMID: 20031618, 27532257, 33297573). ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 42665). Algorithms developed to predict the effect of missense changes on protein structure and function output the following: SIFT: "Not Available"; PolyPhen-2: "Benign"; Align-GVGD: "Not Available". The leucine amino acid residue is found in multiple mammalian species, which suggests that this missense change does not adversely affect protein function. In summary, the available evidence is currently insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease. Therefore, it has been classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. -
Cardiomyopathy Uncertain:2
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCHEO Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, Children's Hospital of Eastern OntarioAug 31, 2022- -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingColor Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color HealthMay 05, 2023This missense variant replaces proline with leucine at codon 961 of the MYBPC3 protein. Computational prediction suggests that this variant may not impact protein structure and function (internally defined REVEL score threshold <= 0.5, PMID: 27666373). To our knowledge, functional studies have not been reported for this variant. This variant has been reported in individuals affected with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (PMID: 20031618, 27532257, 33297573). This variant has been identified in 13/257588 chromosomes in the general population by the Genome Aggregation Database (gnomAD). The available evidence is insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease conclusively. Therefore, this variant is classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. -
not specified Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingStanford Center for Inherited Cardiovascular Disease, Stanford UniversityJan 29, 2014Note this variant was found in clinical genetic testing performed by one or more labs who may also submit to ClinVar. Thus any internal case data may overlap with the internal case data of other labs. The interpretation reviewed below is that of the Stanford Center for Inherited Cardiovascular Disease. p.Pro961Leu (c.2882C>T) in MYBPC3 Given the type of variant, the co-occurrence with other pathogenic variants, and the uncertain phenotype of several of the individuals with the variant, we consider this variant a variant of uncertain significance and do not feel it is appropriate for predictive genetic testing. It is possible the variant may behave as a modifier. The variant has been seen in at least 3 unrelated cases of HCM, at least 2 of 3 had another pathogenic variant (not including this patient's family). It has also been seen in someone with left ventricular hypertrophy and a family history of sudden death and HCM. The variant has also been seen in multiple people not selected for HCM. Kaski et al (2009) observed the variant in one ""non-white"" patient with mild, concentric left ventricular hypertrophy, identified after the sudden death of his sibling with autopsy diagnosis of HCM. DNA was not available on sister to check for the variant. Father carried the variant and had normal echo but abnormal ECG. No other family history of medical history is provided. The authors note that 5 subjects had multiple variants but they don’t specific which subjects or variants. Millat et al (2010) reported the variant in a validation study of a high resolution melting technique for identification of variants in HCM patients. The patients came from their French cohort. Bick et al (2012) observed the variant in two individuals in the Jackson Heart Study, who were not selected for HCM. Left ventricular wall thickness was available on one of them, 0.9 cm. LMM has a ClinVar entry, SCV000059186, with an assertion of variant of uncertain significance. They note that they have seen the variant in two Black individuals with HCM and both had another variant classified as pathogenic or likely pathogenic. UW Medical Genetics has a ClinVar entry as well, SCV000190397, with an assertion of variant of uncertain significance. No specific data was shared and it was noted this was observed in research. Bick et al (2012) observed the variant in two individuals in the Jackson Heart Study. left ventricular wall thickness was available on one of them, 0.9 cm. In the supplemental data it specifies that the variant of interest (MYBPC3 p.Pro961Leu (c.2882C>T)) was found in one individual, age 42, who had one physical risk factor that was examined in this study. These risk factors included hyperlipidemia, hypertension, obesity, or diabetes. No other information was provided for this individual. The second subject identified to carry this variant was age 53 and had the following cardiac phenotype: LV wall thickness 0.9cm, LV diastolic diameter 4.93cm, L atrial diameter 3.6cm, fractional shortening 0.28, no risk factors. Note these individuals may overlap with the data from ExAC, reviewed below. Other variants have been reported in association with disease at nearby codons (p.Thr957Ser, p.Thr958Ile, p.Arg970Gln (per lab report summary of HGMD data)). The variant was reported online in 5 of 52,333 individuals in the Exome Aggregation Consortium dataset (http://exac.broadinstitute.org/), which currently includes variant calls on ~64,000 individuals of European, African, Latino and Asian descent (as of December 2016). The phenotype of those individuals is not publicly available. The dataset is comprised of multiple cohorts, some of which were recruited from the general population, others were enriched for common cardiovascular disease. Note that other variants with strong evidence for pathogenicity have been seen at similar frequencies in this dataset so this does not necessarily rule out pathogenicity (Pan et al 2012)." -
Primary familial hypertrophic cardiomyopathy Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria providedresearchCSER _CC_NCGL, University of WashingtonJun 01, 2014- -
Cardiovascular phenotype Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAmbry GeneticsOct 06, 2020The c.2882C>T (p.P961L) alteration is located in exon 27 (coding exon 27) of the MYBPC3 gene. This alteration results from a C to T substitution at nucleotide position 2882, causing the proline (P) at amino acid position 961 to be replaced by a leucine (L). Based on insufficient or conflicting evidence, the clinical significance of this alteration remains unclear. -
Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy 1 Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingMolecular Diagnostic Laboratory for Inherited Cardiovascular Disease, Montreal Heart InstituteMar 09, 2020- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Uncertain
0.40
CardioboostCm
Benign
0.0018
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.021
T
BayesDel_noAF
Uncertain
0.020
Cadd
Uncertain
24
Dann
Uncertain
1.0
DEOGEN2
Uncertain
0.79
D;T;T
Eigen
Uncertain
0.42
Eigen_PC
Uncertain
0.41
FATHMM_MKL
Pathogenic
0.98
D
LIST_S2
Uncertain
0.88
D;D;D
M_CAP
Pathogenic
0.33
D
MetaRNN
Benign
0.32
T;T;T
MetaSVM
Benign
-0.58
T
MutationAssessor
Uncertain
2.2
M;.;.
MutationTaster
Benign
1.0
D;D;D
PrimateAI
Benign
0.44
T
PROVEAN
Pathogenic
-7.2
D;.;D
REVEL
Uncertain
0.42
Sift
Uncertain
0.0010
D;.;D
Sift4G
Benign
0.064
T;T;T
Vest4
0.35
MVP
0.87
MPC
0.25
ClinPred
0.57
D
GERP RS
4.2
Varity_R
0.39
gMVP
0.73

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.010
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs373056282; hg19: chr11-47356616; API