rs3731752

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBA1

The NM_001267550.2(TTN):​c.102833G>T​(p.Gly34278Val) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0293 in 1,613,856 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 1,443 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.041 ( 212 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.028 ( 1231 hom. )

Consequence

TTN
NM_001267550.2 missense

Scores

3
5
8

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:21

Conservation

PhyloP100: 7.88

Publications

23 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
TTN (HGNC:12403): (titin) This gene encodes a large abundant protein of striated muscle. The product of this gene is divided into two regions, a N-terminal I-band and a C-terminal A-band. The I-band, which is the elastic part of the molecule, contains two regions of tandem immunoglobulin domains on either side of a PEVK region that is rich in proline, glutamate, valine and lysine. The A-band, which is thought to act as a protein-ruler, contains a mixture of immunoglobulin and fibronectin repeats, and possesses kinase activity. An N-terminal Z-disc region and a C-terminal M-line region bind to the Z-line and M-line of the sarcomere, respectively, so that a single titin molecule spans half the length of a sarcomere. Titin also contains binding sites for muscle associated proteins so it serves as an adhesion template for the assembly of contractile machinery in muscle cells. It has also been identified as a structural protein for chromosomes. Alternative splicing of this gene results in multiple transcript variants. Considerable variability exists in the I-band, the M-line and the Z-disc regions of titin. Variability in the I-band region contributes to the differences in elasticity of different titin isoforms and, therefore, to the differences in elasticity of different muscle types. Mutations in this gene are associated with familial hypertrophic cardiomyopathy 9, and autoantibodies to titin are produced in patients with the autoimmune disease scleroderma. [provided by RefSeq, Feb 2012]
TTN-AS1 (HGNC:44124): (TTN antisense RNA 1) This gene encodes a non-coding RNA transcribed from the opposite strand to the titin gene. [provided by RefSeq, Aug 2016]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.0017593205).
BP6
Variant 2-178533782-C-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr2-178533782-C-A is described in ClinVar as Benign/Likely_benign. ClinVar VariationId is 47655.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (EAS) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.155 is higher than 0.05.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
TTNNM_001267550.2 linkc.102833G>T p.Gly34278Val missense_variant Exon 358 of 363 ENST00000589042.5 NP_001254479.2 A0A0A0MTS7

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
TTNENST00000589042.5 linkc.102833G>T p.Gly34278Val missense_variant Exon 358 of 363 5 NM_001267550.2 ENSP00000467141.1 A0A0A0MTS7

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.0409
AC:
6224
AN:
152086
Hom.:
212
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.0704
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00879
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.0387
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.0415
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.165
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.0452
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00236
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.0316
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.0198
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.0540
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.0393
AC:
9800
AN:
249144
AF XY:
0.0392
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.0700
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.0312
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.0417
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.176
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00348
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.0203
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.0382
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.0281
AC:
41023
AN:
1461652
Hom.:
1231
Cov.:
40
AF XY:
0.0284
AC XY:
20686
AN XY:
727108
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.0708
AC:
2371
AN:
33476
American (AMR)
AF:
0.0330
AC:
1475
AN:
44720
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.0425
AC:
1110
AN:
26136
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.179
AC:
7095
AN:
39696
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.0470
AC:
4053
AN:
86256
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00331
AC:
177
AN:
53394
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.0784
AC:
452
AN:
5768
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.0199
AC:
22125
AN:
1111834
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.0359
AC:
2165
AN:
60372
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.482
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
2859
5717
8576
11434
14293
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
986
1972
2958
3944
4930
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.0410
AC:
6236
AN:
152204
Hom.:
212
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.0407
AC XY:
3025
AN XY:
74400
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.0705
AC:
2925
AN:
41516
American (AMR)
AF:
0.0388
AC:
593
AN:
15298
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.0415
AC:
144
AN:
3472
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.164
AC:
849
AN:
5162
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.0454
AC:
219
AN:
4820
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00236
AC:
25
AN:
10606
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.0340
AC:
10
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.0198
AC:
1348
AN:
68012
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.0544
AC:
115
AN:
2114
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.503
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
310
620
930
1240
1550
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Genome Hom
Variant carriers
0
78
156
234
312
390
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.0301
Hom.:
544
Bravo
AF:
0.0449
TwinsUK
AF:
0.0205
AC:
76
ALSPAC
AF:
0.0189
AC:
73
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.0644
AC:
245
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.0198
AC:
163
ExAC
AF:
0.0392
AC:
4732
Asia WGS
AF:
0.0950
AC:
328
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.0246
EpiControl
AF:
0.0284

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:21
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:8
Mar 11, 2024
Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Apr 09, 2025
Molecular Diagnostic Laboratory for Inherited Cardiovascular Disease, Montreal Heart Institute
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jan 27, 2014
Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga)
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Oct 31, 2012
GeneDx
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

-
Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

May 23, 2012
Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Aug 15, 2013
Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Autosomal recessive limb-girdle muscular dystrophy type 2J Benign:2
Sep 10, 2021
Genome-Nilou Lab
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Early-onset myopathy with fatal cardiomyopathy Benign:2
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Sep 10, 2021
Genome-Nilou Lab
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

not provided Benign:2
-
Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:not provided

- -

-
Laboratory of Diagnostic Genome Analysis, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC)
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Myopathy, myofibrillar, 9, with early respiratory failure Benign:2
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Sep 10, 2021
Genome-Nilou Lab
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Tibial muscular dystrophy Benign:2
Sep 10, 2021
Genome-Nilou Lab
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Autosomal recessive limb-girdle muscular dystrophy type 2J;C1858763:Dilated cardiomyopathy 1G Benign:1
Feb 04, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Dilated cardiomyopathy 1G Benign:1
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Cardiovascular phenotype Benign:1
Jan 16, 2013
Ambry Genetics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Pathogenic
0.61
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.35
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.14
CADD
Benign
21
DANN
Benign
0.90
Eigen
Uncertain
0.52
Eigen_PC
Uncertain
0.62
FATHMM_MKL
Pathogenic
0.99
D
LIST_S2
Uncertain
0.95
D;D;D;.;D;D;D
MetaRNN
Benign
0.0018
T;T;T;T;T;T;T
MetaSVM
Benign
-0.87
T
MutationAssessor
Benign
-0.28
.;.;.;N;.;.;N
PhyloP100
7.9
PrimateAI
Uncertain
0.74
T
PROVEAN
Pathogenic
-6.1
D;D;.;.;D;D;.
REVEL
Uncertain
0.48
Sift
Benign
0.045
D;T;.;.;T;T;.
Polyphen
1.0
.;.;.;D;.;.;D
Vest4
0.45
MPC
0.51
ClinPred
0.041
T
GERP RS
5.6
Mutation Taster
=89/11
polymorphism (auto)

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs3731752; hg19: chr2-179398509; COSMIC: COSV60296493; COSMIC: COSV60296493; API