rs373307908

Variant summary

Our verdict is Likely benign. The variant received -1 ACMG points: 0P and 1B. BP4

The NM_025114.4(CEP290):​c.5284C>T​(p.Arg1762Cys) variant causes a missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000437 in 1,600,728 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. R1762H) has been classified as Uncertain significance.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00011 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.000037 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

CEP290
NM_025114.4 missense

Scores

2
6
11

Clinical Significance

Uncertain significance criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts U:14

Conservation

PhyloP100: 7.19

Publications

2 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
CEP290 (HGNC:29021): (centrosomal protein 290) This gene encodes a protein with 13 putative coiled-coil domains, a region with homology to SMC chromosome segregation ATPases, six KID motifs, three tropomyosin homology domains and an ATP/GTP binding site motif A. The protein is localized to the centrosome and cilia and has sites for N-glycosylation, tyrosine sulfation, phosphorylation, N-myristoylation, and amidation. Mutations in this gene have been associated with Joubert syndrome and nephronophthisis and the presence of antibodies against this protein is associated with several forms of cancer. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]
CEP290 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • CEP290-related ciliopathy
    Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: ClinGen
  • Joubert syndrome 5
    Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), G2P
  • Bardet-Biedl syndrome 14
    Inheritance: AR Classification: STRONG, MODERATE Submitted by: Genomics England PanelApp, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
  • Leber congenital amaurosis 10
    Inheritance: AR Classification: STRONG Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
  • Leber congenital amaurosis
    Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
  • Bardet-Biedl syndrome
    Inheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
  • Joubert syndrome with oculorenal defect
    Inheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
  • Meckel syndrome
    Inheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
  • Senior-Loken syndrome
    Inheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Likely_benign. The variant received -1 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.27059683).

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
CEP290NM_025114.4 linkc.5284C>T p.Arg1762Cys missense_variant Exon 39 of 54 ENST00000552810.6 NP_079390.3

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
CEP290ENST00000552810.6 linkc.5284C>T p.Arg1762Cys missense_variant Exon 39 of 54 1 NM_025114.4 ENSP00000448012.1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.000105
AC:
16
AN:
151702
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.0000242
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.000526
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.000386
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.000208
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.0000294
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.000959
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.0000378
AC:
9
AN:
238350
AF XY:
0.0000308
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.0000683
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.0000632
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.000118
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.000354
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.0000373
AC:
54
AN:
1449026
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.0000375
AC XY:
27
AN XY:
720306
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.0000612
AC:
2
AN:
32706
American (AMR)
AF:
0.0000704
AC:
3
AN:
42634
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
25950
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.0000516
AC:
2
AN:
38778
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.000132
AC:
11
AN:
83236
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
53232
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
5738
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.0000208
AC:
23
AN:
1106898
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.000217
AC:
13
AN:
59854
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.468
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
3
6
9
12
15
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Variant carriers
0
2
4
6
8
10
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.000105
AC:
16
AN:
151702
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.000108
AC XY:
8
AN XY:
74032
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.0000242
AC:
1
AN:
41254
American (AMR)
AF:
0.000526
AC:
8
AN:
15210
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
3468
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.000386
AC:
2
AN:
5178
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.000208
AC:
1
AN:
4810
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
10478
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
314
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.0000294
AC:
2
AN:
67992
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.000959
AC:
2
AN:
2086
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.525
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
1
2
4
5
6
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Variant carriers
0
2
4
6
8
10
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.0000661
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.0000642
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.000122
AC:
1
ExAC
AF:
0.0000248
AC:
3
Asia WGS
AF:
0.00289
AC:
10
AN:
3478

ClinVar

Significance: Uncertain significance
Submissions summary: Uncertain:14
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided Uncertain:2
Jun 10, 2014
Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga)
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jun 02, 2015
Center for Pediatric Genomic Medicine, Children's Mercy Hospital and Clinics
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Inborn genetic diseases Uncertain:1
Mar 18, 2024
Ambry Genetics
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

The c.5284C>T (p.R1762C) alteration is located in exon 39 (coding exon 38) of the CEP290 gene. This alteration results from a C to T substitution at nucleotide position 5284, causing the arginine (R) at amino acid position 1762 to be replaced by a cysteine (C). Based on insufficient or conflicting evidence, the clinical significance of this alteration remains unclear. -

Senior-Loken syndrome 6 Uncertain:1
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -

Senior-Loken syndrome 6;C1857780:Joubert syndrome 5;C1970161:Meckel syndrome, type 4 Uncertain:1
Feb 22, 2021
New York Genome Center
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

CEP290-related disorder Uncertain:1
Mar 01, 2024
PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

The CEP290 c.5284C>T variant is predicted to result in the amino acid substitution p.Arg1762Cys. This variant in the homozygous condition was reported as uncertain in one individual with ciliopathy (Best et al. 2022. PubMed ID: 35764379). This variant is reported in 0.016% of alleles in individuals of East Asian descent in gnomAD. A different substitution affecting the same amino acid (p.Arg1762His) was reported in a cohort study of patients with suspected retinitis pigmentosa (Table S2, Gao. 2019. PubMed ID: 31054281). At this time, the clinical significance of this variant is uncertain due to the absence of conclusive functional and genetic evidence. -

Meckel-Gruber syndrome;C0431399:Joubert syndrome;C0687120:Nephronophthisis Uncertain:1
Oct 24, 2022
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This sequence change replaces arginine, which is basic and polar, with cysteine, which is neutral and slightly polar, at codon 1762 of the CEP290 protein (p.Arg1762Cys). This variant is present in population databases (rs373307908, gnomAD 0.007%). This variant has not been reported in the literature in individuals affected with CEP290-related conditions. ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 197084). Advanced modeling of protein sequence and biophysical properties (such as structural, functional, and spatial information, amino acid conservation, physicochemical variation, residue mobility, and thermodynamic stability) performed at Invitae indicates that this missense variant is not expected to disrupt CEP290 protein function. In summary, the available evidence is currently insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease. Therefore, it has been classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. -

Leber congenital amaurosis Uncertain:1
Jan 07, 2020
Natera, Inc.
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Leber congenital amaurosis 10 Uncertain:1
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -

Bardet-Biedl syndrome 14 Uncertain:1
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -

Meckel syndrome, type 4 Uncertain:1
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -

Retinal dystrophy Uncertain:1
Oct 01, 2023
Dept Of Ophthalmology, Nagoya University
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:research

- -

Senior-Loken syndrome 6;C1857780:Joubert syndrome 5;C1857821:Leber congenital amaurosis 10;C1970161:Meckel syndrome, type 4;C2673874:Bardet-Biedl syndrome 14 Uncertain:1
Mar 30, 2022
Fulgent Genetics, Fulgent Genetics
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Joubert syndrome 5 Uncertain:1
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.22
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.099
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.20
CADD
Pathogenic
31
DANN
Pathogenic
1.0
DEOGEN2
Benign
0.37
.;.;T
Eigen
Uncertain
0.59
Eigen_PC
Uncertain
0.63
FATHMM_MKL
Pathogenic
0.97
D
LIST_S2
Uncertain
0.95
D;D;D
M_CAP
Benign
0.074
D
MetaRNN
Benign
0.27
T;T;T
MetaSVM
Benign
-0.53
T
MutationAssessor
Benign
1.6
.;.;L
PhyloP100
7.2
PrimateAI
Benign
0.28
T
PROVEAN
Benign
-2.0
N;D;N
REVEL
Uncertain
0.31
Sift
Uncertain
0.015
D;D;D
Sift4G
Uncertain
0.017
D;D;D
Polyphen
1.0
.;.;D
Vest4
0.53
MVP
0.84
MPC
0.30
ClinPred
0.24
T
GERP RS
5.2
Varity_R
0.14
gMVP
0.23
Mutation Taster
=76/24
polymorphism

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs373307908; hg19: chr12-88472949; COSMIC: COSV100467751; API