rs373465241

Positions:

chr9-132910616-G-A

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -16 ACMG points: 0P and 16B. BP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2

The NM_000368.5(TSC1):c.1218C>T(p.Tyr406=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000136 in 1,614,108 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 2 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.000072 ( 0 hom., cov: 31)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.00014 ( 2 hom. )

Consequence

TSC1
NM_000368.5 synonymous

Scores

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:12

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.171

Variant links:

Genes affected

TSC1 (HGNC:12362): (TSC complex subunit 1) This gene is a tumor suppressor gene that encodes the growth inhibitory protein hamartin. The encoded protein interacts with and stabilizes the GTPase activating protein tuberin. This hamartin-tuberin complex negatively regulates mammalian target of rapamycin complex 1 (mTORC1) signaling which is a major regulator of anabolic cell growth. This protein also functions as a co-chaperone for Hsp90 that inhibits its ATPase activity. This protein functions as a facilitator of Hsp90-mediated folding of kinase and non-kinase clients, including TSC2 and thereby preventing their ubiquitination and proteasomal degradation. Mutations in this gene have been associated with tuberous sclerosis and lymphangioleiomyomatosis. [provided by RefSeq, May 2022]

TSC1 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -16 ACMG points.

BP6

Variant 9-132910616-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr9-132910616-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 255945.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr9-132910616-G-A is described in Lovd as [Benign].

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population sas. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.0000722 (11/152286) while in subpopulation SAS AF= 0.00145 (7/4826). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00068. There are 0 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 9 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 31. This position pass quality control queck.

BS2

High AC in GnomAd4 at 11 AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	#exon/exons	MANE	Protein	UniProt
TSC1	NM_000368.5 linkuse as main transcript	c.1218C>T	p.Tyr406=	synonymous_variant	12/23	ENST00000298552.9	NP_000359.1

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	#exon/exons	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
TSC1	ENST00000298552.9 linkuse as main transcript	c.1218C>T	p.Tyr406=	synonymous_variant	12/23	1	NM_000368.5	ENSP00000298552	P4	Q92574-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.0000723

AC:

AN:

152168

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.0000724

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00145

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.0000147

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00

GnomAD3 exomes

AF:

0.000295

AC:

AN:

251100

Hom.:

AF XY:

0.000354

AC XY:

AN XY:

135704

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.0000289

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS exome

AF:

0.00176

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.000167

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.00

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.000142

AC:

208

AN:

1461822

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000173

AC XY:

126

AN XY:

727216

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 AMR exome

AF:

0.0000224

Gnomad4 ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS exome

AF:

0.00179

Gnomad4 FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE exome

AF:

0.0000360

Gnomad4 OTH exome

AF:

0.000215

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.0000722

AC:

AN:

152286

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000121

AC XY:

AN XY:

74468

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR

AF:

0.0000722

Gnomad4 AMR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS

AF:

0.00145

Gnomad4 FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE

AF:

0.0000147

Gnomad4 OTH

AF:

0.00

Alfa

AF:

0.0000775

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.0000529

Asia WGS

AF:

0.000577

AC:

AN:

3478

EpiCase

AF:

0.00

EpiControl

AF:

0.0000593

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign

Submissions summary: Benign:12

Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified

Benign:3

Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga)	Mar 09, 2018	- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences	-	- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	GeneDx	Jul 21, 2015	This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

Tuberous sclerosis 1

Benign:3

Benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Genome-Nilou Lab	Nov 07, 2021	- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina	Jan 13, 2018	This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp	Jan 31, 2024	- -

Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome

Benign:2

Benign, criteria provided, single submitter	curation	Sema4, Sema4	Feb 11, 2022	- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Ambry Genetics	Mar 08, 2017	This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Tuberous sclerosis syndrome

Benign:1

Benign, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

All of Us Research Program, National Institutes of Health

Dec 13, 2023

- -

Lymphangiomyomatosis;C1846385:Isolated focal cortical dysplasia type II;C1854465:Tuberous sclerosis 1

Benign:1

Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

Fulgent Genetics, Fulgent Genetics

Jul 19, 2021

- -

not provided

Benign:1

Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen

Jan 01, 2024

TSC1: BS1 -

Isolated focal cortical dysplasia type II

Benign:1

Benign, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Jan 13, 2018

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.77

CADD

Benign

4.0

DANN

Benign

0.41

RBP_binding_hub_radar

0.0

RBP_regulation_power_radar

1.1

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.39

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

DS_DL_spliceai

0.39

Position offset: -45

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over