rs373578965

Positions:

• chr2-232528558-C-T

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -10 ACMG points: 0P and 10B. BP4_Strong BP6 BP7 BS2

The NM_000751.3(CHRND):​c.411C>T​(p.Gly137=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000483 in 1,614,052 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 2 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

• Frequency:
  • Genomes: 𝑓 0.000072 (0 hom., cov: 32)
  • Exomes 𝑓: 0.000046 (2 hom.)
• Consequence: CHRND NM_000751.3 synonymous
• Clinical Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:2 B:2
• Conservation: PhyloP100: -0.0430

Genes affected

CHRND (HGNC:1965): (cholinergic receptor nicotinic delta subunit) The acetylcholine receptor of muscle has 5 subunits of 4 different types: 2 alpha and 1 each of beta, gamma and delta subunits. After acetylcholine binding, the receptor undergoes an extensive conformation change that affects all subunits and leads to opening of an ion-conducting channel across the plasma membrane. Defects in this gene are a cause of multiple pterygium syndrome lethal type (MUPSL), congenital myasthenic syndrome slow-channel type (SCCMS), and congenital myasthenic syndrome fast-channel type (FCCMS). Several transcript variants encoding different isoforms have been found for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2015]

ACMG classification

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -10 ACMG points.

• BP4: Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.74).
• BP6: Variant 2-232528558-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr2-232528558-C-T is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 334964.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=1, Uncertain_significance=2}.
• BP7: Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-0.043 with no splicing effect.
• BS2: High Homozygotes in GnomAdExome4 at 2 AD,AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	#exon/exons	MANE	Protein	UniProt
CHRND	NM_000751.3	c.411C>T	p.Gly137=	synonymous_variant	5/12	ENST00000258385.8	NP_000742.1
CHRND	NM_001311195.2	c.140C>T	p.Ala47Val	missense_variant	5/10		NP_001298124.1
CHRND	NM_001256657.2	c.366C>T	p.Gly122=	synonymous_variant	4/11		NP_001243586.1
CHRND	NM_001311196.2	c.108C>T	p.Gly36=	synonymous_variant	5/12		NP_001298125.1

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	#exon/exons	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
CHRND	ENST00000258385.8	c.411C>T	p.Gly137=	synonymous_variant	5/12	1	NM_000751.3	ENSP00000258385	P1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0000723 AC: 11 AN: 152172 Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32

Gnomad AFR AF: 0.0000724

Gnomad AMI AF: 0.00

Gnomad AMR AF: 0.000262

Gnomad ASJ AF: 0.00

Gnomad EAS AF: 0.000386

Gnomad SAS AF: 0.00

Gnomad FIN AF: 0.00

Gnomad MID AF: 0.00

Gnomad NFE AF: 0.00

Gnomad OTH AF: 0.000957

GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.0000477 AC: 12 AN: 251466 Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.0000294 AC XY: 4 AN XY: 135910

Gnomad AFR exome AF: 0.0000615

Gnomad AMR exome AF: 0.0000867

Gnomad ASJ exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad EAS exome AF: 0.000163

Gnomad SAS exome AF: 0.0000653

Gnomad FIN exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad NFE exome AF: 0.00000879

Gnomad OTH exome AF: 0.000326

GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0000458 AC: 67 AN: 1461880 Hom.: 2 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.0000344 AC XY: 25 AN XY: 727238

Gnomad4 AFR exome AF: 0.0000299

Gnomad4 AMR exome AF: 0.0000671

Gnomad4 ASJ exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 EAS exome AF: 0.000277

Gnomad4 SAS exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 FIN exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 NFE exome AF: 0.00000540

Gnomad4 OTH exome AF: 0.000762

GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0000723 AC: 11 AN: 152172 Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0000673 AC XY: 5 AN XY: 74334

Gnomad4 AFR AF: 0.0000724

Gnomad4 AMR AF: 0.000262

Gnomad4 ASJ AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 EAS AF: 0.000386

Gnomad4 SAS AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 FIN AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 NFE AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 OTH AF: 0.000957

Alfa AF: 0.000174 Hom.: 0

Bravo AF: 0.0000718

Asia WGS AF: 0.00260 AC: 9 AN: 3478

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity

Submissions summary: Uncertain:2 Benign:2

Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications

Submissions by phenotype

Lethal multiple pterygium syndrome Uncertain:1 Benign:1

Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina	Jan 13, 2018	This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp	Sep 08, 2023	- -

Congenital myasthenic syndrome Uncertain:1

Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Jan 13, 2018

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -

CHRND-related disorder Benign:1

Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided

clinical testing

PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences

Jun 15, 2023

This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name	Calibrated prediction	Score	Prediction
BayesDel_noAF	Benign	-0.74
CADD	Benign	3.5
DANN	Uncertain	0.99

Splicing

Name	Calibrated prediction	Score	Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)		0.0		Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs373578965; hg19: chr2-233393268;