rs373656667
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. The variant received -6 ACMG points: 0P and 6B. BP4_StrongBP6BP7
The NM_000260.4(MYO7A):c.2181T>C(p.Phe727Phe) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000252 in 1,613,202 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 1 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_000260.4 synonymous
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- nonsyndromic genetic hearing lossInheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: ClinGen
- autosomal recessive nonsyndromic hearing loss 2Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, MODERATE, LIMITED Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), PanelApp Australia, Ambry Genetics, G2P
- Usher syndrome type 1Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: ClinGen, Orphanet, PanelApp Australia
- Usher syndrome type 1BInheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), G2P
- autosomal dominant nonsyndromic hearing loss 11Inheritance: AD Classification: STRONG, MODERATE Submitted by: Ambry Genetics, PanelApp Australia, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
- autosomal dominant nonsyndromic hearing lossInheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
- hearing loss, autosomal recessiveInheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
- Usher syndrome type 2Inheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Likely_benign. The variant received -6 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MYO7A | ENST00000409709.9 | c.2181T>C | p.Phe727Phe | synonymous_variant | Exon 18 of 49 | 1 | NM_000260.4 | ENSP00000386331.3 | ||
MYO7A | ENST00000458637.6 | c.2181T>C | p.Phe727Phe | synonymous_variant | Exon 18 of 49 | 1 | ENSP00000392185.2 | |||
MYO7A | ENST00000409619.6 | c.2148T>C | p.Phe716Phe | synonymous_variant | Exon 19 of 50 | 1 | ENSP00000386635.2 | |||
MYO7A | ENST00000670577.1 | n.21T>C | non_coding_transcript_exon_variant | Exon 1 of 32 | ENSP00000499323.1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.000296 AC: 45AN: 152196Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.000362 AC: 90AN: 248900 AF XY: 0.000377 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000248 AC: 362AN: 1460888Hom.: 1 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.000275 AC XY: 200AN XY: 726744 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.000295 AC: 45AN: 152314Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.000269 AC XY: 20AN XY: 74480 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Benign:3
MYO7A: BP4, BP7 -
- -
- -
Autosomal recessive nonsyndromic hearing loss 2 Uncertain:1
This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -
Usher syndrome type 1 Uncertain:1
This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -
not specified Benign:1
p.Phe727Phe in Exon 18 of MYO7A: This variant is not expected to have clinical s ignificance because it does not alter an amino acid residue and is not located w ithin the splice consensus sequence. It has been identified in 36/66208 European chromosomes by the Exome Aggregation Consortium (ExAC, http://exac.broadinstitu te.org). -
Autosomal dominant nonsyndromic hearing loss 11 Benign:1
This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. -
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at