Menu
GeneBe

rs373817937

Variant summary

Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -5 ACMG points: 0P and 5B. BP4_StrongBP6

The NM_005732.4(RAD50):c.2530A>C(p.Ser844Arg) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00000747 in 1,607,022 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 12/19 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Another nucleotide change resulting in same amino acid change has been previously reported as Uncertain significancein ClinVar. Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. S844G) has been classified as Uncertain significance.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.000020 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0000062 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

RAD50
NM_005732.4 missense

Scores

1
2
9

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:5B:2

Conservation

PhyloP100: 2.53
Variant links:
Genes affected
RAD50 (HGNC:9816): (RAD50 double strand break repair protein) The protein encoded by this gene is highly similar to Saccharomyces cerevisiae Rad50, a protein involved in DNA double-strand break repair. This protein forms a complex with MRE11 and NBS1. The protein complex binds to DNA and displays numerous enzymatic activities that are required for nonhomologous joining of DNA ends. This protein, cooperating with its partners, is important for DNA double-strand break repair, cell cycle checkpoint activation, telomere maintenance, and meiotic recombination. Knockout studies of the mouse homolog suggest this gene is essential for cell growth and viability. Mutations in this gene are the cause of Nijmegen breakage syndrome-like disorder.[provided by RefSeq, Apr 2010]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -5 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.048837274).
BP6
Variant 5-132604811-A-C is Benign according to our data. Variant chr5-132604811-A-C is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 142780.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Uncertain_significance=5, Likely_benign=1, Benign=1}.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE UniProt
RAD50NM_005732.4 linkuse as main transcriptc.2530A>C p.Ser844Arg missense_variant 16/25 ENST00000378823.8

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Appris UniProt
RAD50ENST00000378823.8 linkuse as main transcriptc.2530A>C p.Ser844Arg missense_variant 16/251 NM_005732.4 P1Q92878-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.0000197
AC:
3
AN:
152210
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.000576
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.00
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.0000361
AC:
9
AN:
249194
Hom.:
0
AF XY:
0.0000297
AC XY:
4
AN XY:
134708
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.000492
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.00000619
AC:
9
AN:
1454694
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
30
AF XY:
0.00000138
AC XY:
1
AN XY:
724012
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.000227
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.00
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.0000197
AC:
3
AN:
152328
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.0000268
AC XY:
2
AN XY:
74490
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.000578
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00
Bravo
AF:
0.00000756
ExAC
AF:
0.0000330
AC:
4
Asia WGS
AF:
0.000577
AC:
2
AN:
3478

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:5Benign:2
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Uncertain:2
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAmbry GeneticsFeb 23, 2022The p.S844R variant (also known as c.2530A>C), located in coding exon 16 of the RAD50 gene, results from an A to C substitution at nucleotide position 2530. The serine at codon 844 is replaced by arginine, an amino acid with dissimilar properties. This amino acid position is well conserved in available vertebrate species. In addition, the in silico prediction for this alteration is inconclusive. Since supporting evidence is limited at this time, the clinical significance of this alteration remains unclear. -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingInvitaeDec 16, 2023This sequence change replaces serine, which is neutral and polar, with arginine, which is basic and polar, at codon 844 of the RAD50 protein (p.Ser844Arg). This variant is present in population databases (rs373817937, gnomAD 0.05%). This variant has not been reported in the literature in individuals affected with RAD50-related conditions. ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 142780). Advanced modeling of protein sequence and biophysical properties (such as structural, functional, and spatial information, amino acid conservation, physicochemical variation, residue mobility, and thermodynamic stability) performed at Invitae indicates that this missense variant is not expected to disrupt RAD50 protein function with a negative predictive value of 80%. In summary, the available evidence is currently insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease. Therefore, it has been classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. -
Nijmegen breakage syndrome-like disorder Uncertain:2
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingBaylor GeneticsJul 23, 2023- -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingFulgent Genetics, Fulgent GeneticsOct 31, 2018- -
not provided Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingQuest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan CapistranoDec 27, 2022The variant has not been reported in the published literature. The frequency of this variant in the general population, 0.0005 (10/19868 chromosomes, http://gnomad.broadinstitute.org), is uninformative in assessment of its pathogenicity. Analysis of this variant using bioinformatics tools for the prediction of the effect of amino acid changes on protein structure and function yielded predictions that this variant is benign. Based on the available information, we are unable to determine the clinical significance of this variant. -
not specified Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingWomen's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorpOct 02, 2023Variant summary: RAD50 c.2530A>C (p.Ser844Arg) results in a non-conservative amino acid change in the encoded protein sequence. Three of five in-silico tools predict a benign effect of the variant on protein function. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 3.6e-05 in 280604 control chromosomes, predominantly at a frequency of 0.0005 within the East Asian subpopulation in the gnomAD database. The observed variant frequency within East Asian control individuals in the gnomAD database is approximately 8-fold of the estimated maximal expected allele frequency for a pathogenic variant in RAD50 causing Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer Syndrome phenotype (6.3e-05). In addition, the variant is reported with similar allele frequencies in certain East Asian subpopulations, e.g. in the Chinese (0.00057in ChinaMAP), suggesting that the variant might be benign. c.2530A>C has been reported in the literature in individuals affected with breast cancer and other tumor phenotypes (e.g. Toh_2018, Yap_2018, Dorling_2021), but was also found in controls (Dorling_2021). These reports do not provide unequivocal conclusions about association of the variant with Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer Syndrome. To our knowledge, no experimental evidence demonstrating an impact on protein function has been reported. The following publications have been ascertained in the context of this evaluation (PMID: 31360874, 29926297, 33471991). Four submitters have cited clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar after 2014. Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as likely benign. -
Ovarian cancer Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLaboratory of Molecular Epidemiology of Birth Defects, West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan UniversityJan 01, 2022- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Pathogenic
0.76
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.19
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.16
Cadd
Benign
20
Dann
Benign
0.74
Eigen
Benign
-0.18
Eigen_PC
Benign
-0.024
FATHMM_MKL
Uncertain
0.96
D
M_CAP
Benign
0.0060
T
MetaRNN
Benign
0.049
T;T;T;T
MetaSVM
Benign
-1.1
T
MutationTaster
Benign
1.0
D;D
PrimateAI
Uncertain
0.62
T
Polyphen
0.021
.;.;.;B
Vest4
0.47
MutPred
0.32
.;.;.;Gain of MoRF binding (P = 0.0136);
MVP
0.46
ClinPred
0.11
T
GERP RS
4.9
RBP_binding_hub_radar
0.0
RBP_regulation_power_radar
1.7
Varity_R
0.26
gMVP
0.25

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs373817937; hg19: chr5-131940503; API