rs373911322

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -15 ACMG points: 1P and 16B. PP3BP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2

The NM_001286105.2(CLN3):​c.20G>A​(p.Arg7His) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000468 in 1,614,102 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 8 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a pathogenic outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00026 ( 1 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00049 ( 7 hom. )

Consequence

CLN3
NM_001286105.2 missense

Scores

1
1

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:9

Conservation

PhyloP100: -2.12
Variant links:
Genes affected
CLN3 (HGNC:2074): (CLN3 lysosomal/endosomal transmembrane protein, battenin) This gene encodes a protein that is involved in lysosomal function. Mutations in this, as well as other neuronal ceroid-lipofuscinosis (CLN) genes, cause neurodegenerative diseases commonly known as Batten disease or collectively known as neuronal ceroid lipofuscinoses (NCLs). Many alternatively spliced transcript variants have been found for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -15 ACMG points.

PP3
BayesDel_noAF computational evidence supports a deleterious effect, 0.14
BP6
Variant 16-28488645-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr16-28488645-C-T is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 197712.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr16-28488645-C-T is described in Lovd as [Benign]. Variant chr16-28488645-C-T is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population sas. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.000256 (39/152250) while in subpopulation SAS AF= 0.00725 (35/4830). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00536. There are 1 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 30 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAdExome4 at 7 AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
CLN3NM_001042432.2 linkc.240G>A p.Thr80Thr synonymous_variant Exon 5 of 16 ENST00000636147.2 NP_001035897.1 Q13286-1A0A024QZB8

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
CLN3ENST00000636147.2 linkc.240G>A p.Thr80Thr synonymous_variant Exon 5 of 16 1 NM_001042432.2 ENSP00000490105.1 Q13286-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.000270
AC:
41
AN:
152132
Hom.:
1
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.0000483
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.000193
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00765
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.0000147
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.000962
AC:
242
AN:
251490
Hom.:
3
AF XY:
0.00127
AC XY:
172
AN XY:
135918
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.0000578
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.0000544
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.00761
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.000978
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.000490
AC:
716
AN:
1461852
Hom.:
7
Cov.:
30
AF XY:
0.000650
AC XY:
473
AN XY:
727232
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.0000224
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.000277
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.00772
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.00000450
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.000546
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.000256
AC:
39
AN:
152250
Hom.:
1
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.000403
AC XY:
30
AN XY:
74454
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.0000481
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.000193
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00725
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.0000147
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00
Bravo
AF:
0.0000793
Asia WGS
AF:
0.00693
AC:
24
AN:
3478

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:9
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided Benign:3
-
Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Mar 05, 2020
GeneDx
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

-
Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

not specified Benign:2
May 13, 2015
Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga)
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

-
Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center
Significance: Benign
Review Status: no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Inborn genetic diseases Benign:1
Mar 01, 2019
Ambry Genetics
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Neuronal ceroid lipofuscinosis Benign:1
Jan 14, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Neuronal ceroid lipofuscinosis 3 Benign:1
Apr 27, 2017
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases allowed determination this variant is unlikely to cause disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as likely benign. -

CLN3-related disorder Benign:1
Jul 02, 2019
PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
Significance: Benign
Review Status: no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant is classified as benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Pathogenic
0.14
CADD
Benign
0.43
DANN
Benign
0.96

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.15
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs373911322; hg19: chr16-28499966; API