rs373960465

Variant names:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Likely benign. The variant received -4 ACMG points: 0P and 4B. BP4_Strong

The NM_001378615.1(CC2D2A):c.3046G>A(p.Glu1016Lys) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000105 in 1,606,286 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 1 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00058 ( 0 hom., cov: 33)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.000056 ( 1 hom. )

Consequence

CC2D2A
NM_001378615.1 missense

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:7B:2

Conservation

PhyloP100: 9.92

Publications

0 publications found

Variant links:

Genes affected

CC2D2A (HGNC:29253): (coiled-coil and C2 domain containing 2A) This gene encodes a coiled-coil and calcium binding domain protein that appears to play a critical role in cilia formation. Mutations in this gene cause Meckel syndrome type 6, as well as Joubert syndrome type 9. Alternative splicing results in multiple transcript variants. [provided by RefSeq, Sep 2009]

CC2D2A Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):

ciliopathy
Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: ClinGen
Joubert syndrome 9
Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Genomics England PanelApp, G2P
retinitis pigmentosa 93
Inheritance: AR Classification: STRONG Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
COACH syndrome 1
Inheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
Joubert syndrome with oculorenal defect
Inheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
Meckel syndrome
Inheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet

CC2D2A links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Likely_benign. The variant received -4 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.06247434).

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
CC2D2A	NM_001378615.1 link	c.3046G>A	p.Glu1016Lys	missense_variant	Exon 24 of 37	ENST00000424120.6	NP_001365544.1

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
CC2D2A	ENST00000424120.6 link	c.3046G>A	p.Glu1016Lys	missense_variant	Exon 24 of 37	5	NM_001378615.1	ENSP00000403465.1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.000578

AC:

AN:

152170

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.00195

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.000327

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.00

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.000958

GnomAD2 exomes

AF:

0.000174

AC:

AN:

235238

AF XY:

0.000134

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.00217

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.000243

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.000345

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.0000557

AC:

AN:

1454000

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.0000485

AC XY:

AN XY:

722390

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.00141

AC:

AN:

33370

American (AMR)

AF:

0.000276

AC:

AN:

43434

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

26002

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

39434

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

84774

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

52870

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

5762

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.00000541

AC:

AN:

1108182

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.000266

AC:

AN:

60172

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.478

Heterozygous variant carriers

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het

Exome Hom

Variant carriers

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.000578

AC:

AN:

152286

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000618

AC XY:

AN XY:

74458

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.00195

AC:

AN:

41560

American (AMR)

AF:

0.000327

AC:

AN:

15302

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

3468

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

5170

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

4824

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

10610

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

294

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

68036

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.000948

AC:

AN:

2110

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.505

Heterozygous variant carriers

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het

Variant carriers

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

Alfa

AF:

0.000510

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.000635

ESP6500AA

AF:

0.000262

AC:

ESP6500EA

AF:

0.00

AC:

ExAC

AF:

0.000224

AC:

Asia WGS

AF:

0.000289

AC:

AN:

3478

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity

Submissions summary: Uncertain:7Benign:2

Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided

Uncertain:3

Dec 01, 2023

CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen

Significance:Uncertain significance

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

Feb 22, 2018

Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga)

Significance:Uncertain significance

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

Aug 13, 2021

GeneDx

Significance:Uncertain significance

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

In silico analysis supports that this missense variant has a deleterious effect on protein structure/function; Has not been previously published as pathogenic or benign to our knowledge

Joubert syndrome 9

Uncertain:2

Aug 08, 2022

Baylor Genetics

Significance:Uncertain significance

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

Jan 13, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance:Uncertain significance

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease.

Joubert syndrome 9;C2676790:Meckel syndrome, type 6;C5436837:COACH syndrome 2

Uncertain:1

May 14, 2021

New York Genome Center

Significance:Uncertain significance

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

Meckel syndrome, type 6

Uncertain:1

Jan 13, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance:Uncertain significance

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

Meckel-Gruber syndrome;C0431399:Joubert syndrome

Benign:1

Jan 30, 2025

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

CC2D2A-related disorder

Benign:1

Oct 17, 2022

PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications).

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

AlphaMissense

Benign

0.32

BayesDel_addAF

Benign

-0.015

BayesDel_noAF

Pathogenic

0.20

CADD

Pathogenic

(source)

DANN

Pathogenic

1.0

DEOGEN2

Uncertain

0.54

D;D

Eigen

Uncertain

0.63

Eigen_PC

Pathogenic

0.68

FATHMM_MKL

Pathogenic

0.99

LIST_S2

Uncertain

0.96

D;.

M_CAP

Benign

0.059

MetaRNN

Benign

0.062

T;T

MetaSVM

Uncertain

-0.24

MutationAssessor

Uncertain

2.1

M;M

PhyloP100

9.9

PrimateAI

Pathogenic

0.82

PROVEAN

Uncertain

-2.5

D;D

REVEL

Uncertain

0.47

Sift

Benign

0.068

T;T

Sift4G

Benign

0.21

T;T

Vest4

0.90

ClinPred

0.081

GERP RS

5.3

Varity_R

0.50

gMVP

0.79

Mutation Taster

=40/60

disease causing

(source)

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

You must be logged in to view publications. This limit was set because tens of millions (!) of queries from AI bots are generated daily.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

Publications

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

Age Distribution

Age Distribution

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

Other links and lift over