rs374154973

Positions:

chr8-31142651-A-G

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -9 ACMG points: 0P and 9B. BP4_StrongBP6BS2

The NM_000553.6(WRN):c.3259A>G(p.Lys1087Glu) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000541 in 1,603,318 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 2 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 15/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00026 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.00057 ( 2 hom. )

Consequence

WRN
NM_000553.6 missense

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:4B:1

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.158

Variant links:

Genes affected

WRN (HGNC:12791): (WRN RecQ like helicase) This gene encodes a member of the RecQ subfamily of DNA helicase proteins. The encoded nuclear protein is important in the maintenance of genome stability and plays a role in DNA repair, replication, transcription and telomere maintenance. This protein contains a N-terminal 3' to 5' exonuclease domain, an ATP-dependent helicase domain and RQC (RecQ helicase conserved region) domain in its central region, and a C-terminal HRDC (helicase RNase D C-terminal) domain and nuclear localization signal. Defects in this gene are the cause of Werner syndrome, an autosomal recessive disorder characterized by accelerated aging and an elevated risk for certain cancers. [provided by RefSeq, Aug 2017]

WRN links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -9 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.035849333).

BP6

Variant 8-31142651-A-G is Benign according to our data. Variant chr8-31142651-A-G is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 238150.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=1, Uncertain_significance=2}.

BS2

High Homozygotes in GnomAdExome4 at 2 AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	#exon/exons	MANE	Protein	UniProt
WRN	NM_000553.6 linkuse as main transcript	c.3259A>G	p.Lys1087Glu	missense_variant	27/35	ENST00000298139.7	NP_000544.2

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	#exon/exons	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris
WRN	ENST00000298139.7 linkuse as main transcript	c.3259A>G	p.Lys1087Glu	missense_variant	27/35	1	NM_000553.6	ENSP00000298139	P1
WRN	ENST00000521620.5 linkuse as main transcript	n.1892A>G		non_coding_transcript_exon_variant	15/23	1
WRN	ENST00000650667.1 linkuse as main transcript	c.*2873A>G		3_prime_UTR_variant, NMD_transcript_variant	26/34			ENSP00000498593

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.000263

AC:

AN:

152228

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.0000724

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.000544

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00

GnomAD3 exomes

AF:

0.000193

AC:

AN:

248126

Hom.:

AF XY:

0.000194

AC XY:

AN XY:

134078

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.000249

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.0000589

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS exome

AF:

0.0000338

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.000364

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.00

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.000571

AC:

828

AN:

1451090

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000517

AC XY:

373

AN XY:

721036

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR exome

AF:

0.0000300

Gnomad4 AMR exome

AF:

0.0000679

Gnomad4 ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS exome

AF:

0.0000121

Gnomad4 FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE exome

AF:

0.000723

Gnomad4 OTH exome

AF:

0.000367

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.000263

AC:

AN:

152228

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000121

AC XY:

AN XY:

74382

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR

AF:

0.0000724

Gnomad4 AMR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE

AF:

0.000544

Gnomad4 OTH

AF:

0.00

Alfa

AF:

0.000445

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.000257

ESP6500AA

AF:

0.00

AC:

ESP6500EA

AF:

0.000350

AC:

ExAC

AF:

0.000140

AC:

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity

Submissions summary: Uncertain:4Benign:1

Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided

Uncertain:2

Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	GeneDx	May 17, 2021	In silico analysis supports that this missense variant does not alter protein structure/function; Has not been previously published as pathogenic or benign to our knowledge -
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria provided	clinical testing	Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System	-	The WRN p.Lys1087Glu variant was not identified in the literature nor was it identified in Cosmic or LOVD 3.0. The variant was identified in dbSNP (ID: rs374154973) and ClinVar (classified as uncertain significance by Invitae and Fulgent Genetics for Werner syndrome). The variant was identified in control databases in 54 of 279522 chromosomes (1 homozygous) at a frequency of 0.0001932 (Genome Aggregation Database March 6, 2019, v2.1.1). The variant was observed in the following populations: European (non-Finnish) in 47 of 128198 chromosomes (freq: 0.000367), African in 4 of 24796 chromosomes (freq: 0.000161), Latino in 2 of 34780 chromosomes (freq: 0.000058) and South Asian in 1 of 29552 chromosomes (freq: 0.000034), but was not observed in the Ashkenazi Jewish, East Asian, European (Finnish), or Other populations. The p.Lys1087 residue is not conserved in mammals and computational analyses (PolyPhen-2, SIFT, AlignGVGD, BLOSUM, MutationTaster) do not suggest a high likelihood of impact to the protein; however, this information is not predictive enough to rule out pathogenicity. The variant occurs outside of the splicing consensus sequence and in silico or computational prediction software programs (SpliceSiteFinder, MaxEntScan, NNSPLICE, GeneSplicer) do not predict a difference in splicing. In summary, based on the above information the clinical significance of this variant cannot be determined with certainty at this time. This variant is classified as a variant of uncertain significance. -

Werner syndrome

Uncertain:1Benign:1

Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp	Jan 29, 2024	- -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Fulgent Genetics, Fulgent Genetics	Oct 31, 2018	- -

WRN-related disorder

Uncertain:1

Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria provided

clinical testing

PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences

Oct 18, 2023

The WRN c.3259A>G variant is predicted to result in the amino acid substitution p.Lys1087Glu. To our knowledge, this variant has not been reported in the literature. This variant is reported in 0.037% of alleles in individuals of European (Non-Finnish) descent in gnomAD, including one homozygous individual (http://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/variant/8-31000167-A-G) and has conflicting interpretations in ClinVar, ranging from uncertain significance to likely benign (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/clinvar/variation/238150/). At this time, the clinical significance of this variant is uncertain due to the absence of conclusive functional and genetic evidence. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

AlphaMissense

Benign

0.056

BayesDel_addAF

Benign

-0.59

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.77

CADD

Benign

1.2

DANN

Benign

0.21

DEOGEN2

Benign

0.044

Eigen

Benign

-1.5

Eigen_PC

Benign

-1.5

FATHMM_MKL

Benign

0.00073

LIST_S2

Benign

0.54

M_CAP

Benign

0.0025

MetaRNN

Benign

0.036

MetaSVM

Benign

-1.0

MutationAssessor

Benign

-0.77

MutationTaster

Benign

1.0

PrimateAI

Benign

0.24

PROVEAN

Benign

0.030

REVEL

Benign

0.012

Sift

Benign

1.0

Sift4G

Benign

1.0

Polyphen

0.0

Vest4

0.034

MVP

0.17

MPC

0.088

ClinPred

0.0029

GERP RS

-0.57

RBP_binding_hub_radar

0.0

RBP_regulation_power_radar

1.1

Varity_R

0.037

gMVP

0.29

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.060

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over