rs3742037

Variant names:

• chr12-109788574-G-A
• rs3742037
• NM_021625.5:c.2034C>T

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -19 ACMG points: 0P and 19B. BP4_Moderate BP6_Very_Strong BP7 BA1

The NM_021625.5(TRPV4):​c.2034C>T​(p.Ile678Ile) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.154 in 1,614,170 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 20,663 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).

• Frequency:
  • Genomes: 𝑓 0.15 (1829 hom., cov: 33)
  • Exomes 𝑓: 0.15 (18834 hom.)
• Consequence: TRPV4 NM_021625.5 synonymous
• Clinical Significance: Benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:15
• Conservation: PhyloP100: -0.149

Genes affected

TRPV4 (HGNC:18083): (transient receptor potential cation channel subfamily V member 4) This gene encodes a member of the OSM9-like transient receptor potential channel (OTRPC) subfamily in the transient receptor potential (TRP) superfamily of ion channels. The encoded protein is a Ca2+-permeable, nonselective cation channel that is thought to be involved in the regulation of systemic osmotic pressure. Mutations in this gene are the cause of spondylometaphyseal and metatropic dysplasia and hereditary motor and sensory neuropathy type IIC. Multiple transcript variants encoding different isoforms have been found for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Apr 2010]

ACMG classification

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -19 ACMG points.

• BP4: Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.42).
• BP6: Variant 12-109788574-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr12-109788574-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 137725.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr12-109788574-G-A is described in Lovd as [Benign].
• BP7: Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-0.149 with no splicing effect.
• BA1: GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (SAS) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.212 is higher than 0.05.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
TRPV4	NM_021625.5	c.2034C>T	p.Ile678Ile	synonymous_variant	Exon 13 of 16	ENST00000261740.7	NP_067638.3

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
TRPV4	ENST00000261740.7	c.2034C>T	p.Ile678Ile	synonymous_variant	Exon 13 of 16	1	NM_021625.5	ENSP00000261740.2

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.148 AC: 22490 AN: 152168 Hom.: 1826 Cov.: 33

Gnomad AFR AF: 0.116

Gnomad AMI AF: 0.107

Gnomad AMR AF: 0.210

Gnomad ASJ AF: 0.0654

Gnomad EAS AF: 0.188

Gnomad SAS AF: 0.223

Gnomad FIN AF: 0.168

Gnomad MID AF: 0.142

Gnomad NFE AF: 0.146

Gnomad OTH AF: 0.152

GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.172 AC: 43232 AN: 251470 Hom.: 4316 AF XY: 0.170 AC XY: 23064 AN XY: 135912

Gnomad AFR exome AF: 0.119

Gnomad AMR exome AF: 0.284

Gnomad ASJ exome AF: 0.0676

Gnomad EAS exome AF: 0.193

Gnomad SAS exome AF: 0.229

Gnomad FIN exome AF: 0.171

Gnomad NFE exome AF: 0.137

Gnomad OTH exome AF: 0.147

GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.154 AC: 225820 AN: 1461884 Hom.: 18834 Cov.: 34 AF XY: 0.156 AC XY: 113317 AN XY: 727246

Gnomad4 AFR exome AF: 0.116

Gnomad4 AMR exome AF: 0.279

Gnomad4 ASJ exome AF: 0.0686

Gnomad4 EAS exome AF: 0.190

Gnomad4 SAS exome AF: 0.229

Gnomad4 FIN exome AF: 0.171

Gnomad4 NFE exome AF: 0.145

Gnomad4 OTH exome AF: 0.155

GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.148 AC: 22501 AN: 152286 Hom.: 1829 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.151 AC XY: 11250 AN XY: 74472

Gnomad4 AFR AF: 0.116

Gnomad4 AMR AF: 0.211

Gnomad4 ASJ AF: 0.0654

Gnomad4 EAS AF: 0.188

Gnomad4 SAS AF: 0.223

Gnomad4 FIN AF: 0.168

Gnomad4 NFE AF: 0.146

Gnomad4 OTH AF: 0.151

Alfa AF: 0.141 Hom.: 3665

Bravo AF: 0.150

Asia WGS AF: 0.211 AC: 734 AN: 3478

ClinVar

Significance: Benign

Submissions summary: Benign:15

Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:6

Jul 17, 2017

Athena Diagnostics

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Mar 06, 2014

GeneDx

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

-

PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

-

Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht

Significance: Benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

-

Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+

Significance: Benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

-

Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center

Significance: Benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease axonal type 2C Benign:2

Feb 04, 2025

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Jan 12, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease Benign:1

-

Molecular Genetics Laboratory, London Health Sciences Centre

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Neuronopathy, distal hereditary motor, autosomal dominant 8 Benign:1

Jan 12, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Scapuloperoneal spinal muscular atrophy Benign:1

Jan 12, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

not provided Benign:1

-

Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: not provided

- -

Brachyrachia (short spine dysplasia) Benign:1

Jan 12, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Spondylometaphyseal dysplasia, Kozlowski type Benign:1

Jan 12, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Metatropic dysplasia Benign:1

Jan 12, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name	Calibrated prediction	Score	Prediction
BayesDel_noAF	Benign	-0.42
CADD	Benign	8.1
DANN	Benign	0.81

Splicing

Name	Calibrated prediction	Score	Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)		0.0		Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs3742037; hg19: chr12-110226379; COSMIC: COSV55681905;