rs374205826
Variant summary
Our verdict is Uncertain significance. Variant got 2 ACMG points: 2P and 0B. PM2
The NM_001384140.1(PCDH15):c.2717C>T(p.Pro906Leu) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000824 in 1,613,538 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_001384140.1 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Uncertain_significance. Variant got 2 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PCDH15 | ENST00000320301.11 | c.2717C>T | p.Pro906Leu | missense_variant | Exon 20 of 33 | 1 | NM_033056.4 | ENSP00000322604.6 | ||
PCDH15 | ENST00000644397.2 | c.2717C>T | p.Pro906Leu | missense_variant | Exon 20 of 38 | NM_001384140.1 | ENSP00000495195.1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0000329 AC: 5AN: 151968Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.0000518 AC: 13AN: 250908Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.0000590 AC XY: 8AN XY: 135596
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0000876 AC: 128AN: 1461570Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0000825 AC XY: 60AN XY: 727076
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0000329 AC: 5AN: 151968Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0000270 AC XY: 2AN XY: 74210
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Usher syndrome type 1F Uncertain:2
- -
- -
not provided Uncertain:2
This sequence change replaces proline, which is neutral and non-polar, with leucine, which is neutral and non-polar, at codon 906 of the PCDH15 protein (p.Pro906Leu). This variant is present in population databases (rs374205826, gnomAD 0.01%). This variant has not been reported in the literature in individuals affected with PCDH15-related conditions. ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 46455). Advanced modeling of protein sequence and biophysical properties (such as structural, functional, and spatial information, amino acid conservation, physicochemical variation, residue mobility, and thermodynamic stability) performed at Invitae indicates that this missense variant is not expected to disrupt PCDH15 protein function with a negative predictive value of 80%. In summary, the available evidence is currently insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease. Therefore, it has been classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. -
In silico analysis supports that this missense variant has a deleterious effect on protein structure/function; Has not been previously published as pathogenic or benign to our knowledge; This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 15537665) -
not specified Uncertain:1
Variant classified as Uncertain Significance - Favor Benign. The p.Pro906Leu var iant in PCDH15 has been identified by our laboratory in 2 individuals with heari ng loss. However, neither of them had a second variant in PCDH15, and one indivi dual carried pathogenic variants in a different gene that explained their hearin g loss. This variant has also been identified in 11/111752 European chromosomes by the Genome Aggregation Database (gnomAD, http://gnomad.broadinstitute.org; db SNP rs374205826), though this frequency is not high enough to rule out a pathoge nic role. Computational prediction tools and conservation analyses do not provid e strong support for or against an impact to the protein. In summary, while the clinical significance of the p.Pro906Leu variant is uncertain, these data sugges t that it is more likely to be benign. -
Inborn genetic diseases Uncertain:1
The c.2717C>T (p.P906L) alteration is located in exon 20 (coding exon 19) of the PCDH15 gene. This alteration results from a C to T substitution at nucleotide position 2717, causing the proline (P) at amino acid position 906 to be replaced by a leucine (L). Based on insufficient or conflicting evidence, the clinical significance of this alteration remains unclear. -
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at