rs374288437

Variant names:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -9 ACMG points: 0P and 9B. BP4_StrongBP6BS2

The NM_004933.3(CDH15):c.1211C>T(p.Thr404Ile) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000976 in 1,597,930 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 15/22 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.000053 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.00010 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

CDH15
NM_004933.3 missense

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:1B:2

Conservation

PhyloP100: -0.0370

Publications

0 publications found

Variant links:

Genes affected

CDH15 (HGNC:1754): (cadherin 15) This gene is a member of the cadherin superfamily of genes, encoding calcium-dependent intercellular adhesion glycoproteins. Cadherins consist of an extracellular domain containing 5 cadherin domains, a transmembrane region, and a conserved cytoplasmic domain. Transcripts from this particular cadherin are expressed in myoblasts and upregulated in myotubule-forming cells. The protein is thought to be essential for the control of morphogenetic processes, specifically myogenesis, and may provide a trigger for terminal muscle cell differentiation. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]

CDH15 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):

autosomal dominant non-syndromic intellectual disability
Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
intellectual disability, autosomal dominant 3
Inheritance: AD Classification: LIMITED Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), G2P, Ambry Genetics
intellectual disability
Inheritance: AD Classification: NO_KNOWN Submitted by: ClinGen

CDH15 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -9 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.01977542).

BP6

Variant 16-89190475-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr16-89190475-C-T is described in ClinVar as Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity. ClinVar VariationId is 434628.

BS2

High AC in GnomAd4 at 8 AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
CDH15	NM_004933.3 link	c.1211C>T	p.Thr404Ile	missense_variant	Exon 8 of 14	ENST00000289746.3	NP_004924.1	P55291

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
CDH15	ENST00000289746.3 link	c.1211C>T	p.Thr404Ile	missense_variant	Exon 8 of 14	1	NM_004933.3	ENSP00000289746.2		P55291

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.0000526

AC:

AN:

152226

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00103

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.0000441

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00

GnomAD2 exomes

AF:

0.000207

AC:

AN:

217120

AF XY:

0.000255

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.0000312

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.000186

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.000102

AC:

148

AN:

1445586

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000156

AC XY:

112

AN XY:

717528

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

33366

American (AMR)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

41616

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

25642

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

39180

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.00142

AC:

119

AN:

83664

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

51120

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.000523

AC:

AN:

5736

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.0000172

AC:

AN:

1105408

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.000117

AC:

AN:

59854

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.475

Heterozygous variant carriers

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het

Variant carriers

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.0000525

AC:

AN:

152344

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.0000537

AC XY:

AN XY:

74502

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

41572

American (AMR)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

15310

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

3472

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

5182

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.00104

AC:

AN:

4828

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

10630

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

294

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.0000441

AC:

AN:

68030

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

2114

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.538

Heterozygous variant carriers

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het

Variant carriers

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

Alfa

AF:

0.0000868

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.0000227

ExAC

AF:

0.000182

AC:

Asia WGS

AF:

0.000577

AC:

AN:

3478

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity

Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:2

Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Intellectual disability

Uncertain:1

Jan 21, 2023

Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System

Significance:Uncertain significance

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:research

- -

not specified

Benign:1

Dec 30, 2016

Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

CDH15-related disorder

Benign:1

Jul 12, 2019

PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

AlphaMissense

Benign

0.13

BayesDel_addAF

Benign

-0.50

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.53

CADD

Benign

(source)

DANN

Uncertain

0.98

DEOGEN2

Benign

0.33

Eigen

Benign

-0.66

Eigen_PC

Benign

-0.73

FATHMM_MKL

Benign

0.11

LIST_S2

Benign

0.65

M_CAP

Benign

0.023

MetaRNN

Benign

0.020

MetaSVM

Benign

-0.97

MutationAssessor

Benign

1.8

PhyloP100

-0.037

PrimateAI

Uncertain

0.61

PROVEAN

Benign

-2.3

REVEL

Benign

0.029

Sift

Benign

0.032

Sift4G

Benign

0.095

Polyphen

0.41

Vest4

0.30

MVP

0.67

MPC

0.092

ClinPred

0.025

GERP RS

1.7

Varity_R

0.11

gMVP

0.65

Mutation Taster

=93/7

polymorphism

(source)

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.010

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

You must be logged in to view publications. This limit was set because tens of millions (!) of queries from AI bots are generated daily.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

Publications

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

Age Distribution

Age Distribution

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

Other links and lift over