rs374597395
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -3 ACMG points: 0P and 3B. BP4_ModerateBP6
The NM_000179.3(MSH6):āc.148T>Cā(p.Trp50Arg) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00000417 in 1,439,662 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 10/13 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_000179.3 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -3 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MSH6 | NM_000179.3 | c.148T>C | p.Trp50Arg | missense_variant | 1/10 | ENST00000234420.11 | NP_000170.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MSH6 | ENST00000234420.11 | c.148T>C | p.Trp50Arg | missense_variant | 1/10 | 1 | NM_000179.3 | ENSP00000234420 | P4 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00000991 AC: 2AN: 201732Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.0000179 AC XY: 2AN XY: 111908
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00000417 AC: 6AN: 1439662Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00000560 AC XY: 4AN XY: 714692
GnomAD4 genome Cov.: 32
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Lynch syndrome Uncertain:1Benign:1
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System | - | The MSH6 p.Trp50Arg variant was not identified in the literature nor was it identified in the GeneInsight-COGR, Cosmic, MutDB, Zhejiang University Database, Mismatch Repair Genes Variant Database, MMR Gene Unclassified Variants Database, or Insight Hereditary Tumors databases. The variant was identified in dbSNP (ID: rs374597395) as "With Likely benign allele", ClinVar (classified as likely benign by Ambry Genetics and Invitae), and in UMD-LSDB (1x) databases. The variant was identified in control databases in 2 of 199148 chromosomes at a frequency of 0.00001 (Genome Aggregation Database Feb 27, 2017). The variant identified in European population in 2 of 84074 chromosomes (freq: 0.00002), while the variant was not observed in the African, Other, Latino, Ashkenazi Jewish, East Asian, Finnish, and South Asian populations. The p.Trp50 residue is not conserved in mammals and four out of five computational analyses (PolyPhen-2, SIFT, AlignGVGD, BLOSUM, MutationTaster) do not suggest a high likelihood of impact to the protein; however, this information is not predictive enough to rule out pathogenicity. The variant occurs outside of the splicing consensus sequence and in silico or computational prediction software programs (SpliceSiteFinder, MaxEntScan, NNSPLICE, GeneSplicer, HumanSpliceFinder) do not predict a difference in splicing. In summary, based on the above information the clinical significance of this variant cannot be determined with certainty at this time. This variant is classified as a variant of uncertain significance. - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | All of Us Research Program, National Institutes of Health | Sep 17, 2023 | - - |
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:2
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Mar 29, 2019 | This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health | Jan 25, 2018 | - - |
not specified Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp | Jul 11, 2022 | Variant summary: MSH6 c.148T>C (p.Trp50Arg) results in a non-conservative amino acid change in the encoded protein sequence. Four of five in-silico tools predict a benign effect of the variant on protein function. A bioinformatics analysis supports that this missense variant does not alter protein structure (example: Terui_2013). The variant allele was found at a frequency of 9.9e-06 in 201732 control chromosomes (gnomAD). The available data on variant occurrences in the general population are insufficient to allow any conclusion about variant significance. To our knowledge, no occurrence of c.148T>C in individuals affected with Lynch Syndrome and no experimental evidence demonstrating its impact on protein function have been reported. Four clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar after 2014 and classified the variant VUS (n=1) and likely benign (n=3). Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as uncertain significance. - |
not provided Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | May 08, 2023 | Not observed at significant frequency in large population cohorts (gnomAD); In silico analysis supports that this missense variant does not alter protein structure/function; Has not been previously published as pathogenic or benign to our knowledge; This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 23621914) - |
Hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal neoplasms Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Dec 14, 2023 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at