rs3746255

Positions:

chr19-35033642-C-T

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -19 ACMG points: 0P and 19B. BP4_ModerateBP6_Very_StrongBP7BS1BS2

The NM_001037.5(SCN1B):c.351C>T(p.Gly117=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00118 in 1,614,200 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 25 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0011 ( 1 hom., cov: 32)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.0012 ( 24 hom. )

Consequence

SCN1B
NM_001037.5 synonymous

Scores

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:11

Conservation

PhyloP100: -5.25

Variant links:

Genes affected

SCN1B (HGNC:10586): (sodium voltage-gated channel beta subunit 1) Voltage-gated sodium channels are heteromeric proteins that function in the generation and propagation of action potentials in muscle and neuronal cells. They are composed of one alpha and two beta subunits, where the alpha subunit provides channel activity and the beta-1 subunit modulates the kinetics of channel inactivation. This gene encodes a sodium channel beta-1 subunit. Mutations in this gene result in generalized epilepsy with febrile seizures plus, Brugada syndrome 5, and defects in cardiac conduction. Multiple transcript variants encoding different isoforms have been found for this gene.[provided by RefSeq, Oct 2009]

SCN1B links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -19 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.38).

BP6

Variant 19-35033642-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr19-35033642-C-T is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 138995.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr19-35033642-C-T is described in Lovd as [Benign]. Variant chr19-35033642-C-T is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].

BP7

Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-5.26 with no splicing effect.

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population eas. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.00115 (175/152316) while in subpopulation EAS AF= 0.0266 (138/5186). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.023. There are 1 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 100 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck.

BS2

High AC in GnomAd4 at 175 AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	#exon/exons	MANE	Protein
SCN1B	NM_001037.5 linkuse as main transcript	c.351C>T	p.Gly117=	synonymous_variant	3/6	ENST00000262631.11	NP_001028.1
SCN1B	NM_199037.5 linkuse as main transcript	c.351C>T	p.Gly117=	synonymous_variant	3/3		NP_950238.1
SCN1B	NM_001321605.2 linkuse as main transcript	c.252C>T	p.Gly84=	synonymous_variant	3/6		NP_001308534.1

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	#exon/exons	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
SCN1B	ENST00000262631.11 linkuse as main transcript	c.351C>T	p.Gly117=	synonymous_variant	3/6	1	NM_001037.5	ENSP00000262631	P1	Q07699-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.00115

AC:

175

AN:

152198

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.000338

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.000262

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.0267

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00207

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00318

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.0000588

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00144

GnomAD3 exomes

AF:

0.00247

AC:

620

AN:

251492

Hom.:

AF XY:

0.00247

AC XY:

336

AN XY:

135922

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.000308

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.0000578

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.0285

Gnomad SAS exome

AF:

0.00258

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.0000439

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.000814

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.00118

AC:

1727

AN:

1461884

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.00125

AC XY:

908

AN XY:

727246

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR exome

AF:

0.000299

Gnomad4 AMR exome

AF:

0.0000671

Gnomad4 ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS exome

AF:

0.0330

Gnomad4 SAS exome

AF:

0.00284

Gnomad4 FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE exome

AF:

0.0000369

Gnomad4 OTH exome

AF:

0.00190

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.00115

AC:

175

AN:

152316

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.00134

AC XY:

100

AN XY:

74466

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR

AF:

0.000337

Gnomad4 AMR

AF:

0.000261

Gnomad4 ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS

AF:

0.0266

Gnomad4 SAS

AF:

0.00228

Gnomad4 FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE

AF:

0.0000588

Gnomad4 OTH

AF:

0.00142

Alfa

AF:

0.000176

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.00157

Asia WGS

AF:

0.0140

AC:

AN:

3478

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign

Submissions summary: Benign:11

Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified

Benign:5

Benign, no assertion criteria provided	clinical testing	Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht	-	- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	GeneDx	Jul 14, 2011	This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -
Benign, no assertion criteria provided	clinical testing	Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center	-	- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga)	May 14, 2015	- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp	Apr 29, 2024	- -

Brugada syndrome 5

Benign:2

Benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina	Jan 12, 2018	This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp	Jan 29, 2024	- -

not provided

Benign:2

Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided	clinical testing	Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+	-	- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories	Aug 26, 2023	- -

Generalized epilepsy with febrile seizures plus, type 1

Benign:1

Benign, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Jan 12, 2018

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Cardiovascular phenotype

Benign:1

Benign, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

Ambry Genetics

May 19, 2016

This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.38

CADD

Benign

2.6

DANN

Benign

0.83

RBP_binding_hub_radar

0.0

RBP_regulation_power_radar

1.7

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over