rs374702981
Variant summary
Our verdict is Uncertain significance. Variant got 0 ACMG points: 0P and 0B.
The NM_001283009.2(RTEL1):c.1596-8G>A variant causes a splice region, intron change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000273 in 1,612,410 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 3/3 splice prediction tools predicting alterations to normal splicing. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_001283009.2 splice_region, intron
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Uncertain_significance. Variant got 0 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RTEL1 | NM_001283009.2 | c.1596-8G>A | splice_region_variant, intron_variant | ENST00000360203.11 | NP_001269938.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RTEL1 | ENST00000360203.11 | c.1596-8G>A | splice_region_variant, intron_variant | 5 | NM_001283009.2 | ENSP00000353332.5 | ||||
RTEL1 | ENST00000508582.7 | c.1668-8G>A | splice_region_variant, intron_variant | 2 | ENSP00000424307.2 | |||||
RTEL1 | ENST00000370018.7 | c.1596-8G>A | splice_region_variant, intron_variant | 1 | ENSP00000359035.3 | |||||
RTEL1-TNFRSF6B | ENST00000492259.6 | n.1680-8G>A | splice_region_variant, intron_variant | 5 | ENSP00000457428.1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0000329 AC: 5AN: 152136Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.0000321 AC: 8AN: 249404Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.0000295 AC XY: 4AN XY: 135450
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0000267 AC: 39AN: 1460274Hom.: 0 Cov.: 46 AF XY: 0.0000234 AC XY: 17AN XY: 726398
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0000329 AC: 5AN: 152136Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.00 AC XY: 0AN XY: 74308
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine | Mar 01, 2018 | The c.1668-8G>A variant in RTEL1 has not been previously reported in individuals with dyskeratosis congenita or pulmonary fibrosis, but has been identified in 7 /125882 of European 2/30774 South Asian chromosomes and by the Genome Aggregatio n Database (gnomAD, http://gnomad.broadinstitute.org; dbSNP rs374702981). This v ariant has been reported in ClinVar (Variation ID: 473908). This variant is loca ted in the 3' splice region. Computational tools suggest a possible impact to sp licing. However, this information is not predictive enough to determine pathogen icity. In summary, the clinical significance of the c.1668-8G>A variant is uncer tain. ACMG/AMP Criteria applied: PM2, PP3. - |
Dyskeratosis congenita, autosomal recessive 5;C4225346:Pulmonary fibrosis and/or bone marrow failure, Telomere-related, 3 Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jul 19, 2022 | This sequence change falls in intron 18 of the RTEL1 gene. It does not directly change the encoded amino acid sequence of the RTEL1 protein. This variant is present in population databases (rs374702981, gnomAD 0.006%). This variant has not been reported in the literature in individuals affected with RTEL1-related conditions. ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 473908). Algorithms developed to predict the effect of sequence changes on RNA splicing suggest that this variant may disrupt the consensus splice site. In summary, the available evidence is currently insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease. Therefore, it has been classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. - |
Dyskeratosis congenita Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Natera, Inc. | Nov 11, 2019 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at