Menu
GeneBe

rs374926367

Variant summary

Our verdict is Uncertain significance. Variant got 1 ACMG points: 3P and 2B. PM2PP2BP4_Moderate

The NM_170707.4(LMNA):c.1978A>G(p.Asn660Asp) variant causes a missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000911 in 1,613,560 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.000099 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.000090 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

LMNA
NM_170707.4 missense

Scores

6
12

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:7B:1

Conservation

PhyloP100: 4.35
Variant links:
Genes affected
LMNA (HGNC:6636): (lamin A/C) The protein encoded by this gene is part of the nuclear lamina, a two-dimensional matrix of proteins located next to the inner nuclear membrane. The lamin family of proteins make up the matrix and are highly conserved in evolution. During mitosis, the lamina matrix is reversibly disassembled as the lamin proteins are phosphorylated. Lamin proteins are thought to be involved in nuclear stability, chromatin structure and gene expression. Vertebrate lamins consist of two types, A and B. Alternative splicing results in multiple transcript variants. Mutations in this gene lead to several diseases: Emery-Dreifuss muscular dystrophy, familial partial lipodystrophy, limb girdle muscular dystrophy, dilated cardiomyopathy, Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease, and Hutchinson-Gilford progeria syndrome. [provided by RefSeq, May 2022]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Uncertain_significance. Variant got 1 ACMG points.

PM2
Very rare variant in population databases, with high coverage;
PP2
Missense variant where missense usually causes diseases, LMNA
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.105621755).

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE UniProt
LMNANM_170707.4 linkuse as main transcriptc.1978A>G p.Asn660Asp missense_variant 12/12 ENST00000368300.9

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Appris UniProt
LMNAENST00000368300.9 linkuse as main transcriptc.1978A>G p.Asn660Asp missense_variant 12/121 NM_170707.4 P1P02545-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.0000988
AC:
15
AN:
151754
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.000661
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.000118
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.000115
AC:
29
AN:
251214
Hom.:
0
AF XY:
0.000125
AC XY:
17
AN XY:
135804
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.000973
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.0000704
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.0000903
AC:
132
AN:
1461806
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.0000743
AC XY:
54
AN XY:
727208
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.000693
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.0000836
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.0000331
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.0000988
AC:
15
AN:
151754
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.0000675
AC XY:
5
AN XY:
74098
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.000661
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.000118
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00
Alfa
AF:
0.000115
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.0000416
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.000116
AC:
1
ExAC
AF:
0.0000412
AC:
5
EpiCase
AF:
0.000109
EpiControl
AF:
0.0000593

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:7Benign:1
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided Uncertain:3
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingEurofins Ntd Llc (ga)Jan 11, 2018- -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxAug 17, 2017The N660D variant has not been published as a pathogenic variant, nor has it been reported as a benign variant to our knowledge. It was not observed with any significant frequency in approximately 4,300 individuals of European and African American ancestry in the NHLBI Exome Sequencing Project. The N660D variant is a semi-conservative amino acid substitution, which may impact secondary protein structure as these residues differ in some properties. This substitution occurs at a position that is conserved in mammals. In silico analysis is inconsistent in its predictions as to whether or not the variant is damaging to the protein structure/function.LMNA-related disorders can be inherited in an autosomal recessive or an autosomal dominant manner (De Sandre-Giovannoli et al., 2002; Bonne et al., 2004; Rankin et al., 2008). Additionally, a small number of dominantly inherited variants have been reported to have incomplete penetrance (Vytopil et al., 2002). This result is not sufficient to definitively determine whether or not this variant is a pathogenic or benign variant. -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingRevvity Omics, RevvityMar 15, 2021- -
Cardiomyopathy Uncertain:2
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingColor Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color HealthDec 09, 2022This missense variant replaces asparagine with aspartic acid at codon 660 of the lamin A protein. Computational prediction suggests that this variant may not impact protein structure and function (internally defined REVEL score threshold <= 0.5, PMID: 27666373). To our knowledge, functional studies have not been reported for this variant. This variant has not been reported in individuals affected with cardiovascular disorders in the literature. This variant has been identified in 35/282436 chromosomes in the general population by the Genome Aggregation Database (gnomAD). The available evidence is insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease conclusively. Therefore, this variant is classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCHEO Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, Children's Hospital of Eastern OntarioOct 25, 2022- -
Primary dilated cardiomyopathy Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAll of Us Research Program, National Institutes of HealthSep 17, 2023This missense variant replaces asparagine with aspartic acid at codon 660 of the lamin A protein. Computational prediction suggests that this variant may not impact protein structure and function (internally defined REVEL score threshold <= 0.5, PMID: 27666373). To our knowledge, functional studies have not been reported for this variant. This variant has not been reported in individuals affected with cardiovascular disorders in the literature. This variant has been identified in 35/282436 chromosomes in the general population by the Genome Aggregation Database (gnomAD). The available evidence is insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease conclusively. Therefore, this variant is classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. -
Cardiovascular phenotype Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAmbry GeneticsOct 30, 2023The p.N660D variant (also known as c.1978A>G), located in coding exon 12 of the LMNA gene, results from an A to G substitution at nucleotide position 1978. The asparagine at codon 660 is replaced by aspartic acid, an amino acid with highly similar properties. This amino acid position is well conserved in available vertebrate species. In addition, the in silico prediction for this alteration is inconclusive. Since supporting evidence is limited at this time, the clinical significance of this alteration remains unclear. -
Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease type 2 Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingInvitaeJan 20, 2024- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.20
CardioboostCm
Benign
0.012
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.039
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.11
Cadd
Uncertain
24
Dann
Uncertain
0.99
Eigen
Benign
-0.14
Eigen_PC
Benign
0.035
FATHMM_MKL
Uncertain
0.95
D
LIST_S2
Benign
0.83
T;T;T;T;T;T
M_CAP
Uncertain
0.17
D
MetaRNN
Benign
0.11
T;T;T;T;T;T
MetaSVM
Uncertain
-0.045
T
MutationTaster
Benign
0.97
D;D;D;D;N
PrimateAI
Uncertain
0.72
T
PROVEAN
Benign
-0.46
N;N;N;N;N;N
REVEL
Uncertain
0.30
Sift
Benign
0.044
D;D;D;D;D;D
Sift4G
Benign
0.25
T;T;T;T;T;T
Polyphen
0.072
B;B;.;.;.;.
Vest4
0.40
MVP
0.74
MPC
0.48
ClinPred
0.13
T
GERP RS
4.7
RBP_binding_hub_radar
0.0
RBP_regulation_power_radar
1.7
Varity_R
0.15
gMVP
0.46

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs374926367; hg19: chr1-156108880; API