rs374926367
Variant summary
Our verdict is Uncertain significance. Variant got 1 ACMG points: 3P and 2B. PM2PP2BP4_Moderate
The NM_170707.4(LMNA):c.1978A>G(p.Asn660Asp) variant causes a missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000911 in 1,613,560 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.000099 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.000090 ( 0 hom. )
Consequence
LMNA
NM_170707.4 missense
NM_170707.4 missense
Scores
6
12
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: 4.35
Genes affected
LMNA (HGNC:6636): (lamin A/C) The protein encoded by this gene is part of the nuclear lamina, a two-dimensional matrix of proteins located next to the inner nuclear membrane. The lamin family of proteins make up the matrix and are highly conserved in evolution. During mitosis, the lamina matrix is reversibly disassembled as the lamin proteins are phosphorylated. Lamin proteins are thought to be involved in nuclear stability, chromatin structure and gene expression. Vertebrate lamins consist of two types, A and B. Alternative splicing results in multiple transcript variants. Mutations in this gene lead to several diseases: Emery-Dreifuss muscular dystrophy, familial partial lipodystrophy, limb girdle muscular dystrophy, dilated cardiomyopathy, Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease, and Hutchinson-Gilford progeria syndrome. [provided by RefSeq, May 2022]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Uncertain_significance. Variant got 1 ACMG points.
PM2
?
Very rare variant in population databases, with high coverage;
PP2
?
Missense variant where missense usually causes diseases, LMNA
BP4
?
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.105621755).
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LMNA | NM_170707.4 | c.1978A>G | p.Asn660Asp | missense_variant | 12/12 | ENST00000368300.9 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LMNA | ENST00000368300.9 | c.1978A>G | p.Asn660Asp | missense_variant | 12/12 | 1 | NM_170707.4 | P1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes ? AF: 0.0000988 AC: 15AN: 151754Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 genomes
?
AF:
AC:
15
AN:
151754
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.000115 AC: 29AN: 251214Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.000125 AC XY: 17AN XY: 135804
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
29
AN:
251214
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
17
AN XY:
135804
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0000903 AC: 132AN: 1461806Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.0000743 AC XY: 54AN XY: 727208
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
132
AN:
1461806
Hom.:
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
AC XY:
54
AN XY:
727208
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome ? AF: 0.0000988 AC: 15AN: 151754Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0000675 AC XY: 5AN XY: 74098
GnomAD4 genome
?
AF:
AC:
15
AN:
151754
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
AC XY:
5
AN XY:
74098
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
ESP6500AA
AF:
AC:
0
ESP6500EA
AF:
AC:
1
ExAC
?
AF:
AC:
5
EpiCase
AF:
EpiControl
AF:
ClinVar
Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:7Benign:1
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Uncertain:3
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga) | Jan 11, 2018 | - - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Aug 17, 2017 | The N660D variant has not been published as a pathogenic variant, nor has it been reported as a benign variant to our knowledge. It was not observed with any significant frequency in approximately 4,300 individuals of European and African American ancestry in the NHLBI Exome Sequencing Project. The N660D variant is a semi-conservative amino acid substitution, which may impact secondary protein structure as these residues differ in some properties. This substitution occurs at a position that is conserved in mammals. In silico analysis is inconsistent in its predictions as to whether or not the variant is damaging to the protein structure/function.LMNA-related disorders can be inherited in an autosomal recessive or an autosomal dominant manner (De Sandre-Giovannoli et al., 2002; Bonne et al., 2004; Rankin et al., 2008). Additionally, a small number of dominantly inherited variants have been reported to have incomplete penetrance (Vytopil et al., 2002). This result is not sufficient to definitively determine whether or not this variant is a pathogenic or benign variant. - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Revvity Omics, Revvity | Mar 15, 2021 | - - |
Cardiomyopathy Uncertain:2
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health | Dec 09, 2022 | This missense variant replaces asparagine with aspartic acid at codon 660 of the lamin A protein. Computational prediction suggests that this variant may not impact protein structure and function (internally defined REVEL score threshold <= 0.5, PMID: 27666373). To our knowledge, functional studies have not been reported for this variant. This variant has not been reported in individuals affected with cardiovascular disorders in the literature. This variant has been identified in 35/282436 chromosomes in the general population by the Genome Aggregation Database (gnomAD). The available evidence is insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease conclusively. Therefore, this variant is classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | CHEO Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario | Oct 25, 2022 | - - |
Primary dilated cardiomyopathy Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | All of Us Research Program, National Institutes of Health | Sep 17, 2023 | This missense variant replaces asparagine with aspartic acid at codon 660 of the lamin A protein. Computational prediction suggests that this variant may not impact protein structure and function (internally defined REVEL score threshold <= 0.5, PMID: 27666373). To our knowledge, functional studies have not been reported for this variant. This variant has not been reported in individuals affected with cardiovascular disorders in the literature. This variant has been identified in 35/282436 chromosomes in the general population by the Genome Aggregation Database (gnomAD). The available evidence is insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease conclusively. Therefore, this variant is classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. - |
Cardiovascular phenotype Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Oct 30, 2023 | The p.N660D variant (also known as c.1978A>G), located in coding exon 12 of the LMNA gene, results from an A to G substitution at nucleotide position 1978. The asparagine at codon 660 is replaced by aspartic acid, an amino acid with highly similar properties. This amino acid position is well conserved in available vertebrate species. In addition, the in silico prediction for this alteration is inconclusive. Since supporting evidence is limited at this time, the clinical significance of this alteration remains unclear. - |
Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease type 2 Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Invitae | Jan 20, 2024 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
CardioboostCm
Benign
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
Cadd
Uncertain
Dann
Uncertain
Eigen
Benign
Eigen_PC
Benign
FATHMM_MKL
Uncertain
D
LIST_S2
Benign
T;T;T;T;T;T
M_CAP
Uncertain
D
MetaRNN
Benign
T;T;T;T;T;T
MetaSVM
Uncertain
T
MutationTaster
Benign
D;D;D;D;N
PrimateAI
Uncertain
T
PROVEAN
Benign
N;N;N;N;N;N
REVEL
Uncertain
Sift
Benign
D;D;D;D;D;D
Sift4G
Benign
T;T;T;T;T;T
Polyphen
B;B;.;.;.;.
Vest4
MVP
MPC
0.48
ClinPred
T
GERP RS
RBP_binding_hub_radar
RBP_regulation_power_radar
Varity_R
gMVP
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at