rs375062187

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -10 ACMG points: 0P and 10B. BP4_StrongBP6BP7BS1

The NM_032119.4(ADGRV1):​c.14373T>A​(p.Ala4791Ala) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000131 in 1,613,930 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 1 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.000092 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00014 ( 1 hom. )

Consequence

ADGRV1
NM_032119.4 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:2B:6

Conservation

PhyloP100: -0.649

Publications

0 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
ADGRV1 (HGNC:17416): (adhesion G protein-coupled receptor V1) This gene encodes a member of the G-protein coupled receptor superfamily. The encoded protein contains a 7-transmembrane receptor domain, binds calcium and is expressed in the central nervous system. Mutations in this gene are associated with Usher syndrome 2 and familial febrile seizures. Several alternatively spliced transcripts have been described. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]
ADGRV1 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • Usher syndrome type 2
    Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: ClinGen, Orphanet
  • Usher syndrome type 2C
    Inheritance: AR Classification: STRONG Submitted by: G2P, PanelApp Australia, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
  • febrile seizures, familial, 4
    Inheritance: AD Classification: LIMITED Submitted by: Ambry Genetics
  • nonsyndromic genetic hearing loss
    Inheritance: AR Classification: NO_KNOWN Submitted by: ClinGen

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -10 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.7).
BP6
Variant 5-90791202-T-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr5-90791202-T-A is described in ClinVar as Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity. ClinVar VariationId is 227393.
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-0.649 with no splicing effect.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population mid. GnomAdExome4 allele frequency = 0.000135 (198/1461576) while in subpopulation MID AF = 0.0052 (30/5768). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00374. There are 1 homozygotes in GnomAdExome4. There are 110 alleles in the male GnomAdExome4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position passed quality control check.

Variant Effect in Transcripts

ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_032119.4. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.

RefSeq Transcripts

Selected
GeneTranscriptTagsHGVScHGVSpEffectExon RankProteinUniProt
ADGRV1
NM_032119.4
MANE Select
c.14373T>Ap.Ala4791Ala
synonymous
Exon 70 of 90NP_115495.3
ADGRV1
NR_003149.2
n.14389T>A
non_coding_transcript_exon
Exon 70 of 90

Ensembl Transcripts

Selected
GeneTranscriptTagsHGVScHGVSpEffectExon RankProteinUniProt
ADGRV1
ENST00000405460.9
TSL:1 MANE Select
c.14373T>Ap.Ala4791Ala
synonymous
Exon 70 of 90ENSP00000384582.2
ADGRV1
ENST00000638510.1
TSL:1
n.1640T>A
non_coding_transcript_exon
Exon 6 of 26
ADGRV1
ENST00000425867.3
TSL:5
c.3327T>Ap.Ala1109Ala
synonymous
Exon 18 of 38ENSP00000392618.3

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.0000920
AC:
14
AN:
152236
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.0000724
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.0000654
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.000207
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00316
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.000118
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.000133
AC:
33
AN:
248730
AF XY:
0.000156
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.0000646
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.000116
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.000177
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00116
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.000135
AC:
198
AN:
1461576
Hom.:
1
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.000151
AC XY:
110
AN XY:
727050
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.000806
AC:
27
AN:
33480
American (AMR)
AF:
0.000134
AC:
6
AN:
44686
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.0000383
AC:
1
AN:
26128
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
39688
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.0000116
AC:
1
AN:
86238
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
53386
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00520
AC:
30
AN:
5768
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.0000971
AC:
108
AN:
1111834
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.000414
AC:
25
AN:
60368
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.485
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
13
25
38
50
63
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Variant carriers
0
10
20
30
40
50
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.0000919
AC:
14
AN:
152354
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.0000940
AC XY:
7
AN XY:
74500
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.0000722
AC:
3
AN:
41568
American (AMR)
AF:
0.0000653
AC:
1
AN:
15304
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
3472
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
5192
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.000207
AC:
1
AN:
4834
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
10624
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00340
AC:
1
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.000118
AC:
8
AN:
68038
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
2116
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.496
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
1
2
2
3
4
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Variant carriers
0
2
4
6
8
10
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.000179
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.0000982
Asia WGS
AF:
0.000577
AC:
2
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.000545
EpiControl
AF:
0.000475

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:2Benign:6
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided Uncertain:2Benign:3
Dec 07, 2015
Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga)
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

Mar 04, 2019
Athena Diagnostics
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Feb 03, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

not specified Benign:2
Mar 04, 2015
Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

p.Ala4791Ala in exon 70 of GPR98: This variant is not expected to have clinical significance because it does not alter an amino acid residue and is not located within the splice consensus sequence. In addition, it has been identified in 12/ 65972 European chromosomes by the Exome Aggregation Consortium (ExAC, http://exa c.broadinstitute.org; dbSNP rs375062187).

Nov 17, 2017
GeneDx
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease.

ADGRV1-related disorder Benign:1
Jul 15, 2024
PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications).

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.9

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.70
CADD
Benign
4.4
DANN
Benign
0.61
PhyloP100
-0.65
PromoterAI
0.016
Neutral
Mutation Taster
=93/7
polymorphism

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.030
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs375062187; hg19: chr5-90087019; API