rs375158290
Variant summary
Our verdict is Uncertain significance. The variant received 4 ACMG points: 4P and 0B. PM2PP3_Moderate
The NM_001206927.2(DNAH8):c.11729T>A(p.Phe3910Tyr) variant causes a missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000335 in 1,613,968 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a pathogenic outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. F3910S) has been classified as Uncertain significance.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_001206927.2 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Uncertain_significance. The variant received 4 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
| Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DNAH8 | NM_001206927.2 | c.11729T>A | p.Phe3910Tyr | missense_variant | Exon 78 of 93 | ENST00000327475.11 | NP_001193856.1 |
Ensembl
| Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DNAH8 | ENST00000327475.11 | c.11729T>A | p.Phe3910Tyr | missense_variant | Exon 78 of 93 | 5 | NM_001206927.2 | ENSP00000333363.7 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0000263 AC: 4AN: 152132Hom.: 0 Cov.: 31 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.0000358 AC: 9AN: 251084 AF XY: 0.0000295 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0000342 AC: 50AN: 1461836Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.0000234 AC XY: 17AN XY: 727220 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0000263 AC: 4AN: 152132Hom.: 0 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.0000135 AC XY: 1AN XY: 74300 show subpopulations ⚠️ The allele balance in gnomAD version 4 Genomes is significantly skewed from the expected value of 0.5.
Age Distribution
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Uncertain:1
- -
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at