rs3752579
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -13 ACMG points: 0P and 13B. BP4_StrongBP6BS1BS2
The NM_001105206.3(LAMA4):c.1475T>A(p.Leu492His) variant causes a missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00124 in 1,613,914 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 33 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Another nucleotide change resulting in same amino acid change has been previously reported as Likely benignin UniProt.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_001105206.3 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -13 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LAMA4 | NM_001105206.3 | c.1475T>A | p.Leu492His | missense_variant | 12/39 | ENST00000230538.12 | NP_001098676.2 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LAMA4 | ENST00000230538.12 | c.1475T>A | p.Leu492His | missense_variant | 12/39 | 1 | NM_001105206.3 | ENSP00000230538.7 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00119 AC: 181AN: 152092Hom.: 1 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00314 AC: 789AN: 251350Hom.: 6 AF XY: 0.00249 AC XY: 338AN XY: 135830
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00125 AC: 1823AN: 1461704Hom.: 32 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.00121 AC XY: 880AN XY: 727140
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00118 AC: 180AN: 152210Hom.: 1 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00144 AC XY: 107AN XY: 74414
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Uncertain:1Benign:5
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine | Oct 22, 2015 | p.Leu485His in exon 12 of LAMA4: This variant is not expected to have clinical s ignificance because it has been identified in 1.6% (189/11562) of Latino chromos omes by the Exome Aggregation Consortium (ExAC, http://exac.broadinstitute.org; dbSNP rs3752579). - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+ | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Apr 08, 2015 | This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. - |
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Stanford Center for Inherited Cardiovascular Disease, Stanford University | Jul 24, 2015 | Note this variant was found in clinical genetic testing performed by one or more labs who may also submit to ClinVar. Thus any internal case data may overlap with the internal case data of other labs. The interpretation reviewed below is that of the Stanford Center for Inherited Cardiovascular Disease. LAMA4 p.Leu485His We classify this as a VUS-probably benign. This variant has not been published in the literature in association with cardiomyopathy. By contrast, it has been detected in presumably unaffected individuals in population datasets (see below). Furthermore, the LAMA4 gene might rightly be called a “gene of uncertain significance” given the paucity of data: there are only 2 variants listed in HGMD for this gene, both associated with DCM. No variation at residues near Leu485His has been associated with cardiomyopathy (HGMD professional version as of January 17, 2014). This is a non-conservative amino acid change, resulting in the replacement of a nonpolar Leucine with a positively-charged Histidine. This location is conserved across species. In silico analysis was inconsistent with regard to the effect on protein structure/function. In total the variant has been seen in 10 individuals from publicly available population datasets. It was observed in 10 individuals in the 1000 Genomes Project: 6 Han Chinese, 2 Japanese, and 2 Mexican (http://browser.1000genomes.org/index.htm) as of April 15, 2014. This raises the possibility that it may be a benign variant found more often in certain ethnicities. This variant is not listed in the NHLBI Exome Sequencing Project dataset (http://evs.gs.washington.edu/EVS/), which currently includes variant calls on ~3500 Caucasian and ~1800 African American individuals. The phenotype of the ESP individuals is not publicly available, however the cohorts that were merged to create this dataset were all either general population samples or samples recruited for common cardiovascular disease such as hypertension. It is listed in dpSNP as rs3752579, with multiple submitters including 1000 Genomes. - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Diagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen | - | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center | - | - - |
Dilated cardiomyopathy 1JJ Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 24, 2024 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories | Nov 11, 2023 | - - |
not provided Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | research | Biesecker Lab/Clinical Genomics Section, National Institutes of Health | Jun 24, 2013 | - - |
Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy;C0878544:Cardiomyopathy Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Center for Advanced Laboratory Medicine, UC San Diego Health, University of California San Diego | Dec 13, 2018 | - - |
Cardiovascular phenotype Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | May 14, 2016 | This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at