rs375626512

Variant names:

Your query was ambiguous. Multiple possible variants found:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -14 ACMG points: 0P and 14B. BP4_StrongBP6BP7BS1BS2

The NM_001134363.3(RBM20):c.1659G>A(p.Ser553Ser) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000163 in 1,551,742 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00042 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.00014 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

RBM20
NM_001134363.3 synonymous

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:1B:10

Conservation

PhyloP100: -3.43

Variant links:

Genes affected

RBM20 (HGNC:27424): (RNA binding motif protein 20) This gene encodes a protein that binds RNA and regulates splicing. Mutations in this gene have been associated with familial dilated cardiomyopathy. [provided by RefSeq, Apr 2014]

RBM20 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -14 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.65).

BP6

Variant 10-110797639-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr10-110797639-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 378473.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=5, Benign=1, Uncertain_significance=1}. Variant chr10-110797639-G-A is described in Lovd as [Benign]. Variant chr10-110797639-G-A is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].

BP7

Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-3.43 with no splicing effect.

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.00042 (64/152266) while in subpopulation AFR AF= 0.00132 (55/41554). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00104. There are 0 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 28 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck.

BS2

High AC in GnomAd4 at 64 AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
RBM20	NM_001134363.3 link	c.1659G>A	p.Ser553Ser	synonymous_variant	Exon 6 of 14	ENST00000369519.4	NP_001127835.2	Q5T481
RBM20	XM_017016103.3 link	c.1494G>A	p.Ser498Ser	synonymous_variant	Exon 6 of 14		XP_016871592.1
RBM20	XM_017016104.3 link	c.1275G>A	p.Ser425Ser	synonymous_variant	Exon 6 of 14		XP_016871593.1
RBM20	XM_047425116.1 link	c.1275G>A	p.Ser425Ser	synonymous_variant	Exon 6 of 14		XP_047281072.1

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
RBM20	ENST00000369519.4 link	c.1659G>A	p.Ser553Ser	synonymous_variant	Exon 6 of 14	1	NM_001134363.3	ENSP00000358532.3		Q5T481

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.000414

AC:

AN:

152148

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.00130

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.000131

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.0000882

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.000478

GnomAD3 exomes

AF:

0.000133

AC:

AN:

157484

Hom.:

AF XY:

0.0000962

AC XY:

AN XY:

83178

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.000862

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.000283

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS exome

AF:

0.0000878

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.0000654

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.000226

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.000135

AC:

189

AN:

1399476

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000119

AC XY:

AN XY:

690234

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR exome

AF:

0.00133

Gnomad4 AMR exome

AF:

0.000336

Gnomad4 ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS exome

AF:

0.0000379

Gnomad4 FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE exome

AF:

0.0000992

Gnomad4 OTH exome

AF:

0.000310

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.000420

AC:

AN:

152266

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000376

AC XY:

AN XY:

74442

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR

AF:

0.00132

Gnomad4 AMR

AF:

0.000131

Gnomad4 ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE

AF:

0.0000882

Gnomad4 OTH

AF:

0.000473

Alfa

AF:

0.000290

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.000525

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity

Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:10

Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Dilated cardiomyopathy 1DD

Uncertain:1Benign:2

Jan 29, 2025

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Jan 12, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -

Diagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

not specified

Benign:3

Oct 15, 2024

Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Apr 11, 2019

Molecular Diagnostic Laboratory for Inherited Cardiovascular Disease, Montreal Heart Institute

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center

Significance: Benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

not provided

Benign:3

Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Oct 02, 2019

GeneDx

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Cardiomyopathy

Benign:1

Jun 06, 2023

CHEO Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Cardiovascular phenotype

Benign:1

Oct 18, 2018

Ambry Genetics

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.65

CADD

Benign

2.5

DANN

Benign

0.60

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over