rs375633647

chr12-109788565-G-A

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_Strong BP6_Very_Strong BP7 BS1 BS2

The NM_021625.5(TRPV4):c.2043C>T(p.Gly681=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000274 in 1,614,244 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 1 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).

• Frequency:
  • Genomes: 𝑓 0.00028 (0 hom., cov: 33)
  • Exomes 𝑓: 0.00027 (1 hom.)
• Consequence: TRPV4 NM_021625.5 synonymous
• Clinical Significance: Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:15
• Conservation: PhyloP100: -1.11

Genes affected

TRPV4 (HGNC:18083): (transient receptor potential cation channel subfamily V member 4) This gene encodes a member of the OSM9-like transient receptor potential channel (OTRPC) subfamily in the transient receptor potential (TRP) superfamily of ion channels. The encoded protein is a Ca2+-permeable, nonselective cation channel that is thought to be involved in the regulation of systemic osmotic pressure. Mutations in this gene are the cause of spondylometaphyseal and metatropic dysplasia and hereditary motor and sensory neuropathy type IIC. Multiple transcript variants encoding different isoforms have been found for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Apr 2010]

ACMG classification

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points.

• BP4: Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.48).
• BP6: Variant 12-109788565-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr12-109788565-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 307124.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr12-109788565-G-A is described in Lovd as [Benign].
• BP7: Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-1.11 with no splicing effect.
• BS1: Variant frequency is greater than expected in population nfe. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.000276 (42/152374) while in subpopulation NFE AF= 0.000367 (25/68038). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.000255. There are 0 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 20 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. This position pass quality control queck.
• BS2: High AC in GnomAd at 42 AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	#exon/exons	MANE	UniProt
TRPV4	NM_021625.5	c.2043C>T	p.Gly681=	synonymous_variant	13/16	ENST00000261740.7

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	#exon/exons	TSL	MANE	Appris	UniProt
TRPV4	ENST00000261740.7	c.2043C>T	p.Gly681=	synonymous_variant	13/16	1	NM_021625.5	P1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.000276 AC: 42 AN: 152256 Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33

Gnomad AFR AF: 0.000145

Gnomad AMI AF: 0.00

Gnomad AMR AF: 0.00

Gnomad ASJ AF: 0.00288

Gnomad EAS AF: 0.00

Gnomad SAS AF: 0.000207

Gnomad FIN AF: 0.00

Gnomad MID AF: 0.00

Gnomad NFE AF: 0.000367

Gnomad OTH AF: 0.00

GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.000274 AC: 69 AN: 251480 Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.000294 AC XY: 40 AN XY: 135914

Gnomad AFR exome AF: 0.000246

Gnomad AMR exome AF: 0.0000578

Gnomad ASJ exome AF: 0.00347

Gnomad EAS exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad SAS exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad FIN exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad NFE exome AF: 0.000237

Gnomad OTH exome AF: 0.000163

GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000274 AC: 401 AN: 1461870 Hom.: 1 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.000292 AC XY: 212 AN XY: 727236

Gnomad4 AFR exome AF: 0.000179

Gnomad4 AMR exome AF: 0.0000894

Gnomad4 ASJ exome AF: 0.00375

Gnomad4 EAS exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 SAS exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 FIN exome AF: 0.0000187

Gnomad4 NFE exome AF: 0.000228

Gnomad4 OTH exome AF: 0.000613

GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.000276 AC: 42 AN: 152374 Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.000268 AC XY: 20 AN XY: 74514

Gnomad4 AFR AF: 0.000144

Gnomad4 AMR AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 ASJ AF: 0.00288

Gnomad4 EAS AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 SAS AF: 0.000207

Gnomad4 FIN AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 NFE AF: 0.000367

Gnomad4 OTH AF: 0.00

Alfa AF: 0.000640 Hom.: 0

Bravo AF: 0.000291

Asia WGS AF: 0.000289 AC: 1 AN: 3478

EpiCase AF: 0.000218

EpiControl AF: 0.000296

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign

Submissions summary: Benign:15

Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:3

Benign, no assertion criteria provided	clinical testing	Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+	-	- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories	Feb 24, 2019	- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Athena Diagnostics	Sep 01, 2016	- -

not provided Benign:3

Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided	clinical testing	Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center	-	- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen	Aug 01, 2023	TRPV4: BP4, BP7 -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	GeneDx	Mar 19, 2021	- -

Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease axonal type 2C Benign:2

Benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Invitae	Dec 11, 2023	- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina	Jan 13, 2018	This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. -

Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease Benign:1

Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

Molecular Genetics Laboratory, London Health Sciences Centre

-

- -

Inborn genetic diseases Benign:1

Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

Ambry Genetics

Jul 11, 2019

This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Neuronopathy, distal hereditary motor, autosomal dominant 8 Benign:1

Benign, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Jan 13, 2018

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Scapuloperoneal spinal muscular atrophy Benign:1

Benign, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Jan 13, 2018

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Brachyrachia (short spine dysplasia) Benign:1

Benign, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Jan 13, 2018

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Spondylometaphyseal dysplasia, Kozlowski type Benign:1

Benign, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Jan 13, 2018

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Metatropic dysplasia Benign:1

Benign, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Jan 13, 2018

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name	Calibrated prediction	Score	Prediction
BayesDel_noAF	Benign	-0.48
Cadd	Benign	7.3
Dann	Benign	0.65

Splicing

Name	Calibrated prediction	Score	Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)		0.0		Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs375633647; hg19: chr12-110226370;