rs375639642
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -6 ACMG points: 0P and 6B. BP4_ModerateBS2
The NM_015080.4(NRXN2):c.3965C>T(p.Ala1322Val) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000502 in 1,613,230 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 12/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_015080.4 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -6 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NRXN2 | NM_015080.4 | c.3965C>T | p.Ala1322Val | missense_variant | 21/23 | ENST00000265459.11 | NP_055895.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NRXN2 | ENST00000265459.11 | c.3965C>T | p.Ala1322Val | missense_variant | 21/23 | 5 | NM_015080.4 | ENSP00000265459.5 | ||
NRXN2 | ENST00000704782.1 | c.3974C>T | p.Ala1325Val | missense_variant | 20/22 | ENSP00000516031.1 | ||||
NRXN2 | ENST00000704781.1 | c.3974C>T | p.Ala1325Val | missense_variant | 20/22 | ENSP00000516029.1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0000263 AC: 4AN: 152244Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.0000243 AC: 6AN: 246636Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.0000299 AC XY: 4AN XY: 133954
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0000527 AC: 77AN: 1460986Hom.: 0 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.0000564 AC XY: 41AN XY: 726798
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0000263 AC: 4AN: 152244Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.00 AC XY: 0AN XY: 74378
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago | Mar 23, 2015 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at