rs3756672

Variant names:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2

The NM_001369.3(DNAH5):c.12472C>T(p.Arg4158Trp) variant causes a missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00222 in 1,613,842 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 86 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0022 ( 7 hom., cov: 32)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.0022 ( 79 hom. )

Consequence

DNAH5
NM_001369.3 missense

Scores

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:9

Conservation

PhyloP100: 3.88

Variant links:

Genes affected

DNAH5 (HGNC:2950): (dynein axonemal heavy chain 5) This gene encodes a dynein protein, which is part of a microtubule-associated motor protein complex consisting of heavy, light, and intermediate chains. This protein is an axonemal heavy chain dynein. It functions as a force-generating protein with ATPase activity, whereby the release of ADP is thought to produce the force-producing power stroke. Mutations in this gene cause primary ciliary dyskinesia type 3, as well as Kartagener syndrome, which are both diseases due to ciliary defects. [provided by RefSeq, Oct 2009]

DNAH5 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.012498289).

BP6

Variant 5-13718909-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr5-13718909-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 238959.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr5-13718909-G-A is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population eas. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.0022 (335/152250) while in subpopulation EAS AF= 0.0465 (241/5180). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0417. There are 7 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 185 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck.

BS2

High Homozygotes in GnomAd4 at 7 AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
DNAH5	NM_001369.3 link	c.12472C>T	p.Arg4158Trp	missense_variant	Exon 72 of 79	ENST00000265104.5	NP_001360.1	Q8TE73

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
DNAH5	ENST00000265104.5 link	c.12472C>T	p.Arg4158Trp	missense_variant	Exon 72 of 79	1	NM_001369.3	ENSP00000265104.4		Q8TE73
DNAH5	ENST00000681290.1 link	c.12427C>T	p.Arg4143Trp	missense_variant	Exon 72 of 79			ENSP00000505288.1		A0A7P0Z455

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.00220

AC:

334

AN:

152132

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.000193

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.000131

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.000864

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.0468

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.0143

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.0000441

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00287

GnomAD3 exomes

AF:

0.00449

AC:

1128

AN:

251204

Hom.:

AF XY:

0.00471

AC XY:

639

AN XY:

135760

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.000185

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.000116

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.000596

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.0373

Gnomad SAS exome

AF:

0.0133

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.0000352

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.00310

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.00222

AC:

3247

AN:

1461592

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.00253

AC XY:

1843

AN XY:

727108

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR exome

AF:

0.000149

Gnomad4 AMR exome

AF:

0.0000671

Gnomad4 ASJ exome

AF:

0.000612

Gnomad4 EAS exome

AF:

0.0475

Gnomad4 SAS exome

AF:

0.0123

Gnomad4 FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE exome

AF:

0.0000414

Gnomad4 OTH exome

AF:

0.00379

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.00220

AC:

335

AN:

152250

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.00249

AC XY:

185

AN XY:

74426

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR

AF:

0.000193

Gnomad4 AMR

AF:

0.000131

Gnomad4 ASJ

AF:

0.000864

Gnomad4 EAS

AF:

0.0465

Gnomad4 SAS

AF:

0.0143

Gnomad4 FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE

AF:

0.0000441

Gnomad4 OTH

AF:

0.00425

Alfa

AF:

0.00134

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.00174

ESP6500AA

AF:

0.00

AC:

ESP6500EA

AF:

0.000116

AC:

ExAC

AF:

0.00422

AC:

513

Asia WGS

AF:

0.0250

AC:

AN:

3478

EpiCase

AF:

0.000109

EpiControl

AF:

0.00

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign

Submissions summary: Benign:9

Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Primary ciliary dyskinesia

Benign:3

Jun 02, 2015

Ambry Genetics

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Jan 30, 2025

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Apr 20, 2020

Natera, Inc.

Significance: Benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Primary ciliary dyskinesia 3

Benign:3

Nov 30, 2021

Fulgent Genetics, Fulgent Genetics

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Jan 13, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. -

Mar 06, 2017

Counsyl

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

not provided

Benign:2

May 05, 2021

GeneDx

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

See Variant Classification Assertion Criteria. -

Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: not provided

- -

not specified

Benign:1

PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

AlphaMissense

Uncertain

0.48

BayesDel_addAF

Benign

-0.39

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.28

CADD

Pathogenic

DANN

Pathogenic

1.0

DEOGEN2

Uncertain

0.47

Eigen

Uncertain

0.59

Eigen_PC

Uncertain

0.50

FATHMM_MKL

Uncertain

0.96

LIST_S2

Pathogenic

1.0

MetaRNN

Benign

0.012

MetaSVM

Benign

-1.1

MutationAssessor

Pathogenic

3.5

PrimateAI

Uncertain

0.54

PROVEAN

Pathogenic

-6.4

REVEL

Uncertain

0.32

Sift

Pathogenic

0.0

Polyphen

1.0

Vest4

0.66

MVP

0.59

MPC

0.45

ClinPred

0.15

GERP RS

3.8

Varity_R

0.84

gMVP

0.82

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over