rs375893752

Variant names:

Your query was ambiguous. Multiple possible variants found:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -17 ACMG points: 0P and 17B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BS2

The NM_005343.4(HRAS):c.282C>T(p.His94His) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000192 in 1,461,040 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: not found (cov: 33)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.000019 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

HRAS
NM_005343.4 synonymous

Scores

Clinical Significance

Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:5

Conservation

PhyloP100: 2.12

Variant links:

Genes affected

HRAS (HGNC:5173): (HRas proto-oncogene, GTPase) This gene belongs to the Ras oncogene family, whose members are related to the transforming genes of mammalian sarcoma retroviruses. The products encoded by these genes function in signal transduction pathways. These proteins can bind GTP and GDP, and they have intrinsic GTPase activity. This protein undergoes a continuous cycle of de- and re-palmitoylation, which regulates its rapid exchange between the plasma membrane and the Golgi apparatus. Mutations in this gene cause Costello syndrome, a disease characterized by increased growth at the prenatal stage, growth deficiency at the postnatal stage, predisposition to tumor formation, cognitive disability, skin and musculoskeletal abnormalities, distinctive facial appearance and cardiovascular abnormalities. Defects in this gene are implicated in a variety of cancers, including bladder cancer, follicular thyroid cancer, and oral squamous cell carcinoma. Multiple transcript variants, which encode different isoforms, have been identified for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]

HRAS links:

LRRC56 (HGNC:25430): (leucine rich repeat containing 56) Predicted to be involved in cell projection organization. Predicted to be located in cilium. Implicated in primary ciliary dyskinesia 39. [provided by Alliance of Genome Resources, Apr 2022]

LRRC56 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -17 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.56).

BP6

Variant 11-533774-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr11-533774-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 45299.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.

BP7

Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=2.12 with no splicing effect.

BS2

High AC in GnomAdExome4 at 28 AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
HRAS	NM_005343.4 link	c.282C>T	p.His94His	synonymous_variant	Exon 3 of 6	ENST00000311189.8	NP_005334.1	P01112-1X5D945
HRAS	NM_176795.5 link	c.282C>T	p.His94His	synonymous_variant	Exon 3 of 6	ENST00000417302.7	NP_789765.1	P01112-2

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
HRAS	ENST00000311189.8 link	c.282C>T	p.His94His	synonymous_variant	Exon 3 of 6	1	NM_005343.4	ENSP00000309845.7		P01112-1
HRAS	ENST00000417302.7 link	c.282C>T	p.His94His	synonymous_variant	Exon 3 of 6	5	NM_176795.5	ENSP00000388246.1		P01112-2

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

Cov.:

GnomAD3 exomes

AF:

0.0000279

AC:

AN:

251188

Hom.:

AF XY:

0.0000221

AC XY:

AN XY:

135864

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS exome

AF:

0.0000327

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.0000528

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.00

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.0000192

AC:

AN:

1461040

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.0000165

AC XY:

AN XY:

726846

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 AMR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS exome

AF:

0.0000116

Gnomad4 FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE exome

AF:

0.0000234

Gnomad4 OTH exome

AF:

0.0000166

GnomAD4 genome

Cov.:

EpiCase

AF:

0.000109

EpiControl

AF:

0.00

ClinVar

Significance: Likely benign

Submissions summary: Benign:5

Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified

Benign:1

Oct 14, 2011

Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

His94His in exon 3 of HRAS: This variant is not expected to have clinical signif icance because it does not alter an amino acid residue and is not located near a splice junction. -

not provided

Benign:1

Dec 01, 2024

CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

HRAS: BP4, BP7 -

Costello syndrome

Benign:1

Jan 06, 2025

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Cardiovascular phenotype

Benign:1

Oct 14, 2022

Ambry Genetics

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

HRAS-related disorder

Benign:1

Mar 20, 2022

PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.56

CADD

Benign

3.6

DANN

Benign

0.95

RBP_binding_hub_radar

0.0

RBP_regulation_power_radar

2.7

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over