Menu
GeneBe

rs375909006

Variant summary

Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -6 ACMG points: 0P and 6B. BP4BP6BS1

The NM_001164507.2(NEB):c.194C>T(p.Pro65Leu) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000147 in 1,613,694 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 3 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 12/20 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Synonymous variant affecting the same amino acid position (i.e. P65P) has been classified as Likely benign.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.000098 ( 0 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00015 ( 3 hom. )

Consequence

NEB
NM_001164507.2 missense

Scores

1
6
11

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:6B:2O:1

Conservation

PhyloP100: 2.39
Variant links:
Genes affected
NEB (HGNC:7720): (nebulin) This gene encodes nebulin, a giant protein component of the cytoskeletal matrix that coexists with the thick and thin filaments within the sarcomeres of skeletal muscle. In most vertebrates, nebulin accounts for 3 to 4% of the total myofibrillar protein. The encoded protein contains approximately 30-amino acid long modules that can be classified into 7 types and other repeated modules. Protein isoform sizes vary from 600 to 800 kD due to alternative splicing that is tissue-, species-,and developmental stage-specific. Of the 183 exons in the nebulin gene, at least 43 are alternatively spliced, although exons 143 and 144 are not found in the same transcript. Of the several thousand transcript variants predicted for nebulin, the RefSeq Project has decided to create three representative RefSeq records. Mutations in this gene are associated with recessive nemaline myopathy. [provided by RefSeq, Sep 2009]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -6 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.29076654).
BP6
Variant 2-151727791-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr2-151727791-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 229041.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Uncertain_significance=6, Likely_benign=2, not_provided=1}.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population mid. gnomad4_exome allele frequency = 0.000152 (222/1461406) while in subpopulation MID AF= 0.0108 (62/5756). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00862. There are 3 homozygotes in gnomad4_exome. There are 124 alleles in male gnomad4_exome subpopulation. Median coverage is 31. This position pass quality control queck.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE UniProt
NEBNM_001164507.2 linkuse as main transcriptc.194C>T p.Pro65Leu missense_variant 5/182 ENST00000427231.7
NEBNM_001164508.2 linkuse as main transcriptc.194C>T p.Pro65Leu missense_variant 5/182 ENST00000397345.8

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Appris UniProt
NEBENST00000397345.8 linkuse as main transcriptc.194C>T p.Pro65Leu missense_variant 5/1825 NM_001164508.2 P5P20929-2
NEBENST00000427231.7 linkuse as main transcriptc.194C>T p.Pro65Leu missense_variant 5/1825 NM_001164507.2 A2P20929-3
NEBENST00000409198.5 linkuse as main transcriptc.194C>T p.Pro65Leu missense_variant 5/1505 P20929-4

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.0000986
AC:
15
AN:
152170
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
33
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.000131
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.000207
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.000162
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.000478
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.000125
AC:
31
AN:
248882
Hom.:
0
AF XY:
0.000141
AC XY:
19
AN XY:
135016
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.0000291
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.000163
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.000186
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.000663
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.000152
AC:
222
AN:
1461406
Hom.:
3
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.000171
AC XY:
124
AN XY:
726982
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.0000598
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.0000224
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.0000383
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.000185
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.000114
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.000215
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.0000985
AC:
15
AN:
152288
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.000107
AC XY:
8
AN XY:
74470
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.000131
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.000207
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.000162
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.000473
Alfa
AF:
0.000147
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.000140
TwinsUK
AF:
0.000270
AC:
1
ALSPAC
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.000241
AC:
2
ExAC
AF:
0.000141
AC:
17
EpiCase
AF:
0.000491
EpiControl
AF:
0.000237

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:6Benign:2Other:1
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Nemaline myopathy 2 Uncertain:3Benign:1Other:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 12, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCounsylJan 06, 2017- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingInvitaeJan 29, 2024- -
not provided, no classification providedphenotyping onlyGenomeConnect, ClinGen-Variant interpreted as Uncertain significance and reported on 10-03-2020 by Lab or GTR ID 500031. GenomeConnect assertions are reported exactly as they appear on the patient-provided report from the testing laboratory. GenomeConnect staff make no attempt to reinterpret the clinical significance of the variant. -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGenome-Nilou LabMay 18, 2021- -
not specified Uncertain:2Benign:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingWomen's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorpMay 09, 2023Variant summary: NEB c.194C>T (p.Pro65Leu) results in a non-conservative amino acid change in the encoded protein sequence. Two of four in-silico tools predict a benign effect of the variant on protein function. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00012 in 248882 control chromosomes. This frequency is not significantly higher than estimated for a pathogenic variant in NEB causing Nemaline Myopathy 2 (0.00012 vs 0.0035), allowing no conclusion about variant significance. c.194C>T has been reported in the literature in individuals affected Myopathies (Zenagui_2018, Morales_2021) without strong evidence for causality. These reports do not provide unequivocal conclusions about association of the variant with Nemaline Myopathy 2. To our knowledge, no experimental evidence demonstrating an impact on protein function has been reported. Seven clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar after 2014 without evidence for independent evaluation. The following publications have been ascertained in the context of this evaluation (PMID: 34440373, 29792937). Multiple laboratories reported the variant with conflicting assessments: VUS (n=5) and Likely Benign (n=2) . Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as uncertain significance. -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLaboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized MedicineMar 03, 2016The p.Pro65Leu variant in NEB has not been previously reported in individuals wi th myopathy, but has been identified in 12/66624 European chromosomes by the Exo me Aggregation Consortium (ExAC, http://exac.broadinstitute.org; dbSNP rs3759090 06). Computational prediction tools and conservation analysis do not provide str ong support for or against an impact to the protein. In summary, the clinical si gnificance of the p.Pro65Leu is uncertain. -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxFeb 28, 2018This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -
not provided Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingRevvity Omics, RevvityJan 17, 2023- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.12
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.33
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.42
Cadd
Benign
22
Dann
Uncertain
1.0
Eigen
Uncertain
0.34
Eigen_PC
Uncertain
0.45
FATHMM_MKL
Uncertain
0.95
D
LIST_S2
Uncertain
0.86
D;D;D;D;D;.;.
M_CAP
Benign
0.026
D
MetaRNN
Benign
0.29
T;T;T;T;T;T;T
MetaSVM
Benign
-0.98
T
MutationAssessor
Benign
0.69
N;N;.;N;N;N;N
MutationTaster
Benign
0.83
D;D;D;D
PrimateAI
Benign
0.47
T
PROVEAN
Benign
-1.8
N;N;.;N;N;.;.
REVEL
Benign
0.12
Sift
Pathogenic
0.0
D;D;.;D;D;.;.
Sift4G
Uncertain
0.021
D;D;D;D;D;D;D
Polyphen
0.90
.;.;.;.;P;.;.
Vest4
0.42
MVP
0.55
MPC
0.35
ClinPred
0.13
T
GERP RS
5.9
Varity_R
0.25
gMVP
0.23

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs375909006; hg19: chr2-152584305; API