rs376058351

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BS1BS2

The NM_005120.3(MED12):​c.4179A>C​(p.Ser1393Ser) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000266 in 1,208,809 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. There are 107 hemizygotes in GnomAD. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00014 ( 0 hom., 7 hem., cov: 23)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00028 ( 0 hom. 100 hem. )

Consequence

MED12
NM_005120.3 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:6

Conservation

PhyloP100: -0.414

Publications

1 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
MED12 (HGNC:11957): (mediator complex subunit 12) The initiation of transcription is controlled in part by a large protein assembly known as the preinitiation complex. A component of this preinitiation complex is a 1.2 MDa protein aggregate called Mediator. This Mediator component binds with a CDK8 subcomplex which contains the protein encoded by this gene, mediator complex subunit 12 (MED12), along with MED13, CDK8 kinase, and cyclin C. The CDK8 subcomplex modulates Mediator-polymerase II interactions and thereby regulates transcription initiation and reinitation rates. The MED12 protein is essential for activating CDK8 kinase. Defects in this gene cause X-linked Opitz-Kaveggia syndrome, also known as FG syndrome, and Lujan-Fryns syndrome. [provided by RefSeq, Aug 2009]
MED12 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • FG syndrome 1
    Inheritance: XL Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), G2P, Orphanet
  • MED12-related intellectual disability syndrome
    Inheritance: XL Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: ClinGen
  • X-linked intellectual disability with marfanoid habitus
    Inheritance: XL Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), G2P, Orphanet
  • blepharophimosis - intellectual disability syndrome, MKB type
    Inheritance: XL Classification: STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Orphanet
  • cholestasis-pigmentary retinopathy-cleft palate syndrome
    Inheritance: XL Classification: STRONG Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -21 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.78).
BP6
Variant X-71132132-A-C is Benign according to our data. Variant chrX-71132132-A-C is described in ClinVar as Benign/Likely_benign. ClinVar VariationId is 211475.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-0.414 with no splicing effect.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population nfe. GnomAd4 allele frequency = 0.000143 (16/112276) while in subpopulation NFE AF = 0.000263 (14/53239). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.000159. There are 0 homozygotes in GnomAd4. There are 7 alleles in the male GnomAd4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 23. This position passed quality control check.
BS2
High Hemizygotes in GnomAd4 at 7 XL gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
MED12NM_005120.3 linkc.4179A>C p.Ser1393Ser synonymous_variant Exon 30 of 45 ENST00000374080.8 NP_005111.2 Q93074-1

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
MED12ENST00000374080.8 linkc.4179A>C p.Ser1393Ser synonymous_variant Exon 30 of 45 1 NM_005120.3 ENSP00000363193.3 Q93074-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.000143
AC:
16
AN:
112276
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
23
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.0000647
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.000263
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.0000880
AC:
16
AN:
181776
AF XY:
0.0000888
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.000196
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.000279
AC:
306
AN:
1096533
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.000276
AC XY:
100
AN XY:
361903
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
26372
American (AMR)
AF:
0.0000284
AC:
1
AN:
35206
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
19376
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
30201
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
54095
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
40532
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
4132
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.000359
AC:
302
AN:
840567
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.0000651
AC:
3
AN:
46052
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.477
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
10
20
31
41
51
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
20
40
60
80
100
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.000143
AC:
16
AN:
112276
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
23
AF XY:
0.000203
AC XY:
7
AN XY:
34424
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.0000647
AC:
2
AN:
30927
American (AMR)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
10572
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
2649
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
3608
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
2710
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
6142
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
239
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.000263
AC:
14
AN:
53239
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
1502
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.481
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
1
2
3
4
5
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Genome Hom
Variant carriers
0
2
4
6
8
10
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.000213
Hom.:
2
Bravo
AF:
0.000147
EpiCase
AF:
0.000218
EpiControl
AF:
0.000178

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:6
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:2
Jun 30, 2016
Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jun 25, 2015
GeneDx
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

Familial thoracic aortic aneurysm and aortic dissection Benign:1
Apr 14, 2015
Ambry Genetics
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

FG syndrome Benign:1
Dec 26, 2024
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

not provided Benign:1
Jul 01, 2022
CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

MED12: BP4, BP7 -

MED12-related disorder Benign:1
May 05, 2021
PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.78
CADD
Benign
3.6
DANN
Benign
0.63
PhyloP100
-0.41
Mutation Taster
=96/4
polymorphism

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.030
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs376058351; hg19: chrX-70351982; API