rs376613662

Positions:

chr12-32878950-G-T

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -13 ACMG points: 0P and 13B. BP4_StrongBP6BS1BS2

The ENST00000340811.9(PKP2):c.306C>A(p.Ser102=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000235 in 1,598,000 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 2 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Synonymous variant affecting the same amino acid position (i.e. S102S) has been classified as Likely benign.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00011 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.00025 ( 2 hom. )

Consequence

PKP2
ENST00000340811.9 synonymous

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:1B:9

Conservation

PhyloP100: -0.507

Variant links:

Genes affected

PKP2 (HGNC:9024): (plakophilin 2) This gene encodes a member of the arm-repeat (armadillo) and plakophilin gene families. Plakophilin proteins contain numerous armadillo repeats, localize to cell desmosomes and nuclei, and participate in linking cadherins to intermediate filaments in the cytoskeleton. This gene may regulate the signaling activity of beta-catenin and is required to maintain transcription of genes that control intracellular calcium cycling including ryanodine receptor 2, ankyrin-B, triadin, and calcium channel, voltage-dependent, L type, alpha 1C. Mutations in this gene are associated with different inherited cardiac conditions including Arrythmogenic Cardiomyopathy, Brugada Syndrome, and Idiopathic Ventricular Fibrillation. A processed pseudogene with high similarity to this gene has been mapped to chromosome 12p13. [provided by RefSeq, May 2022]

PKP2 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -13 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.77).

BP6

Variant 12-32878950-G-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr12-32878950-G-T is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 227849.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Benign=1, Uncertain_significance=1, Likely_benign=7}. Variant chr12-32878950-G-T is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population sas. gnomad4_exome allele frequency = 0.000248 (358/1445880) while in subpopulation SAS AF= 0.00106 (91/85900). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.000884. There are 2 homozygotes in gnomad4_exome. There are 197 alleles in male gnomad4_exome subpopulation. Median coverage is 28. This position pass quality control queck.

BS2

High AC in GnomAd4 at 17 AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	#exon/exons	MANE	Protein	UniProt
PKP2	NM_001005242.3 linkuse as main transcript	c.306C>A	p.Ser102=	synonymous_variant	2/13	ENST00000340811.9	NP_001005242.2

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	#exon/exons	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
PKP2	ENST00000340811.9 linkuse as main transcript	c.306C>A	p.Ser102=	synonymous_variant	2/13	1	NM_001005242.3	ENSP00000342800	P1	Q99959-2

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.000112

AC:

AN:

152120

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.0000724

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.0000655

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.000191

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00

GnomAD3 exomes

AF:

0.000334

AC:

AN:

251422

Hom.:

AF XY:

0.000383

AC XY:

AN XY:

135886

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.000145

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS exome

AF:

0.000915

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.0000924

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.000431

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.00

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.000248

AC:

358

AN:

1445880

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000273

AC XY:

197

AN XY:

720328

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR exome

AF:

0.0000604

Gnomad4 AMR exome

AF:

0.0000895

Gnomad4 ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS exome

AF:

0.00106

Gnomad4 FIN exome

AF:

0.000112

Gnomad4 NFE exome

AF:

0.000221

Gnomad4 OTH exome

AF:

0.000201

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.000112

AC:

AN:

152120

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.0000942

AC XY:

AN XY:

74294

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR

AF:

0.0000724

Gnomad4 AMR

AF:

0.0000655

Gnomad4 ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE

AF:

0.000191

Gnomad4 OTH

AF:

0.00

Alfa

AF:

0.000115

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.000125

EpiCase

AF:

0.000273

EpiControl

AF:

0.000652

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity

Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:9

Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Cardiomyopathy

Benign:3

Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	CHEO Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario	Jun 14, 2023	- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health	Sep 28, 2018	- -
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided	clinical testing	Cohesion Phenomics	Oct 04, 2022	- -

Arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia 9

Uncertain:1Benign:1

Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina	Jan 13, 2018	This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp	Jan 28, 2024	- -

not specified

Benign:2

Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine	May 05, 2015	p.Ser102Ser in exon 2 of PKP2: This variant is not expected to have clinical sig nificance because it does not alter an amino acid residue and is not located wit hin the splice consensus sequence. It has been identified in 0.1% (22/16510) of South Asian chromosomes including 2 homozygotes and 37/66714 European chromosome s by the Exome Aggregation Consortium (ExAC, http://exac.broadinstitute.org/; db SNP rs376613662). -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp	Jan 15, 2024	- -

Arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy

Benign:1

Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

All of Us Research Program, National Institutes of Health

Feb 05, 2024

- -

not provided

Benign:1

Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

GeneDx

Sep 28, 2020

- -

Cardiovascular phenotype

Benign:1

Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

Ambry Genetics

Mar 28, 2024

This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.77

CADD

Benign

6.1

DANN

Benign

0.61

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over