rs3767698

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -14 ACMG points: 0P and 14B. BP4_StrongBP6BP7BA1

The NM_206933.4(USH2A):​c.879T>G​(p.Leu293Leu) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00237 in 1,613,342 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 121 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0028 ( 14 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0023 ( 107 hom. )

Consequence

USH2A
NM_206933.4 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:2B:5

Conservation

PhyloP100: -0.892

Publications

12 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
USH2A (HGNC:12601): (usherin) This gene encodes a protein that contains laminin EGF motifs, a pentaxin domain, and many fibronectin type III motifs. The protein is found in the basement membrane, and may be important in development and homeostasis of the inner ear and retina. Mutations within this gene have been associated with Usher syndrome type IIa and retinitis pigmentosa. Multiple transcript variants encoding different isoforms have been found for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Dec 2008]
USH2A Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • Usher syndrome type 2
    Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: ClinGen, Orphanet
  • Usher syndrome type 2A
    Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: G2P, PanelApp Australia, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
  • retinitis pigmentosa 39
    Inheritance: AR Classification: STRONG Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
  • retinitis pigmentosa
    Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -14 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.88).
BP6
Variant 1-216325569-A-C is Benign according to our data. Variant chr1-216325569-A-C is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 48609.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submission is: [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity].
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-0.892 with no splicing effect.
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (EAS) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.059 is higher than 0.05.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
USH2ANM_206933.4 linkc.879T>G p.Leu293Leu synonymous_variant Exon 6 of 72 ENST00000307340.8 NP_996816.3 O75445-1
USH2ANM_007123.6 linkc.879T>G p.Leu293Leu synonymous_variant Exon 6 of 21 NP_009054.6 O75445-2

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
USH2AENST00000307340.8 linkc.879T>G p.Leu293Leu synonymous_variant Exon 6 of 72 1 NM_206933.4 ENSP00000305941.3 O75445-1
USH2AENST00000366942.3 linkc.879T>G p.Leu293Leu synonymous_variant Exon 6 of 21 1 ENSP00000355909.3 O75445-2
USH2AENST00000674083.1 linkc.879T>G p.Leu293Leu synonymous_variant Exon 6 of 73 ENSP00000501296.1 O75445-3

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.00280
AC:
426
AN:
152040
Hom.:
14
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.000435
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00288
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.000865
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.0646
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00436
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.0000441
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00192
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.00555
AC:
1387
AN:
249974
AF XY:
0.00497
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.000246
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00691
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.000895
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.0582
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.0000463
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.00000888
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00229
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.00233
AC:
3400
AN:
1461184
Hom.:
107
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.00231
AC XY:
1676
AN XY:
726912
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.000209
AC:
7
AN:
33452
American (AMR)
AF:
0.00647
AC:
289
AN:
44642
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00111
AC:
29
AN:
26118
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.0675
AC:
2672
AN:
39612
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.00253
AC:
218
AN:
86244
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.0000187
AC:
1
AN:
53386
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.000174
AC:
1
AN:
5756
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.0000216
AC:
24
AN:
1111624
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.00263
AC:
159
AN:
60350
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.498
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
194
389
583
778
972
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
46
92
138
184
230
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.00280
AC:
426
AN:
152158
Hom.:
14
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.00321
AC XY:
239
AN XY:
74372
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.000434
AC:
18
AN:
41518
American (AMR)
AF:
0.00288
AC:
44
AN:
15274
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.000865
AC:
3
AN:
3470
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.0647
AC:
333
AN:
5144
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.00436
AC:
21
AN:
4818
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
10614
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.0000441
AC:
3
AN:
68008
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.00190
AC:
4
AN:
2108
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.508
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
24
47
71
94
118
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Genome Hom
Variant carriers
0
10
20
30
40
50
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.000592
Hom.:
1
Bravo
AF:
0.00340
Asia WGS
AF:
0.0190
AC:
67
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.0000546
EpiControl
AF:
0.00

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:2Benign:5
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Usher syndrome type 2A Uncertain:1Benign:1
Sep 16, 2020
Natera, Inc.
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Apr 27, 2017
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). Publications were found based on this search. However, the evidence from the literature, in combination with allele frequency data from public databases where available, was not sufficient to rule this variant in or out of causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as a variant of unknown significance. -

not provided Benign:2
Jan 27, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Mar 03, 2015
GeneDx
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Retinitis pigmentosa Uncertain:1
Apr 27, 2017
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases did not allow this variant to be ruled in or out of causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as a variant of unknown significance. -

not specified Benign:1
Sep 23, 2010
Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Retinal dystrophy Benign:1
Oct 01, 2023
Dept Of Ophthalmology, Nagoya University
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:research

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.88
CADD
Benign
2.7
DANN
Benign
0.50
PhyloP100
-0.89
Mutation Taster
=99/1
polymorphism

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.020
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs3767698; hg19: chr1-216498911; API