rs376772628

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -9 ACMG points: 0P and 9B. BP6BS1BS2

The NM_002047.4(GARS1):​c.562G>A​(p.Val188Ile) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000105 in 1,613,630 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.000066 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00011 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

GARS1
NM_002047.4 missense

Scores

4
8
6

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:2B:5

Conservation

PhyloP100: 9.89
Variant links:
Genes affected
GARS1 (HGNC:4162): (glycyl-tRNA synthetase 1) This gene encodes glycyl-tRNA synthetase, one of the aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases that charge tRNAs with their cognate amino acids. The encoded enzyme is an (alpha)2 dimer which belongs to the class II family of tRNA synthetases. It has been shown to be a target of autoantibodies in the human autoimmune diseases, polymyositis or dermatomyositis. Two transcript variants encoding different isoforms have been found for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Oct 2015]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -9 ACMG points.

BP6
Variant 7-30601193-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr7-30601193-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 431819.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=3, Benign=2, Uncertain_significance=2}.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population nfe. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.0000657 (10/152146) while in subpopulation NFE AF= 0.000103 (7/68014). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0000477. There are 0 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 1 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High AC in GnomAd4 at 10 AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
GARS1NM_002047.4 linkc.562G>A p.Val188Ile missense_variant Exon 4 of 17 ENST00000389266.8 NP_002038.2 P41250-1
GARS1NM_001316772.1 linkc.400G>A p.Val134Ile missense_variant Exon 4 of 17 NP_001303701.1 P41250-2

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
GARS1ENST00000389266.8 linkc.562G>A p.Val188Ile missense_variant Exon 4 of 17 1 NM_002047.4 ENSP00000373918.3 P41250-1
GARS1ENST00000675651.1 linkc.562G>A p.Val188Ile missense_variant Exon 4 of 17 ENSP00000502513.1 A0A6Q8PGZ8
GARS1ENST00000675810.1 linkc.460G>A p.Val154Ile missense_variant Exon 3 of 16 ENSP00000502743.1 A0A6Q8PHH9
GARS1ENST00000675693.1 linkc.394G>A p.Val132Ile missense_variant Exon 5 of 18 ENSP00000502174.1 A0A6Q8PGA8
GARS1ENST00000675051.1 linkc.361G>A p.Val121Ile missense_variant Exon 4 of 17 ENSP00000502296.1 A0A6Q8PGI6
GARS1ENST00000674815.1 linkc.193G>A p.Val65Ile missense_variant Exon 4 of 17 ENSP00000502799.1 A0A6Q8PGW4
GARS1ENST00000674851.1 linkc.193G>A p.Val65Ile missense_variant Exon 5 of 18 ENSP00000502451.1 A0A6Q8PGW4
GARS1ENST00000444666.6 linkn.562G>A non_coding_transcript_exon_variant Exon 4 of 18 3 ENSP00000415447.2 H7C443
GARS1ENST00000674616.1 linkn.*276G>A non_coding_transcript_exon_variant Exon 5 of 18 ENSP00000502408.1 A0A6Q8PGT3
GARS1ENST00000674643.1 linkn.562G>A non_coding_transcript_exon_variant Exon 4 of 17 ENSP00000501636.1 A0A6Q8PF45
GARS1ENST00000674737.1 linkn.562G>A non_coding_transcript_exon_variant Exon 4 of 18 ENSP00000502464.1 A0A6Q8PGZ9
GARS1ENST00000674807.1 linkn.562G>A non_coding_transcript_exon_variant Exon 4 of 16 ENSP00000502814.1 A0A6Q8PFZ6
GARS1ENST00000675529.1 linkn.*432G>A non_coding_transcript_exon_variant Exon 5 of 18 ENSP00000501655.1 A0A6Q8PFN0
GARS1ENST00000675859.1 linkn.562G>A non_coding_transcript_exon_variant Exon 4 of 15 ENSP00000502033.1 A0A6Q8PFZ6
GARS1ENST00000676088.1 linkn.*432G>A non_coding_transcript_exon_variant Exon 5 of 19 ENSP00000501884.1 A0A6Q8PFN0
GARS1ENST00000676140.1 linkn.562G>A non_coding_transcript_exon_variant Exon 4 of 17 ENSP00000502571.1 A0A6Q8PH49
GARS1ENST00000676164.1 linkn.562G>A non_coding_transcript_exon_variant Exon 4 of 17 ENSP00000501986.1 A0A6Q8PFV5
GARS1ENST00000676210.1 linkn.562G>A non_coding_transcript_exon_variant Exon 4 of 18 ENSP00000502373.1 A0A6Q8PGN7
GARS1ENST00000676259.1 linkn.492G>A non_coding_transcript_exon_variant Exon 4 of 17 ENSP00000501980.1 A0A6Q8PFU7
GARS1ENST00000676403.1 linkn.562G>A non_coding_transcript_exon_variant Exon 4 of 16 ENSP00000502681.1 A0A6Q8PHI7
GARS1ENST00000674616.1 linkn.*276G>A 3_prime_UTR_variant Exon 5 of 18 ENSP00000502408.1 A0A6Q8PGT3
GARS1ENST00000675529.1 linkn.*432G>A 3_prime_UTR_variant Exon 5 of 18 ENSP00000501655.1 A0A6Q8PFN0
GARS1ENST00000676088.1 linkn.*432G>A 3_prime_UTR_variant Exon 5 of 19 ENSP00000501884.1 A0A6Q8PFN0

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.0000657
AC:
10
AN:
152146
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.000103
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00144
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.000100
AC:
25
AN:
249510
Hom.:
0
AF XY:
0.000126
AC XY:
17
AN XY:
135370
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.000145
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.000229
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.000115
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.000109
AC:
159
AN:
1461484
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
30
AF XY:
0.000102
AC XY:
74
AN XY:
727046
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.000112
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.0000928
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.0000187
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.000130
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.0000166
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.0000657
AC:
10
AN:
152146
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.0000135
AC XY:
1
AN XY:
74320
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.000103
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00144
Alfa
AF:
0.0000575
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.0000793
TwinsUK
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
ALSPAC
AF:
0.000778
AC:
3
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.000122
AC:
1
ExAC
AF:
0.0000993
AC:
12
EpiCase
AF:
0.0000546
EpiControl
AF:
0.00

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:2Benign:5
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided Uncertain:2
Aug 30, 2018
GeneDx
Significance: Uncertain significance
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

The V188I variant has not been published as a pathogenic variant, nor has it been reported as a benign variant to our knowledge. The V188I variant is observed in 7/30,782 (0.02%) alleles from individuals of South Asian background, in the ExAC dataset (Lek et al., 2016). The V188I variant is a conservative amino acid substitution, which is not likely to impact secondary protein structure as these residues share similar properties. In-silico analyses, including protein predictors and evolutionary conservation, support that this variant does not alter protein structure/function. In summary, based on the currently available information, it is unclear whether this variant is a pathogenic variant or a rare benign variant. -

Jun 01, 2017
CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen
Significance: Uncertain significance
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

not specified Benign:1
Mar 11, 2024
Athena Diagnostics
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Distal spinal muscular atrophy Benign:1
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease type 2 Benign:1
Nov 19, 2024
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease type 2D Benign:1
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. -

Neuronopathy, distal hereditary motor, type 5A Benign:1
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.24
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.12
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.11
CADD
Pathogenic
28
DANN
Uncertain
1.0
DEOGEN2
Benign
0.25
T
Eigen
Pathogenic
0.91
Eigen_PC
Pathogenic
0.90
FATHMM_MKL
Pathogenic
0.99
D
LIST_S2
Pathogenic
0.99
D
M_CAP
Uncertain
0.12
D
MetaRNN
Uncertain
0.66
D
MetaSVM
Uncertain
0.0091
D
PrimateAI
Uncertain
0.77
T
PROVEAN
Benign
-0.98
N
REVEL
Uncertain
0.42
Sift
Uncertain
0.012
D
Sift4G
Uncertain
0.013
D
Polyphen
1.0
D
Vest4
0.66
MVP
0.71
MPC
1.0
ClinPred
0.20
T
GERP RS
5.7
RBP_binding_hub_radar
0.0
RBP_regulation_power_radar
1.7
Varity_R
0.62
gMVP
0.89

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs376772628; hg19: chr7-30640809; API