rs376772628

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -9 ACMG points: 0P and 9B. BP6BS1BS2

The NM_002047.4(GARS1):​c.562G>A​(p.Val188Ile) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000105 in 1,613,630 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.000066 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00011 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

GARS1
NM_002047.4 missense

Scores

4
8
6

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:2B:5

Conservation

PhyloP100: 9.89
Variant links:
Genes affected
GARS1 (HGNC:4162): (glycyl-tRNA synthetase 1) This gene encodes glycyl-tRNA synthetase, one of the aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases that charge tRNAs with their cognate amino acids. The encoded enzyme is an (alpha)2 dimer which belongs to the class II family of tRNA synthetases. It has been shown to be a target of autoantibodies in the human autoimmune diseases, polymyositis or dermatomyositis. Two transcript variants encoding different isoforms have been found for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Oct 2015]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -9 ACMG points.

BP6
Variant 7-30601193-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr7-30601193-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 431819.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=3, Uncertain_significance=2, Benign=2}.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population nfe. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.0000657 (10/152146) while in subpopulation NFE AF= 0.000103 (7/68014). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0000477. There are 0 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 1 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High AC in GnomAd4 at 10 AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE UniProt
GARS1NM_002047.4 linkuse as main transcriptc.562G>A p.Val188Ile missense_variant 4/17 ENST00000389266.8
GARS1NM_001316772.1 linkuse as main transcriptc.400G>A p.Val134Ile missense_variant 4/17

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Appris UniProt
GARS1ENST00000389266.8 linkuse as main transcriptc.562G>A p.Val188Ile missense_variant 4/171 NM_002047.4 P2P41250-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.0000657
AC:
10
AN:
152146
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.000103
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00144
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.000100
AC:
25
AN:
249510
Hom.:
0
AF XY:
0.000126
AC XY:
17
AN XY:
135370
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.000145
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.000229
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.000115
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.000109
AC:
159
AN:
1461484
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
30
AF XY:
0.000102
AC XY:
74
AN XY:
727046
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.000112
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.0000928
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.0000187
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.000130
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.0000166
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.0000657
AC:
10
AN:
152146
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.0000135
AC XY:
1
AN XY:
74320
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.000103
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00144
Alfa
AF:
0.0000575
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.0000793
TwinsUK
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
ALSPAC
AF:
0.000778
AC:
3
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.000122
AC:
1
ExAC
AF:
0.0000993
AC:
12
EpiCase
AF:
0.0000546
EpiControl
AF:
0.00

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:2Benign:5
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided Uncertain:2Benign:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxAug 30, 2018The V188I variant has not been published as a pathogenic variant, nor has it been reported as a benign variant to our knowledge. The V188I variant is observed in 7/30,782 (0.02%) alleles from individuals of South Asian background, in the ExAC dataset (Lek et al., 2016). The V188I variant is a conservative amino acid substitution, which is not likely to impact secondary protein structure as these residues share similar properties. In-silico analyses, including protein predictors and evolutionary conservation, support that this variant does not alter protein structure/function. In summary, based on the currently available information, it is unclear whether this variant is a pathogenic variant or a rare benign variant. -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAthena DiagnosticsSep 25, 2017- -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCeGaT Center for Human Genetics TuebingenJun 01, 2017- -
Distal spinal muscular atrophy Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 13, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease type 2 Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLabcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), LabcorpDec 21, 2023- -
Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease type 2D Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 13, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. -
Neuronopathy, distal hereditary motor, type 5A Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 13, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.24
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.12
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.11
CADD
Pathogenic
28
DANN
Uncertain
1.0
DEOGEN2
Benign
0.25
T
Eigen
Pathogenic
0.91
Eigen_PC
Pathogenic
0.90
FATHMM_MKL
Pathogenic
0.99
D
LIST_S2
Pathogenic
0.99
D
M_CAP
Uncertain
0.12
D
MetaRNN
Uncertain
0.66
D
MetaSVM
Uncertain
0.0091
D
MutationTaster
Benign
1.0
D
PrimateAI
Uncertain
0.77
T
PROVEAN
Benign
-0.98
N
REVEL
Uncertain
0.42
Sift
Uncertain
0.012
D
Sift4G
Uncertain
0.013
D
Polyphen
1.0
D
Vest4
0.66
MVP
0.71
MPC
1.0
ClinPred
0.20
T
GERP RS
5.7
RBP_binding_hub_radar
0.0
RBP_regulation_power_radar
1.7
Varity_R
0.62
gMVP
0.89

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs376772628; hg19: chr7-30640809; API